Genesis 36:35

וַיָּמָת חֻשָׁם וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו הֲדַד בֶּן־בְּדַד הַמַּכֶּה אֶת־מִדְיָן בִּשְׂדֵה מוֹאָב וְשֵׁם עִירוֹ עֲוִֽית׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיָּ֖מָת חֻשָׁ֑ם וַיִּמְלֹ֨ךְ תַּחְתָּ֜יו הֲדַ֣ד בֶּן־בְּדַ֗ד הַמַּכֶּ֤ה אֶת־מִדְיָן֙ בִּשְׂדֵ֣ה מוֹאָ֔ב וְשֵׁ֥ם עִיר֖וֹ עֲוִֽית׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ἀπέθανεν δὲ Ἀσόμ, καὶ ἐβασίλευσεν ἀντ’ αὐτοῦ Ἁδὰδ υἱὸς Βαράδ, ὁ ἐκκόψας Μαδιάμ ἐν τῷ πεδίῳ Μαωάβ. καὶ ὄνομα τῇ πόλει αὐτοῦ Γεθθόιμ.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Hoc quoque mortuo, regnavit pro eo Adad filius Badad, qui percussit Madian in regione Moab: et nomen urbis ejus Avith.

Spanish

Cuando murió Jusam, lo sucedió Hadad, el hijo de Bedad, quien derrotó a Madián en el campo de Moab. Su ciudad se llamaba Avit.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y murió Husam, y reinó en su lugar Adad, hijo de Badad, el que hirió á Midián en el campo de Moab: y el nombre de su ciudad fué Avith.

English

When Husham died, Hadad son of Bedad, who defeated Midian in the country of Moab, reigned in his place. And the name of his city was Avith.

What the text says

Summary

The verse records the death of the Edomite king Husham and the succession of Hadad son of Bedad, noting that Hadad had defeated Midian in the region of Moab, and that his city was named Avith.

Key words

  • va-yimlokh ("and he reigned", H4427A) — qal narrative verb, continuing the chain of successive events typical of the king-list formula in this chapter.
  • ha-makeh ("the one defeating / who defeated", H5221) — hiphil participle with definite article ha ("the", H9009); functions as a substantive description ("the one who struck/defeated") attached to Hadad, marking a completed but ongoing-relevant action rather than a simple past verb.
  • ben ("son of", H1121A) — construct noun linking Hadad to his father Bedad, standard patronymic construction.
  • sedeh ("region/field of", H7704G) — construct noun specifying location, "field of Moab," locating the battle geographically.
  • shem ("name of", H8034) construct + iro ("his city", H5892B + H9023 suffix) — construct chain naming the city belonging to Hadad.

What the text says

The verse is built on two narrative verbs in sequence: va-yamot ("and he died", H4191) and va-yimlokh ("and he reigned", H4427A), both qal forms marked by the narrative vav (H9001), which in Biblical Hebrew signals sequential action — "he died, and then he reigned." This chain structure is characteristic of the king-lists in Genesis 36, where each ruler's death directly triggers the notice of his successor, with no independent clause breaking the sequence.

The description of Hadad is appended through a participial clause: ha-makeh ("the one defeating", H5221), a hiphil participle with the article ha (H9009). Hebrew participles with the article often function like a relative clause ("who defeated" / "the one who defeated"), attaching a biographical note to Hadad without requiring a separate finite verb or explicit relative pronoun such as asher. The direct object marker 'et (H0853) before Midyan (H4080H) confirms Midian as the object struck, and the phrase bi-sdeh Mo'av ("in the field/region of Moab", H7704G + H4124G) is a construct chain locating this event.

The closing clause uses a construct pair, shem ("name of", H8034) plus ir-o ("his city", H5892B with suffix H9023), to introduce the city name Avit (H5762), following the same naming pattern used elsewhere in the king-list for identifying each ruler's city of origin.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders Husham as Ἀσόμ (Asom) and Bedad as Βαράδ (Barad), differing in transliteration from the Hebrew Chusham (H2367) and Bedad (H0911). The city name Avith (H5762) appears in the LXX as Γεθθόιμ (Geththoim), a notably different form from the Hebrew and from the Vulgate's Avith, which matches the Hebrew more closely. The LXX also renders the participle ha-makeh ("the one defeating", H5221) with the aorist participle ὁ ἐκκόψας ("the one who cut down/destroyed"), a stronger or more specific verb than the Hebrew's general "striking/defeating."

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.