Genesis 33:15
וַיֹּאמֶר עֵשָׂו אַצִּֽיגָה־נָּא עִמְּךָ מִן־הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתִּי וַיֹּאמֶר לָמָּה זֶּה אֶמְצָא־חֵן בְּעֵינֵי אֲדֹנִֽי׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיֹּ֣אמֶר עֵשָׂ֔ו אַצִּֽיגָה־נָּ֣א עִמְּךָ֔ מִן־הָעָ֖ם אֲשֶׁ֣ר אִתִּ֑י וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ לָ֣מָּה זֶּ֔ה אֶמְצָא־חֵ֖ן בְּעֵינֵ֥י אֲדֹנִֽי׃
εἶπεν δὲ Ἠσαύ Καταω μετὰ σοῦ ἀπὸ τοῦ λαοῦ τοῦ μετ’ ἐμοῦ. ὁ δέ εἶπεν Ἵνα τί τοῦτο ; ἱκανὸν ὅτι εὗρον χάριν ἐναντίον σου, κύριε.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Respondit Esau: Oro te, ut de populo qui mecum est, saltem socii remaneant viæ tuæ. Non est, inquit, necesse: hoc uno tantum indigeo, ut inveniam gratiam in conspectu tuo, domine mi.
Esaú le ofreció: “Permíteme dejarte a algunos de mis hombres”. Pero Jacob le dijo: “¿Para qué molestarte? Me basta con haberte caído bien, mi señor”.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y Esaú dijo: Dejaré ahora contigo de la gente que viene conmigo. Y él dijo: ¿ Para qué esto? halle yo gracia en los ojos de mi señor.
“ Let me leave some of my people with you,” Esau said. But Jacob replied, “ Why do that? Let me find favor in the sight of my lord.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
Esau proposes to leave part of his retinue with Jacob, and an unnamed speaker (understood as Jacob) declines, asking why this would be needed and reaffirming that his aim is simply to gain favor in his lord's eyes.
Key words
- va-yomer ("and he said", H0559) — repeated twice (positions 2 and 15) as a narrative qal verb form, marking two speech turns without explicitly naming the second speaker.
- 'atzigah ("let me place", H3322) — hiphil (causative) form combined with the particle na ("please", H4994), expressing a polite request: "let me set/leave."
- 'em.tza' ("let me find", H4672) — qal imperfect, here functioning with volitive/cohortative force ("let me find") rather than simple future.
- chen ("favor", H2580) — masculine singular noun, object of the verb 'em.tza', forming the fixed idiom "to find favor."
- 'einei 'adoni ("eyes of my lord", H5869H + H0113 + H9020) — a construct chain: dual noun 'einei ("eyes of") governs 'adoni ("my lord," with 1st-person suffix), producing the idiom "in the eyes of my lord" = "in his sight/opinion."
What the text says
The verse is built as two parallel speech units, each introduced by va-yomer ("and he said", H0559). The first unit belongs explicitly to 'Esav ("Esau", H6215G), named as subject. The second unit repeats the identical verb form with no subject stated, so the identity of the second speaker must be inferred from the dialogue's content and from the surrounding narrative — the Hebrew grammar itself does not mark the shift in speaker.
Esau's offer uses the hiphil cohortative-style construction 'atzigah-na ("let me place, please", H3322 + H4994), softened by na, followed by the object phrase min-ha'am 'asher itti ("some of the people who are with me"), built with the relative particle 'asher ("which/who", H0834A) and the preposition 'itti ("with me", H0854 + suffix H9030).
The reply opens with the interrogative lamah zeh ("why this?", H4100 + H2088), a compact rhetorical question with no verb of its own, followed by 'emtza'-chen be'einei 'adoni ("let me find favor in the eyes of my lord"). The construct chain 'einei 'adoni places the dual noun "eyes" in construct with "my lord," so the sentence's real subject of concern is not the retinue itself but the speaker's standing in Esau's sight.
Differences between versions
The LXXSWETE text for Esau's line is abbreviated compared to the Hebrew, lacking a clear equivalent of 'atzigah-na and the relative clause 'asher itti; the surviving Greek reads simply "with you, from the people who [are] with me," omitting the request marker. For the second speech, the LXX renders lamah zeh ("why this?") as "ἵνα τί τοῦτο" (a comparable rhetorical question), but then adds "ἱκανὸν ὅτι" ("it is sufficient that") before "I have found favor," a phrase not present in the Hebrew. The Vulgate expands both speeches considerably: Esau's request becomes "ut de populo qui mecum est, saltem socii remaneant viae tuae" ("that at least companions from the people with me remain for your journey"), and the reply adds "Non est... necesse: hoc uno tantum indigeo" ("it is not necessary; I need only this one thing"), material with no counterpart in the Hebrew wording, which simply poses the question lamah zeh without such explanatory clauses.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.