Genesis 34:7

וּבְנֵי יַעֲקֹב בָּאוּ מִן־הַשָּׂדֶה כְּשָׁמְעָם וַיִּֽתְעַצְּבוּ הָֽאֲנָשִׁים וַיִּחַר לָהֶם מְאֹד כִּֽי־נְבָלָה עָשָׂה בְיִשְׂרָאֵל לִשְׁכַּב אֶת־בַּֽת־יַעֲקֹב וְכֵן לֹא יֵעָשֶֽׂה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וּבְנֵ֨י יַעֲקֹ֜ב בָּ֤אוּ מִן־הַשָּׂדֶה֙ כְּשָׁמְעָ֔ם וַיִּֽתְעַצְּבוּ֙ הָֽאֲנָשִׁ֔ים וַיִּ֥חַר לָהֶ֖ם מְאֹ֑ד כִּֽי־נְבָלָ֞ה עָשָׂ֣ה בְיִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל לִשְׁכַּב֙ אֶת־בַּֽת־יַעֲקֹ֔ב וְכֵ֖ן לֹ֥א יֵעָשֶֽׂה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

οἱ δὲ υἱοὶ Ἰακὼβ ἦλθον ἐκ τοῦ πεδίου· ὡς δὲ ἤκουσαν, κατενύχθησαν οἱ ἄνδρες, καὶ λυπηρὸν ἦν αὐτοῖς σφόδρα, ὅτι ἄσχημον ἐποίησεν Συχὲμ ἐν Ἰσραήλ, κοιμηθεὶς μετὰ τῆς θυγατρὸς Ἰακώβ· καὶ οὐχ οὕτως ἔσται.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

ecce filii ejus veniebant de agro: auditoque quod acciderat, irati sunt valde, eo quod fœdam rem operatus esset in Israël et, violata filia Jacob, rem illicitam perpetrasset.

Spanish

Al enterarse de lo sucedido, los hijos de Jacob regresaron del campo. Estaban indignados y furiosos, porque Siquén había cometido una infamia en Israel al acostarse con la hija de Jacob, algo que jamás debía hacerse.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y los hijos de Jacob vinieron del campo cuando lo supieron; y se entristecieron los varones, y se ensañaron mucho, porque hizo vileza en Israel echándose con la hija de Jacob, lo que no se debía haber hecho.

English

When Jacob ’s sons heard what had happened, they returned from the field. They were filled with grief and fury, because Shechem had committed an outrage in Israel by lying with Jacob ’s daughter — a thing that should not be done.

What the text says

Summary

The verse reports that Jacob's sons returned from the field and, upon hearing what had happened to their sister, became grieved and very angry, because a disgraceful act had been committed against Israel through the lying with Jacob's daughter — something the text says should not be done.

Key words

  • va.yit.'atzevu ("they were indignant/grieved", H6087A) — hithpael narrative form (reflexive stem), suggesting the men experienced this distress internally/upon themselves, not merely felt an external emotion.
  • yi.char ("it burned", H2734) — qal narrative, idiomatic for anger; the verb's subject is impersonal ("it burned to them"), with la.hem ("to them", H9038) marking the sons as those affected.
  • nevalah ("a disgraceful folly", H5039) — feminine singular noun, the direct object of asah ("he had done", H6213A); a term for a shameful, senseless act.
  • yesh'aseh ("it is done", H6213A) — niphal (passive) imperfect, describing an ongoing/future norm: the same root used for "he had done" (asah) appears here in passive voice for the general statement "thus it is not done."
  • lishkav ("lying with", H7901I) — qal infinitive, expressing the specific act that constitutes the nevalah.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence structure places the sons' arrival first (u-venei Ya'aqov ba'u min-hasadeh, "and the sons of Jacob came from the field"), then attaches a temporal clause with the infinitive construct ke-shom'am ("when/in their hearing", from shama), followed by two narrative-vav verbs describing sequential reactions: va-yit'atzevu ("and they were indignant") and va-yichar ("and it burned"). This chain (vav + verb) marks consecutive completed actions in the story's timeline: hearing, then grief, then anger.

The causal clause beginning with ki ("for", H3588A) explains the reason: nevalah asah be-Yisra'el — "a nevalah he had done in Israel." The verb asah is qal perfect (completed action), attributing the deed to an unnamed "he" (grammatically implicit, not spelled out by name in the Hebrew clause itself). The infinitive lishkav ("to lie with") specifies the nature of the act, joined to the direct object marker 'et before bat-Ya'aqov ("daughter of Jacob").

The closing clause, ve-khen lo yiy'aseh ("and thus it is not done"), uses the niphal (passive) imperfect of the same root as asah, shifting from a specific completed deed to a general, ongoing/habitual negative statement about such acts.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew clause "ki-nevalah asah be-Yisra'el" does not name the subject of asah ("he had done") within this word-by-word data; the LXX makes the subject explicit by inserting "Συχέμ" (Shechem), rendering "ἄσχημον ἐποίησεν Συχὲμ ἐν Ἰσραήλ" ("Shechem committed an unseemly thing in Israel"). The Vulgate likewise supplies an implicit subject ("eo quod... operatus esset") without naming Shechem directly, keeping it impersonal like the Hebrew but still assuming a single male subject.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.