Leviticus 11:22

אֶת־אֵלֶּה מֵהֶם תֹּאכֵלוּ אֶת־הָֽאַרְבֶּה לְמִינוֹ וְאֶת־הַסָּלְעָם לְמִינֵהוּ וְאֶת־הַחַרְגֹּל לְמִינֵהוּ וְאֶת־הֶחָגָב לְמִינֵֽהוּ׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

אֶת־אֵ֤לֶּה מֵהֶם֙ תֹּאכֵ֔לוּ אֶת־הָֽאַרְבֶּ֣ה לְמִינ֔וֹ וְאֶת־הַסָּלְעָ֖ם לְמִינֵ֑הוּ וְאֶת־הַחַרְגֹּ֣ל לְמִינֵ֔הוּ וְאֶת־הֶחָגָ֖ב לְמִינֵֽהוּ׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ταῦτα φάγεσθε ἀπ’ αὐτῶν· τὸν βροῦχον καὶ τὰ ὅμοια αὐτῷ, καὶ τὸν ἀττάκην καὶ τὰ ὅμοια αὐτῷ, καὶ τὴν ἀκρίδα καὶ τὰ ὅμοια αὐτῇ, καὶ τὸν ὀφιομάχην καὶ τὰ ὅμοια αὐτῶ.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

comedere debetis, ut est bruchus in genere suo, et attacus atque ophiomachus, ac locusta, singula juxta genus suum.

Spanish

De estos podrán comer: cualquier especie de langosta, el grillo calvo, el grillo común y cualquier especie de saltamontes.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Estos comeréis de ellos: la langosta según su especie, y el langostín según su especie, y el aregol según su especie, y el haghab según su especie.

English

Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket, or grasshopper.

What the text says

Summary

Leviticus 11:22 identifies four specific categories of winged swarming creatures permitted for consumption, each introduced by the direct object marker and closed with the recurring phrase "according to its kind." The verse names four insect types: 'arbeh (H0697), sal'am (H5556), chargol (H2728), and chagav (H2284).

Key words

  • 'Elleh ("these", H0428) — demonstrative particle pointing back to criteria established in the preceding verses, introducing the list that follows.
  • to.Khe.lu ("you will eat", H0398) — qal imperfect, second person masculine plural; the imperfect aspect indicates an ongoing or repeated permitted action rather than a single event.
  • mi.N / mi.Ne. ("kind", H4327) — construct noun repeated four times, each time bound to a third-person singular suffix (-o/-hu, "its"), forming the fixed formula le-mino / le-minehu ("according to its kind").
  • 'ar.Beh ("locust", H0697) — masculine singular noun, the first named creature, marked with the definite article.
  • char.Gol ("locust", H2728) — masculine singular noun, the third named creature in the series, also definite.

What the text says

The verse opens with 'et-'Elleh ("these"), a demonstrative that anaphorically refers to criteria given earlier in the chapter, followed by me-hem ("from them") and the verb tokhelu ("you will eat"), qal imperfect plural. This construction — demonstrative + partitive preposition + verb — frames the entire verse as a permission formula: from among the broader category of flying swarming creatures, these specific ones are eaten.

The body of the verse consists of four parallel units, each built identically: the direct object marker 'et, the definite article ha-, a singular masculine noun naming a creature, followed by le-mino or le-minehu ("according to its kind"). This repeated construct phrase min + pronominal suffix does not name a species precisely but rather designates a category or type associated with each named creature, allowing for internal variation within each named group. The suffix changes form (-o for 'arbeh, -hu for the remaining three) due to standard Hebrew phonological patterns with construct nouns, not due to any semantic distinction.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew text names four creatures: 'arbeh, sal'am, chargol, and chagav. The LXX renders these as βροῦχος, ἀττάκης, ἀκρίς, and ὀφιομάχης — the third Greek term (ἀκρίς, "locust") corresponds to what Hebrew lists third position-wise as chargol, while the LXX's fourth term ὀφιομάχης ("snake-fighter") diverges notably from the Hebrew chagav, which most modern translations render simply as "grasshopper." The Vulgate follows an order matching bruchus, attacus, ophiomachus, locusta, reordering the Hebrew sequence and using ophiomachus (transliterated from Greek) for the fourth term rather than a plain Latin equivalent. Modern versions (BSB, RV1909, SBLIBRE) render the four terms variously as "locust, katydid, cricket, grasshopper" or "langosta, langostín, aregol, haghab," reflecting the difficulty of identifying precise entomological equivalents for these Hebrew terms.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.