Genesis 34:2
וַיַּרְא אֹתָהּ שְׁכֶם בֶּן־חֲמוֹר הַֽחִוִּי נְשִׂיא הָאָרֶץ וַיִּקַּח אֹתָהּ וַיִּשְׁכַּב אֹתָהּ וַיְעַנֶּֽהָ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיַּ֨רְא אֹתָ֜הּ שְׁכֶ֧ם בֶּן־חֲמ֛וֹר הַֽחִוִּ֖י נְשִׂ֣יא הָאָ֑רֶץ וַיִּקַּ֥ח אֹתָ֛הּ וַיִּשְׁכַּ֥ב אֹתָ֖הּ וַיְעַנֶּֽהָ׃
καὶ ἴδεν αὐτὴν Συχὲμ ὁ υἱὸς Ἐμμὼρ ὁ Χορραῖος, ὁ ἄρχων τῆς γῆς· καὶ λαβὼν αὐτὴν ἐκοιμήθη μετ᾿ αὐτῆς, καὶ ἐταπείνωσεν αὐτήν.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Quam cum vidisset Sichem filius Hemor Hevæi, princeps terræ illius, adamavit eam: et rapuit, et dormivit cum illa, vi opprimens virginem.
Al verla, Siquén, hijo de Jamor el heveo, que era el jefe de aquella región, la agarró, se acostó con ella y la deshonró.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y vióla Sichêm, hijo de Hamor Heveo, príncipe de aquella tierra, y tomóla, y echóse con ella, y la deshonró.
When Shechem son of Hamor the Hivite, the prince of the region, saw her, he took her and lay with her by force.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Genesis 34:2 narrates four consecutive actions by Shechem toward Dinah: he saw her, took her, lay with her, and humiliated her. The verse is built as a chain of vav-consecutive verbs describing a rapid sequence of events, with no reported speech or reflection in between.
Key words
- yar' ("he saw", H7200G) — qal narrative form; opens the sequence, establishing sight as the trigger for the following actions.
- yiqqach ("he took", H3947G) — qal narrative form of the verb "to take"; parallels yar' in construction, showing the immediate next step.
- yishkav ("he lay with", H7901I) — qal narrative form; unlike the surrounding verbs, its object is marked not by the direct object marker but by the preposition 'otah ("with her", H0854), grammatically distinct from H0853 used elsewhere in the verse.
- y'anneha ("he humiliated her", H6031B) — piel (intensive) narrative form with pronominal suffix "her" (H9034) attached directly to the verb; the piel stem intensifies the basic root's meaning, commonly associated with degrees of force or affliction.
- nesi' ("chief of", H5387A) — masculine singular construct noun, forming a construct chain with ha'aretz ("the land", H0776G), identifying Hamor's social position.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence structure is a chain of four narrative (vav-consecutive) verbs — yar', yiqqach, yishkav, y'anneha — each introduced by the narrative va (H9001), which in Biblical Hebrew signals sequential action ("and then... and then..."). This creates a rapid, unembellished narrative rhythm: seeing leads immediately to taking, taking to lying with, and lying with to humiliating, without any intervening clause of motive, dialogue, or emotional description.
A grammatical detail not visible in translation is the shift in how "her" is marked as the object of each verb. In yar'ah ("he saw her") and yiqqachah ("he took her"), the pronoun is attached via the direct object marker 'oto (H0853). In yishkav, however, the same pronoun is introduced by the preposition 'et ("with", H0854) rather than the object marker — a distinct grammatical construction meaning "lay with her" rather than a direct transitive action on her. The final verb, y'anneha, is in the piel (intensive) stem, which intensifies the root idea beyond a simple qal action; the pronominal suffix "her" is attached directly to the verb form itself, without a separate object marker or preposition.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the Hebrew ha-Chivi ("the Hivite", H2340) as ho Chorraios ("the Horite"), a divergence in the ethnic designation of Hamor. The Vulgate inserts "adamavit eam" ("he loved/desired her"), a clause with no corresponding word in the Hebrew text, and adds "vi opprimens virginem" ("overpowering the virgin by force"), making explicit through added vocabulary what the Hebrew piel verb y'anneha leaves without an explicit term for force. The BSB and SBLIBRE similarly render y'anneha with explanatory phrases ("by force," "la deshonró") not present as separate lexical items in the Hebrew.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.