Genesis 41:50

וּלְיוֹסֵף יֻלַּד שְׁנֵי בָנִים בְּטֶרֶם תָּבוֹא שְׁנַת הָרָעָב אֲשֶׁר יָֽלְדָה־לּוֹ אָֽסְנַת בַּת־פּוֹטִי פֶרַע כֹּהֵן אֽוֹן׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וּלְיוֹסֵ֤ף יֻלַּד֙ שְׁנֵ֣י בָנִ֔ים בְּטֶ֥רֶם תָּב֖וֹא שְׁנַ֣ת הָרָעָ֑ב אֲשֶׁ֤ר יָֽלְדָה־לּוֹ֙ אָֽסְנַ֔ת בַּת־פּ֥וֹטִי פֶ֖רַע כֹּהֵ֥ן אֽוֹן׃

Greek (Septuagint)

τῷ δὲ ἸωςὴΦ ἐγένοντο υἱοὶ δύο πρὸ τοῦ ἐλθεῖν τὰ ἑπτὰ err; τοῦ λιμοῦ, οὓς ἔτεκεν αὐτῷ Ἀσεννὲθ θυγάτηρ ΙΙετρεΦῆ ἱερέως Ἡλίου ΙΙόλεως.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Nati sunt autem Joseph filii duo antequam veniret fames: quos peperit ei Aseneth filia Putiphare sacerdotis Heliopoleos.

Spanish

Antes de que llegaran los años de hambre, José tuvo dos hijos con Asenat, la hija de Potifera, el sacerdote de On.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y nacieron á José dos hijos antes que viniese el primer año del hambre, los cuales le parió Asenath, hija de Potipherah, sacerdote de On.

English

Before the years of famine arrived, two sons were born to Joseph by Asenath daughter of Potiphera, priest of On.

What the text says

Summary

The verse reports that two sons were born to Joseph before the year of famine arrived, and identifies their mother as Asenath, daughter of Potiphera, priest of On.

Key words

  • yulLad ("it was born", H3205) — qal pual perfect, third masculine singular; the passive intensive form marks the birth as a completed event narrated from the sons' perspective ("there were born"), rather than focusing on Joseph as agent.
  • terem ("before", H2962) — used with the preposition be ("in") to form a temporal clause, "before... came," setting the birth in relation to a future event described with an imperfect verb.
  • taVo' ("it came", H0935G) — qal imperfect, third feminine singular, agreeing with shenat ("year of", H8141) which is grammatically feminine; the imperfect here marks the famine's arrival as not-yet-realized at the time of the sons' birth.
  • yaledah ("she bore", H3205) — qal perfect, third feminine singular, referring to Asenath as the one who bore the children; this verb is grammatically distinct from yullad (pual) used for the sons "being born" in the first clause.
  • kohen ("priest of", H3548) — construct singular, linking Potiphera's title to the place name 'On ("On", H0204), specifying his priestly office there.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence opens with u-le-Yosef ("and to Joseph"), placing Joseph in a dative-like position before the passive verb yullad ("it was born"), so the grammatical subject is shenei vanim ("two sons", H8147 construct + H1121A), with Joseph as the indirect recipient. This construction differs from an active "Joseph fathered/begot," emphasizing the sons as the grammatical focus rather than Joseph's action.

The temporal clause be-terem tavo' shenat ha-ra'av ("before the year of the famine came") uses the imperfect tavo' to describe the famine's arrival as not yet accomplished relative to the birth, establishing a before/after sequence between the sons' birth and the onset of the famine year.

The final clause shifts to an active qal perfect, asher yaledah-lo Asenat ("whom Asenath bore to him"), where the relative particle 'asher ("whom", H0834A) connects back to the "two sons" and names Asenath as the one who bore them, followed by her genealogy through the construct chain bat-Poti-fera' kohen 'On ("daughter of Potiphera, priest of On").

Differences between versions

The LXX renders shenat ha-ra'av ("the year of the famine") with τὰ ἑπτὰ ἔτη τοῦ λιμοῦ ("the seven years of the famine"), specifying a numeral not present in the Hebrew, which speaks only of "the year" in the singular. The Vulgate follows the Hebrew more closely with antequam veniret fames ("before the famine came"), without the numeral seen in the LXX. The Hebrew place name 'On (H0204) appears in the LXX as Ἡλίου Πόλεως ("City of Heliopolis") and in the Vulgate as Heliopoleos, both rendering the Egyptian toponym by its Greek equivalent rather than transliterating the Hebrew form.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.