Genesis 48:1
וַיְהִי אַחֲרֵי הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה וַיֹּאמֶר לְיוֹסֵף הִנֵּה אָבִיךָ חֹלֶה וַיִּקַּח אֶת־שְׁנֵי בָנָיו עִמּוֹ אֶת־מְנַשֶּׁה וְאֶת־אֶפְרָֽיִם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיְהִ֗י אַחֲרֵי֙ הַדְּבָרִ֣ים הָאֵ֔לֶּה וַיֹּ֣אמֶר לְיוֹסֵ֔ף הִנֵּ֥ה אָבִ֖יךָ חֹלֶ֑ה וַיִּקַּ֞ח אֶת־שְׁנֵ֤י בָנָיו֙ עִמּ֔וֹ אֶת־מְנַשֶּׁ֖ה וְאֶת־אֶפְרָֽיִם׃
Ἐγένετο δὲ μετὰ τὰ ῥήματα ταῦτα ἀπηηέλη τῷ Ἰωσὴφ ὅτι Ὁ πατήρ σου ἐνοχλεῖται· καὶ ἀναλαβὼν τοὺς δύο υἱοὺς αὐτοῦ, τὸν Μανσσὴ καὶ τὸν Ἐφράιμ, ἦλθεν πρὸς Ἰακώβ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
His ita transactis, nuntiatum est Joseph quod ægrotaret pater suus: qui, assumptis duobus filiis Manasse et Ephraim, ire perrexit.
Pasado algún tiempo, le avisaron a José: “Tu padre está muy enfermo”. Entonces José tomó a sus dos hijos, Manasés y Efraín, y fue a verlo.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y SUCEDIÓ después de estas cosas el haberse dicho á José: He aquí tu padre está enfermo. Y él tomó consigo sus dos hijos Manasés y Ephraim.
Some time later Joseph was told, “ Your father is ill.” So he set out with his two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse marks a narrative transition ("and it happened after these things") and reports that Joseph was informed of his father's illness. Joseph then takes his two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim, with him.
Key words
- yehi ("it was", H1961) — qal narrative form of "to be," the standard formula opening a new narrative unit ("and it came to pass").
- 'acharei ("after", H310A) — construct form governing ha-devarim ha-'elleh ("these things"), marking temporal sequence with the preceding material.
- yomer ("someone said", H0559) — qal narrative, third person masculine singular, with no explicit subject stated in the Hebrew clause itself.
- choleh ("sick", H2470H) — qal participle, masculine singular, describing an ongoing state ("is [in a state of] being sick") rather than a completed action.
- yiqqach ("he took", H3947G) — qal narrative, third masculine singular, referring back to Joseph as subject, introducing the action of taking his sons.
What the text says
The verse opens with the narrative formula va-yehi 'acharei ha-devarim ha-'elleh ("and it was after these things"), a construction that ties this episode to the preceding narrative without specifying exactly which prior events are meant beyond "these things" (ha-devarim ha-'elleh, H1697I + H0428). The subject of yomer ("said") is grammatically unspecified — the Hebrew simply has a third-person verb with no named subject, which functions as an impersonal construction ("one said" / "it was said") introducing the report le-Yosef ("to Joseph", H3130G).
The reported content, hinneh 'avikha choleh ("behold, your father is sick"), is direct speech marked by the interjection hinneh (H2009), and choleh is a participle indicating a present, ongoing condition rather than a punctual event. The final clause shifts back to third-person narrative with va-yiqqach ("and he took"), whose subject is Joseph, taking 'et-shenei vanav 'immo ("his two sons with him", H8147+H1121A), specified by the direct object marker 'et (H0853) before each proper name, Menasheh (H4519G) and 'Efrayim (H0669G).
Differences between versions
The Hebrew verb yomer ("someone said") is impersonal and active in form, with no stated subject. The LXX renders this with a passive, ἀπηγγέλη ("it was announced"), and the Vulgate similarly uses a passive, nuntiatum est ("it was announced"), both making explicit what the Hebrew leaves grammatically unspecified. The Vulgate further renders the report as indirect discourse (quod aegrotaret, subjunctive "that his father was sick") rather than as the direct quotation preserved in the Hebrew (hinneh 'avikha choleh) and largely kept by the LXX (ὅτι followed by a direct-style statement). The LXX also adds a closing clause, ἦλθεν πρὸς Ἰακώβ ("he went to Jacob"), and the Vulgate adds ire perrexit ("he proceeded to go"), neither of which appears in the Hebrew text as given here, which ends simply with the naming of Manasseh and Ephraim.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.