Genesis 46:15
אֵלֶּה׀ בְּנֵי לֵאָה אֲשֶׁר יָֽלְדָה לְיַעֲקֹב בְּפַדַּן אֲרָם וְאֵת דִּינָה בִתּוֹ כָּל־נֶפֶשׁ בָּנָיו וּבְנוֹתָיו שְׁלֹשִׁים וְשָׁלֹֽשׁ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
אֵ֣לֶּה׀ בְּנֵ֣י לֵאָ֗ה אֲשֶׁ֨ר יָֽלְדָ֤ה לְיַעֲקֹב֙ בְּפַדַּ֣ן אֲרָ֔ם וְאֵ֖ת דִּינָ֣ה בִתּ֑וֹ כָּל־נֶ֧פֶשׁ בָּנָ֛יו וּבְנוֹתָ֖יו שְׁלֹשִׁ֥ים וְשָׁלֹֽשׁ׃
οὗτοι υἱοὶ Λείας, οὓς ἔτεκεν τῷ Ἰακὼβ ἐν Μεσοποταμίᾳ τῆς Συρίας, καὶ Δείναν τὴν θυγατέρα αὐτοῦ· πᾶσαι αἱ ψυχαί, υἱοὶ καὶ αἱ θυγατέρες, τριάκοντα τρεῖς.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Hi filii Liæ quos genuit in Mesopotamia Syriæ cum Dina filia sua: omnes animæ filiorum ejus et filiarum, triginta tres.
Éstos fueron los hijos que Lea le dio a Jacob en Padán Aram, además de su hija Dina. En total, los hijos y las hijas de Lea eran treinta y tres personas.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Estos fueron los hijos de Lea, los que parió á Jacob en Padan-aram, y además su hija Dina: treinta y tres las almas todas de sus hijos é hijas.
These are the sons of Leah born to Jacob in Paddan-aram, in addition to his daughter Dinah. The total number of sons and daughters was thirty-three. The Children of Zilpah
✦ What the text says
Summary
This verse closes the list of Leah's descendants, identifying them as the sons she bore to Jacob in Paddan-aram, together with her daughter Dinah. It concludes with a numerical summary: the total count of persons among Leah's sons and daughters was thirty-three.
Key words
- 'Elleh ("these", H0428) — demonstrative particle opening the verse, pointing back to the preceding genealogical list and marking this as its summary statement.
- yal'dah ("she had borne", H3205) — qal perfect, third person feminine singular, indicating a completed past action; the subject is Leah, expressed through the verb form itself without a separate pronoun.
- ve'et ("and ", H0854/H9002) — the conjunction combined with the direct object marker introduces Dinah as an additional object of the bearing, syntactically distinct from "sons."
- Nefesh (" person of", H5315J) — feminine singular noun in construct state, here functioning as a collective counting term ("persons," "individuals") rather than referring to soul in an abstract sense.
- banav ("sons", H1121A) with pronominal suffix -o ("his") — construct plural noun marking possession, referring back to Jacob as the one to whom these sons belong.
What the text says
The verse opens with the demonstrative 'Elleh ("these"), functioning cataphorically to summarize the list just given: bene Le'ah ("sons of Leah", construct chain). The relative clause introduced by 'asher ("whom") governs the verb yal'dah ("she had borne"), a qal perfect that encodes completed action attributed to Leah as subject. This verb takes two prepositional complements: le-Ya'aqov ("to Jacob") marking the recipient/father, and be-Paddan 'Aram ("in Paddan Aram") marking location.
The conjunction plus object marker ve'et then adds Dinah as a distinct item — grammatically she is introduced via the object marker rather than as a coordinate subject of yal'dah, though she is likewise Leah's offspring, marked as bito ("his daughter," with suffix referring to Jacob).
The closing clause uses kol-nefesh ("every person of," construct chain) followed by banav u-venotav ("his sons and his daughters") to produce a collective count: nefesh here does not mean "soul" in an abstract sense but functions as a counting unit for individuals, comparable to "head" in enumeration. The total is given by the cardinal numbers shloshim ve-shalosh ("thirty and three").
Differences between versions
The Hebrew be-Paddan 'Aram ("in Paddan Aram") is rendered in the LXX as ἐν Μεσοποταμίᾳ τῆς Συρίας ("in Mesopotamia of Syria"), substituting a Greek geographic term for the Hebrew place name; the Vulgate follows this same rendering with "in Mesopotamia Syriae." The Hebrew nefesh ("person," singular construct) is rendered in the LXX as the plural ψυχαί ("souls"), and the Vulgate uses animae ("souls"), both plural nouns, differing from the singular collective form in the Hebrew construct chain.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.