Genesis 46:26
כָּל־הַנֶּפֶשׁ הַבָּאָה לְיַעֲקֹב מִצְרַיְמָה יֹצְאֵי יְרֵכוֹ מִלְּבַד נְשֵׁי בְנֵי־יַעֲקֹב כָּל־נֶפֶשׁ שִׁשִּׁים וָשֵֽׁשׁ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
כָּל־הַ֠נֶּפֶשׁ הַבָּאָ֨ה לְיַעֲקֹ֤ב מִצְרַ֙יְמָה֙ יֹצְאֵ֣י יְרֵכ֔וֹ מִלְּבַ֖ד נְשֵׁ֣י בְנֵי־יַעֲקֹ֑ב כָּל־נֶ֖פֶשׁ שִׁשִּׁ֥ים וָשֵֽׁשׁ׃
πᾶσαι δὲ ψυχαὶ αἱ εἰσελθοῦσαι μετὰ Ἰακὼβ εἰς Αἴγυπτον, οἱ ἐξελθόντες ἐκ τῶν μηρῶν αὐτοῦ, χωρὶς τῶν γυναικῶν υἱῶν Ἰακώβ, πᾶσαι ψυχαὶ ἑξήκοντα ἕξ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Cunctæ animæ, quæ ingressæ sunt cum Jacob in Ægyptum, et egressæ sunt de femore illius, absque uxoribus filiorum ejus, sexaginta sex.
El total de las personas que llegaron a Egipto con Jacob y que eran de su propia sangre (sin contar a las esposas de sus hijos), fue de sesenta y seis.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Todas las personas que vinieron con Jacob á Egipto, procedentes de sus lomos, sin las mujeres de los hijos de Jacob, todas las personas fueron sesenta y seis.
All those belonging to Jacob who came to Egypt — his direct descendants, besides the wives of Jacob ’s sons —numbered sixty-six persons.
✦ What the text says
Summary
This verse gives the total count of people who accompanied Jacob into Egypt as his direct descendants, excluding the wives of his sons. The Hebrew states the total as sixty-six persons, all reckoned as having "come out of his thigh," a Hebrew idiom for biological descent.
Key words
- nefesh ("person", H5315) — feminine singular noun used collectively to count individuals; it appears twice (in kol-hannefesh, "every person," and kol-nefesh, "every person," at the end), framing the verse as a census statement.
- ba'ah ("went", H0935) — qal participle feminine singular, describing the nefesh as "the one going/coming" to Egypt with Jacob; the participle form presents this as an ongoing or characterizing state rather than a single completed action.
- yotze'ei ("[who] came out of", H3318) — qal participle masculine plural construct, governing yerekho ("his thigh," H3409 + 3rd person suffix); the construct chain yotze'ei yerekho literally means "those coming out of his thigh," an idiom for direct bodily descendants.
- milevad (from mi H9006 + le H9005 + vad H0905) — a compound preposition meaning "besides/apart from," here excluding the neshei venei-Ya'aqov ("wives of the sons of Jacob," H0802 + H1121) from the count.
- shishim vashesh ("sixty and six", H8346 + H8337) — cardinal numbers joined by the conjunction va ("and", H9002), forming the final tally "sixty-six."
What the text says
The verse opens with kol-hannefesh habba'ah le-Ya'aqov Mitzraymah ("every person who went to Jacob, Egypt-ward"), using the definite article on both nefesh and the participle ba'ah to mark this as a specific, previously identified group. The directional suffix -ah on Mitzraymah ("Egypt", H4714) indicates motion toward Egypt, reinforcing the participle's sense of movement.
The phrase yotze'ei yerekho ("those coming out of his thigh") is a construct chain functioning as an idiom for physical descent from Jacob's own body, distinguishing his blood descendants from those who joined the household by marriage. The exclusion clause milevad neshei venei-Ya'aqov ("besides the wives of the sons of Jacob") clarifies that the count of sixty-six covers only Jacob's bloodline, not in-marrying women. The verse closes by repeating kol-nefesh ("every person") before giving the sum shishim vashesh ("sixty-six"), a resumptive structure common in Hebrew enumerations, restating the subject before delivering the final number.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders yotze'ei yerekho ("those coming out of his thigh") as οἱ ἐξελθόντες ἐκ τῶν μηρῶν αὐτοῦ ("those who came out from his thighs"), using the plural "thighs" (μηρῶν) where the Hebrew has the singular yerekho ("his thigh," H3409 + suffix). The Vulgate follows the Hebrew singular sense with de femore illius ("from his thigh," singular). Both LXX and Vulgate preserve the idiom of descent through the body rather than substituting a more abstract term like "descendants."
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.