Genesis 34:22

אַךְ־בְּזֹאת יֵאֹתוּ לָנוּ הָאֲנָשִׁים לָשֶׁבֶת אִתָּנוּ לִהְיוֹת לְעַם אֶחָד בְּהִמּוֹל לָנוּ כָּל־זָכָר כַּאֲשֶׁר הֵם נִמֹּלִֽים׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

אַךְ־בְּ֠זֹאת יֵאֹ֨תוּ לָ֤נוּ הָאֲנָשִׁים֙ לָשֶׁ֣בֶת אִתָּ֔נוּ לִהְי֖וֹת לְעַ֣ם אֶחָ֑ד בְּהִמּ֥וֹל לָ֙נוּ֙ כָּל־זָכָ֔ר כַּאֲשֶׁ֖ר הֵ֥ם נִמֹּלִֽים׃

Greek (Septuagint)

μόνον ἐν τούτῳ ὁμοιωθήσονται ἡμῖν οἱ ἄνθρωποι τοῦ κατοικεῖν μεθ’ ἡμῶν ὥστε εἶναι λαὸν ἕνα, ἐν τῷ περιτέμνεσθαι ἡμῶν πᾶν ἀρσενικόν, καθὰ καὶ αὐτοὶ περιτέτμηνται.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Unum est quo differtur tantum bonum: si circumcidamus masculos nostros, ritum gentis imitantes.

Spanish

Pero ellos aceptarán quedarse a vivir entre nosotros y ser un solo pueblo con una sola condición: que todos nuestros varones sean circuncidados, así como ellos lo están.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Mas con esta condición nos harán estos hombres el placer de habitar con nosotros, para que seamos un pueblo: si se circuncidare en nosotros todo varón, así como ellos son circuncidados.

English

But only on this condition will the men agree to dwell with us and be one people: if all our men are circumcised as they are.

What the text says

Summary

Genesis 34:22 records the condition set for the men of Shechem to live together with Jacob's family as a unified people: that every male among them undergo circumcision, matching the practice of Jacob's group. The verse is presented as a conditional statement introduced by a restrictive adverb.

Key words

  • 'akh- ("only", H0389) — a restrictive adverb that narrows the scope of what follows; it signals that a single, exclusive condition is being introduced.
  • ye.'O.tu ("they will agree", H0225) — niphal imperfect, third person masculine plural; the niphal stem here carries a reflexive/reciprocal sense of consenting or agreeing, and the imperfect aspect points to a future or not-yet-completed action.
  • la.Shevet ("to dwell", H3427) — qal infinitive construct with prefixed preposition le-, expressing purpose or result ("in order to dwell" / "to dwell").
  • hi.Mol ("has been circumcised", H4135A) — niphal infinitive construct, passive sense, functioning as a temporal clause with the prefixed be- ("when/in the circumcising").
  • ni.mo.Lim ("circumcised", H4135A) — niphal participle, masculine plural, describing an ongoing or characteristic state of Jacob's men, used in the comparative clause ka.'a.Sher ("just as", H0834D) + hem ("they", H1992).

What the text says

The sentence opens with 'akh-be-zot ("only in this"), a construction that isolates a single condition before naming it, creating suspense before the content of the agreement is stated. The main verb ye.'O.tu ("they will agree", H0225) governs two purpose infinitives: la.Shevet ("to dwell", H3427) and li.h.Yot ("to become", H1961), both qal infinitives construct linked by le-, describing the intended outcome — dwelling together and becoming 'am 'echad ("one people", H5971A + H0259).

The condition itself is expressed through a temporal clause built on the niphal infinitive hi.Mol ("has been circumcised", H4135A), preceded by be- ("when"), governing the object kol-zachar ("every male", H3605 + H2145). This clause is then compared to the existing state of the Shechemites through ka.'asher hem ni.mo.Lim ("just as they are circumcised"), where ni.mo.Lim is a niphal participle indicating a durative or characteristic condition rather than a single completed event. The grammar thus distinguishes between the future circumcision required of Jacob's men (infinitive, event-oriented) and the already-existing circumcised state of the Shechemites (participle, state-oriented).

Differences between versions

The LXX renders ye.'O.tu ("they will agree") with ὁμοιωθήσονται ("they will be made like/similar"), a verb of likeness rather than agreement, shifting the semantic focus from consent to resemblance. The Vulgate diverges further, omitting the third-person framing of the Hebrew and Greek altogether, instead phrasing the verse in first-person plural ("si circumcidamus... nostros"), presenting the condition as a direct proposal by Jacob's sons rather than as a report of what the Shechemites would require.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.