Leviticus 13:34
וְרָאָה הַכֹּהֵן אֶת־הַנֶּתֶק בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי וְהִנֵּה לֹא־פָשָׂה הַנֶּתֶק בָּעוֹר וּמַרְאֵהוּ אֵינֶנּוּ עָמֹק מִן־הָעוֹר וְטִהַר אֹתוֹ הַכֹּהֵן וְכִבֶּס בְּגָדָיו וְטָהֵֽר׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְרָאָה֩ הַכֹּהֵ֨ן אֶת־הַנֶּ֜תֶק בַּיּ֣וֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִ֗י וְ֠הִנֵּה לֹא־פָשָׂ֤ה הַנֶּ֙תֶק֙ בָּע֔וֹר וּמַרְאֵ֕הוּ אֵינֶ֥נּוּ עָמֹ֖ק מִן־הָע֑וֹר וְטִהַ֤ר אֹתוֹ֙ הַכֹּהֵ֔ן וְכִבֶּ֥ס בְּגָדָ֖יו וְטָהֵֽר׃
καὶ ὄψεται ὁ ἱερεὺς τὸ τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῇ ἑβδόμῃ, καὶ ἰδοὺ οὐ διεχύθη τὸ θραῦσμα ἐν τῷ μετὰ τὸ ξυρηθῆναι αὐτόν, καὶ ἡ ὄψις τοῦ θραύσματος οὐκ ἔστιν κοίλη ἀπὸ τοῦ δέρματος, καὶ καθαριεῖ αὐτὸν ὁ ἱερεύς· καὶ πλυνάμενος τὰ ἱμάτια καθαρὸς ἔσται.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Si die septimo visa fuerit stetisse plaga in loco suo, nec humilior carne reliqua, mundabit eum: lotisque vestibus suis, mundus erit.
Al séptimo día el sacerdote examinará la tiña. Si no se ha extendido por la piel ni parece ser más profunda, el sacerdote declarará pura a la persona. Esta deberá lavar su ropa y quedará pura.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y al séptimo día mirará el sacerdote la tiña; y si la tiña no hubiere cundido en la piel, ni pareciere estar más profunda que la tez, el sacerdote lo dará por limpio; y lavará sus vestidos, y será limpio.
On the seventh day the priest shall examine the scaly outbreak, and if it has not spread on the skin and does not appear to be deeper than the skin, the priest is to pronounce him clean. He must wash his clothes, and he will be clean.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The priest examines the netek ("scall/scaly outbreak", H5424) on the seventh day of observation. If it has not spread in the skin and does not appear deeper than the skin, the priest declares the person pure; the person then washes their garments and becomes pure.
Key words
- ra'ah ("he will see", H7200G) — qal sequential perfect, continuing the narrative chain of priestly inspection actions begun earlier in the chapter.
- Netek ("scall", H5424) — masculine singular noun naming the specific skin condition being monitored; repeated twice to anchor both the inspection and the spreading-check.
- fasah ("it has spread", H6581) — qal perfect describing a completed (non-)action: the negation lo' ("not", H3808) precedes it, stating that spreading did not occur.
- tihar ("he will declare pure", H2891) — piel sequential perfect; the piel stem here carries a declarative-causative sense ("to pronounce pure"), distinct from the plain qal tahar used later.
- tahar ("he will be pure", H2891) — same root as tihar but in qal, describing the resulting state of the person after washing, rather than the priest's declarative act.
What the text says
The verse is built as a chain of sequential perfect verbs (ra'ah, tihar, khibbes, tahar), each linked by the narrative vav (H9001), which in Biblical Hebrew narrative continues a sequence of actions understood as following one another in time or logical order. This chain structure means the sentence reads as a procedural sequence: inspection → verification of non-spreading and non-depth → declaration of purity → washing → resulting purity.
The condition itself is expressed through two parallel clauses joined by hinneh ("there!", H2009), an interjection that draws attention to the observed facts: first, that the netek "has not spread" (lo' fasah) "in the skin" (ba-'or, H5785); second, that its "appearance" (mar'ehu, construct form of H4758 with 3ms suffix) "is not deep" ('einennu 'amoq) "from the skin" (min ha-'or). The construct forms mar'e-hu and 'eine-nu both carry pronominal suffixes referring back to the netek, tying the visual and spatial criteria directly to the skin condition under examination.
The pairing of tihar (piel, "he will declare pure") and tahar (qal, "he will be pure") in the same verse distinguishes the priest's formal pronouncement from the person's resulting condition after washing garments (khibbes, piel of H3526H, "he will wash").
Differences between versions
The LXX renders netek with τὸ θραῦσμα ("the fracture/breach") rather than a term specifically for "scall," and adds a phrase about "after he has been shaved" (μετὰ τὸ ξυρηθῆναι αὐτόν) not present in the Hebrew word list given. The Vulgate uses "plaga" ("the plague/mark") and "in loco suo" ("in its place"), phrasing that shifts the criterion of spreading into a statement about the mark remaining in its original location, differing from the Hebrew's direct statement that the netek "has not spread" (lo' fasah).
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.