Leviticus 13:44
אִישׁ־צָרוּעַ הוּא טָמֵא הוּא טַמֵּא יְטַמְּאֶנּוּ הַכֹּהֵן בְּרֹאשׁוֹ נִגְעֽוֹ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
אִישׁ־צָר֥וּעַ ה֖וּא טָמֵ֣א ה֑וּא טַמֵּ֧א יְטַמְּאֶ֛נּוּ הַכֹּהֵ֖ן בְּרֹאשׁ֥וֹ נִגְעֽוֹ׃
μιάνσει μιανεῖ αὐτὸν ὁ ἱερεύς, ἐν τῇ κεφαλῇ αὐτοῦ ἡ ἁφὴ αὐτοῦ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Quicumque ergo maculatus fuerit lepra, et separatus est ad arbitrium sacerdotis,
el hombre está leproso. Es impuro, y el sacerdote sin duda lo declarará impuro; la infección la tiene en la cabeza.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Leproso es, es inmundo; el sacerdote lo dará luego por inmundo; en su cabeza tiene su llaga.
the man is diseased; he is unclean. The priest must pronounce him unclean because of the infection on his head.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse states that a person affected by tzaru'a ("has a serious skin disease", H6879) is unclean, and that the priest must formally pronounce him unclean because the disease is located on his head. The Hebrew repeats the pronoun "he" twice for emphasis and uses a doubled verb form to stress the certainty of the priest's declaration.
Key words
- tza.Ru.a' ("[who] has a serious skin disease", H6879) — qal passive participle, describing the man as one affected by the condition, not naming the disease itself but his resulting state.
- ta.Me' ("[is] unclean", H2931) — adjective describing ritual status, paired with the pronoun hu' ("he", H1931) to form a short, emphatic clause: "unclean he [is]."
- ta.Me' / ye.tam.me.'E.nu ("surely... he will declare unclean him", H2930A) — infinitive absolute followed by the piel imperfect of the same root, a grammatical doubling that intensifies the certainty or emphasis of the action, often rendered "he shall surely declare him unclean."
- nig.'O ("his plague", H5061) — construct noun with pronominal suffix, meaning "the plague/infection of his," linking the condition specifically to the location just named.
- ro.Sh-o ("his head", H7218A) — construct noun with suffix, specifying the location of the infection.
What the text says
The verse opens with two short nominal clauses built on repetition of the pronoun hu' ("he", H1931): "ish-tzaru'a hu" ("a man diseased he [is]") and "tame hu" ("unclean he [is]"). This structure, common in Hebrew for emphatic identification, states the man's condition and his resulting status as two parallel, terse declarations rather than a single flowing sentence.
The following clause uses an infinitive absolute of the root tm' (H2930A) immediately before the finite piel imperfect of the same root, ye.tam.me.'E.nu ("he will declare him unclean"). This infinitive-plus-finite-verb pairing is a grammatical device that reinforces the verb it accompanies — here underscoring the definiteness of the priest's action ("the priest") in official pronouncement, rather than the disease itself. The clause closes by placing the location, "on his head" (be-rosho), before "his plague" (nig'o), both in construct form with pronominal suffixes, tying the infection grammatically and spatially to the head.
Differences between versions
The Vulgate condenses the passage into a relative clause — "whoever has been stained with leprosy and has been separated at the priest's judgment" — which does not preserve the doubled "he is... he is" structure or the infinitive-plus-verb emphasis found in the Hebrew. The provided LXX segment begins directly with the verb "he will defile/declare unclean" (μιανεῖ) and the priest's action, without the initial two nominal clauses ("a man diseased... unclean") that open the Hebrew text.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.