Genesis 4:7
הֲלוֹא אִם־תֵּיטִיב שְׂאֵת וְאִם לֹא תֵיטִיב לַפֶּתַח חַטָּאת רֹבֵץ וְאֵלֶיךָ תְּשׁוּקָתוֹ וְאַתָּה תִּמְשָׁל־בּֽוֹ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
הֲל֤וֹא אִם־תֵּיטִיב֙ שְׂאֵ֔ת וְאִם֙ לֹ֣א תֵיטִ֔יב לַפֶּ֖תַח חַטָּ֣את רֹבֵ֑ץ וְאֵלֶ֙יךָ֙ תְּשׁ֣וּקָת֔וֹ וְאַתָּ֖ה תִּמְשָׁל־בּֽוֹ׃
οὐκ ἐὰν ὀρθῶς προσενέγκῃς, ὀρθῶς δὲ μὴ διέλῃς, ἥμαρτες; ἡσύχασον· πρὸς σὲ ἡ ἀποστροφὴ αὐτοῦ, καὶ σὺ ἄρξεις αὐτοῦ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
nonne si bene egeris, recipies: sin autem male, statim in foribus peccatum aderit? sed sub te erit appetitus ejus, et tu dominaberis illius.
Si hicieras lo bueno, podrías andar con la frente en alto. Pero, si haces lo malo, el pecado te acecha como una fiera lista para atraparte. No obstante, tú puedes dominarlo”.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Si bien hicieres, ¿ no serás ensalzado? y si no hicieres bien, el pecado está á la puerta: con todo esto, á ti será su deseo, y tú te enseñorearás de él.
If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you refuse to do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires you, but you must master it.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse poses a rhetorical question contrasting two outcomes based on conduct — doing well or not — and states that "sin" is positioned at "the door," with a "desire" directed toward the addressee, followed by a statement about the addressee's capacity to "rule" over it. The Hebrew syntax uses an interrogative-negative opening followed by two parallel conditional clauses.
Key words
- tei.Tiv ("you will do well", H3190) — hiphil imperfect, a causative form indicating an action the addressee brings about (doing well/making good), repeated in both conditional clauses.
- se.'Et ("lifting up", H7613) — feminine singular noun, the object/result associated with the first condition ("if you do well").
- ro.Vetz ("[is] crouching", H7257) — qal participle, masculine singular, describing an ongoing state; it modifies chatat ("sin", H2403B), which is grammatically feminine — a gender mismatch between noun and participle present in the text.
- te.Shu.ka.T + -o ("desire...its/his", H8669 + H9023) — feminine singular construct noun with a masculine possessive suffix, forming "the desire of it/him," directed toward "you" ('eleikha).
- tim.shol ("you will rule", H4910) — qal imperfect, second person masculine, paired with the preposition-plus-suffix bo ("in/over it/him", H9033), also masculine.
What the text says
The clause opens with ha (H9008) plus lo' (H3808), producing a rhetorical negative question ("is it not..."), followed by two mirrored conditional clauses marked by 'im (H0518A): "if you do well" / "and if you do not do well." Both use the identical hiphil imperfect tei.Tiv, creating a grammatical parallelism between the positive and negative outcomes. The noun se'et stands as the result tied to the first condition, while the second condition leads into a description: chatat ("sin") is said to be rovetz ("crouching") "at the door" (la-Petach, H6607 with article).
A notable grammatical feature is that chatat is a feminine noun, yet the participle describing it, rovetz, is masculine, and the pronominal suffixes that follow — in teshuqato ("its desire") and bo ("over it") — are also masculine. The Hebrew text does not resolve grammatically to which noun (masculine petach, "door," or feminine chatat, "sin") these masculine suffixes refer; the data show only the morphological forms as given, without disambiguation.
Differences between versions
The LXX (Swete) renders the passage with different verbs — προσενέγκῃς ("you offer") and διέλῃς ("you divide") — and ends the first section with a direct statement, ἥμαρτες ("you sinned"), rather than the Hebrew's image of sin "crouching" at a "door." The Vulgate uses recipies ("you will receive") for the Hebrew se'et ("lifting up"), and peccatum aderit ("sin will be present") for chatat rovetz ("sin is crouching"), replacing the participial image with a future verb of presence.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.