Genesis 34:14

וַיֹּאמְרוּ אֲלֵיהֶם לֹא נוּכַל לַעֲשׂוֹת הַדָּבָר הַזֶּה לָתֵת אֶת־אֲחֹתֵנוּ לְאִישׁ אֲשֶׁר־לוֹ עָרְלָה כִּֽי־חֶרְפָּה הִוא לָֽנוּ׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיֹּאמְר֣וּ אֲלֵיהֶ֗ם לֹ֤א נוּכַל֙ לַעֲשׂוֹת֙ הַדָּבָ֣ר הַזֶּ֔ה לָתֵת֙ אֶת־אֲחֹתֵ֔נוּ לְאִ֖ישׁ אֲשֶׁר־ל֣וֹ עָרְלָ֑ה כִּֽי־חֶרְפָּ֥ה הִ֖וא לָֽנוּ׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ εἶπαν αὐτοῖς καὶ Λευὶ οἱ ἀδελφοὶ Δεῖνας υἱοὶ δὲ Λείας Οὐ δυνησόμεθα ποιῆσαι τοῦτο, δοῦναι τὴν ἀδελφὴν ἡμῶν ἀνθρώπῳ ὃς ὦι ἀκροβυστίαν· ἔστιν γὰρ ὄνειδος ἡμῖν.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Non possumus facere quod petitis, nec dare sororem nostram homini incircumciso: quod illicitum et nefarium est apud nos.

Spanish

Les dijeron: “No podemos hacer eso. Entregar a nuestra hermana a un hombre incircunciso sería una vergüenza para nosotros.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y dijéronles: No podemos hacer esto de dar nuestra hermana á hombre que tiene prepucio; porque entre nosotros es abominación.

English

“ We cannot do such a thing,” they said. “ To give our sister to an uncircumcised man would be a disgrace to us.

What the text says

Summary

The sons of Jacob respond to the proposal to give their sister in marriage, declaring the act impossible because the man is uncircumcised. They state that such a marriage would constitute a cherpah ("reproach", H2781) for them.

Key words

  • nukhal ("we are able", H3201) — qal imperfect, first person plural: expresses an ongoing/future incapacity, "we cannot/we will not be able."
  • la'asot ("to do", H6213A) — qal infinitive with prefixed preposition la (H9005), marking purpose: "in order to do."
  • dabar ("thing", H1697I) — masculine singular noun with definite article ha (H9009), referring back to the previous proposal ("this thing/matter").
  • orlah ("foreskin", H6190H) — feminine singular noun, used to describe the physical condition of the prospective husband.
  • cherpah ("reproach", H2781) — feminine singular noun functioning as predicate nominative with the pronoun hi' ("she/it", H1931), stating what the action would constitute.

What the text says

The verse opens with the narrative va-yomeru ("and they said", H0559 with vav), continuing the sequential storyline. The subject "they" is unspecified in the Hebrew grammar itself (the verb form carries "they" as subject), and the text moves directly into direct speech introduced by lo' ("not", H3808) plus nukhal ("we are able", H3201), an imperfect verb giving the sense of an ongoing refusal rather than a single completed denial.

The clause la'asot ha-dabar ha-zeh ("to do this thing", H6213A + H1697I + H2088) sets up the general refusal, which is then specified by a second infinitive clause: latet et-achoteinu le-ish ("to give our sister to a man", H5414G + H0269 + H0376G). The relative clause asher lo orlah ("who has a foreskin", H0834A + H6190H) qualifies "man" by describing his uncircumcised physical state, using the possessive construction "to him [belongs] a foreskin" rather than a single adjective.

The final clause, introduced by ki ("for/because", H3588A), gives the reason: cherpah hi' lanu ("it is a reproach to us", H2781 + H1931 + H9035/9005). Here hi' ("it/she", H1931) functions as a copula linking the demonstrative situation to the predicate noun cherpah, and lanu ("to us", built from le + nu) marks the parties for whom this would hold true.

Differences between versions

The LXX inserts an identification of the speakers absent in the Hebrew: "Λευὶ οἱ ἀδελφοὶ Δείνας υἱοὶ δὲ Λείας" ("Levi, the brothers of Dinah, sons of Leah"), specifying who is speaking, whereas the Hebrew text leaves the subject of va-yomeru unnamed at this point. The Vulgate renders dabar ha-zeh ("this thing") as "quod petitis" ("what you ask"), making explicit a request that the Hebrew phrase leaves more generic. The Vulgate also adds "quod illicitum et nefarium est apud nos" ("which is unlawful and forbidden among us"), an expanded gloss on cherpah ("reproach", H2781) not present as separate wording in the Hebrew or the LXX's simpler "ὄνειδος" ("reproach").

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.