Genesis 49:17
יְהִי־דָן נָחָשׁ עֲלֵי־דֶרֶךְ שְׁפִיפֹן עֲלֵי־אֹרַח הַנֹּשֵׁךְ עִקְּבֵי־סוּס וַיִּפֹּל רֹכְבוֹ אָחֽוֹר׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
יְהִי־דָן֙ נָחָ֣שׁ עֲלֵי־דֶ֔רֶךְ שְׁפִיפֹ֖ן עֲלֵי־אֹ֑רַח הַנֹּשֵׁךְ֙ עִקְּבֵי־ס֔וּס וַיִּפֹּ֥ל רֹכְב֖וֹ אָחֽוֹר׃
καὶ γενηθήτω Δὰν ὄφις ἐφ’ ὁδοῦ, ένκαθήμενος ἐπὶ τρίβου· δάκνων πτέρναν ἵππου, καὶ πεσεῖται ὁ ἱππεὺς εἰς τὰ ὀπίσω,
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Fiat Dan coluber in via, cerastes in semita, mordens ungulas equi, ut cadat ascensor ejus retro.
Dan será una serpiente junto al camino, una víbora junto al sendero, que muerde los talones del caballo para que el jinete caiga de espaldas.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Será Dan serpiente junto al camino, cerasta junto á la senda, que muerde los talones de los caballos, y hace caer por detrás al cabalgador de ellos.
He will be a snake by the road, a viper in the path that bites the horse ’s heels so that its rider tumbles backward.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse compares Dan to a snake and a viper positioned on a road and path, biting a horse's heels so that its rider falls backward. It is part of Jacob's poetic pronouncements over his sons in Genesis 49.
Key words
- ye.hi- ("may he be", H1961) — qal jussive of the verb "to be", expressing a wish or prediction rather than a flat statement of fact.
- na.Chash ("a snake", H5175) — masculine singular noun, the first of two animal images applied to Dan.
- she.fi.Fon ("a viper", H8207) — masculine singular noun, paired with na.Chash in synonymous parallelism.
- no.sheKh ("[one which] bites", H5391A) — qal participle with definite article ha. ("the", H9009), describing an ongoing or characteristic action ("the one who bites") rather than a single event.
- i.yi.Pol ("he fell", H5307G) — qal narrative form (vav-consecutive), shifting the sentence from description to a resulting event ("and then he fell").
What the text says
The verse opens with the jussive ye.hi- ("may he be", H1961), a grammatical form expressing wish or characterization rather than simple present tense — it frames Dan's identity as a pronounced blessing/description rather than a neutral fact. This is followed by two parallel noun phrases: na.Chash ("a snake", H5175) 'a.lei- De.rekh ("on a road", H5921A + H1870L), and she.fi.Fon ("a viper", H8207) 'a.lei- 'O.rach ("on a path", H5921A + H0734). The repetition of 'a.lei- ("on", H5921A) with two near-synonymous terms for road (De.rekh, 'O.rach) and two near-synonymous terms for snake (na.Chash, she.fi.Fon) creates a poetic parallelism typical of Hebrew verse.
The participle no.sheKh ("[one which] bites", H5391A), marked with the definite article ha. ("the", H9009), functions almost like a relative clause: "the one that bites the heels of a horse" ('i.ke.vei- Sus, H6119 + H5483M, a construct chain meaning "heels of a horse"). Participles in Hebrew narrative/poetic verse often describe habitual or characteristic action rather than a single instance, reinforcing the image of Dan's stealth as an ongoing trait.
The final clause shifts grammatically: va-yi.Pol ("and he fell", H9001 + H5307G) uses the narrative vav-consecutive construction, which typically sequences completed past events in Hebrew narrative, here describing the result of the snake's bite. ro.khe.V-o ("its rider", H7392 + H9023) is a participle in construct with a pronominal suffix, literally "the one riding of it/him," referring back to the horse.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders she.fi.Fon ("a viper", H8207) with the participle ένκαθήμενος ("lying in wait"), an interpretive addition not present as a separate lexical item in the Hebrew noun. The Vulgate translates she.fi.Fon as "cerastes" (a horned viper), a specific species name, while the Hebrew term is a more general word for viper. The Vulgate also renders the plural 'i.ke.vei- Sus ("heels of a horse", singular Sus in Hebrew) as "ungulas equi" using a singular "equi" but "ungulas" (hooves) as plural, slightly shifting the anatomical image from "heels" to "hooves."
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.