Genesis 7:21
וַיִּגְוַע כָּל־בָּשָׂר׀ הָרֹמֵשׂ עַל־הָאָרֶץ בָּעוֹף וּבַבְּהֵמָה וּבַחַיָּה וּבְכָל־הַשֶּׁרֶץ הַשֹּׁרֵץ עַל־הָאָרֶץ וְכֹל הָאָדָֽם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיִּגְוַ֞ע כָּל־בָּשָׂ֣ר׀ הָרֹמֵ֣שׂ עַל־הָאָ֗רֶץ בָּע֤וֹף וּבַבְּהֵמָה֙ וּבַ֣חַיָּ֔ה וּבְכָל־הַשֶּׁ֖רֶץ הַשֹּׁרֵ֣ץ עַל־הָאָ֑רֶץ וְכֹ֖ל הָאָדָֽם׃
καὶ ἀπέθανεν πᾶσα σὰρξ κινουμένη ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς τῶν πετεινῶν καὶ τῶν κτηνῶν καὶ τῶν θηρίων, καὶ πᾶν ἑρπετὸν κινούμενον ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, καὶ πᾶς ἄνθρωπος·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Consumptaque est omnis caro quæ movebatur super terram, volucrum, animantium, bestiarum, omniumque reptilium, quæ reptant super terram: universi homines,
Y murieron todos los seres que se movían sobre la tierra: las aves, los animales domésticos y salvajes, todos los reptiles y toda la humanidad.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y murió toda carne que se mueve sobre la tierra, así de aves como de ganados, y de bestias, y de todo reptil que anda arrastrando sobre la tierra, y todo hombre:
And every living thing that moved upon the earth perished — birds, livestock, animals, every creature that swarms upon the earth, and all mankind.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Genesis 7:21 states that all flesh moving upon the earth died, listing four categories of creatures — birds, livestock, wild animals, and swarming things — followed by "all humankind" as a separate, final group.
Key words
- va-yigva ("it died", H1478) — qal narrative form, third-person singular; grammatically the verb agrees with a singular collective subject even though it covers all living creatures.
- kol-basar ("all flesh", H3605 + H1320) — construct chain treating "flesh" as one collective noun-subject rather than a plural, so the following list explains what the collective contains.
- ha-romes ("the one creeping", H7430) — qal participle with the definite article, functioning as a substantive descriptor ("the crawling one") that qualifies basar.
- chayyah ("animal", H2416C) — feminine singular noun used collectively for wild animals, part of the fourfold list.
- ha-shorets ("the one swarming", H8317) — qal participle, parallel in form to ha-romes, describing the sherets ("swarming thing", H8318) category.
What the text says
The sentence opens with a single verb, va-yigva ("it died"), whose grammatical subject is the collective noun phrase kol-basar ("all flesh"). This flesh is further specified by a participial clause, ha-romes 'al ha-'aretz ("the one creeping on the earth"), which functions almost as a relative clause: "all flesh — the kind that creeps on the earth." After this, four categories are introduced, each preceded by the preposition be- ("in/among"): birds, livestock, chayyah, and kol ha-sherets ("all the swarming thing"), the last of which is itself further qualified by a second participle, ha-shorets 'al ha-'aretz ("the one swarming on the earth") — a grammatical echo of the earlier ha-romes clause, forming a kind of structural bracket around the list.
The final item, kol ha-'adam ("all humankind"), breaks this pattern: it is not introduced by the preposition be- like the four preceding categories, but stands independently with its own kol ("all", H3605) construct. This shift in construction sets humankind apart from the "in/among" list of animal categories, even though it is joined to the sentence by the conjunction ve- ("and").
Differences between versions
The Vulgate uses consumptaque est ("was consumed/used up") rather than a straightforward "died," a verbal choice not present in the Hebrew yigva ("died," H1478) or the LXX's apethanen ("died"). The LXX also restructures the list: it groups birds, livestock, and wild animals under one genitive series (τῶν πετεινῶν καὶ τῶν κτηνῶν καὶ τῶν θηρίων), then sets "every swarming/creeping thing" (πᾶν ἑρπετὸν) as a separate nominative clause parallel to "all flesh," diverging from the Hebrew's repeated "among" (be-) construction that binds all four animal categories together as containers of the single collective basar.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.