Genesis 32:7
וַיִּירָא יַעֲקֹב מְאֹד וַיֵּצֶר לוֹ וַיַּחַץ אֶת־הָעָם אֲשֶׁר־אִתּוֹ וְאֶת־הַצֹּאן וְאֶת־הַבָּקָר וְהַגְּמַלִּים לִשְׁנֵי מַחֲנֽוֹת׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיִּירָ֧א יַעֲקֹ֛ב מְאֹ֖ד וַיֵּ֣צֶר ל֑וֹ וַיַּ֜חַץ אֶת־הָעָ֣ם אֲשֶׁר־אִתּ֗וֹ וְאֶת־הַצֹּ֧אן וְאֶת־הַבָּקָ֛ר וְהַגְּמַלִּ֖ים לִשְׁנֵ֥י מַחֲנֽוֹת׃
ἐφοβεῖτο Ἰακὼβ σφόδρα, καὶ ἡπορεῖτο· καὶ διεῖλεν τὸν λαὸν τὸν μετ’ αὐτοῦ καὶ τοὺς βόας καὶ τὰ πρόβατα εἰς δύο παρεμβολάς.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Timuit Jacob valde: et perterritus divisit populum qui secum erat, greges quoque et oves, et boves, et camelos, in duas turmas,
Jacob se llenó de mucho miedo y angustia. Entonces dividió en dos campamentos a la gente que lo acompañaba, y también a las ovejas, las vacas y los camellos.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Entonces Jacob tuvo gran temor, y angustióse; y partió el pueblo que tenía consigo, y las ovejas y las vacas y los camellos, en dos cuadrillas;
In great fear and distress, Jacob divided his people into two camps, as well as the flocks and herds and camels.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse reports three sequential actions of Jacob: he became greatly afraid, something like distress came upon him, and he then divided the people, flocks, herds, and camels traveling with him into two camps. The Hebrew presents these as a chain of narrative events rather than a single description of an emotional state followed by an action.
Key words
- va-yiyra' ("and he was afraid", H3372G) — qal narrative verb, first link in the vav-consecutive chain that opens the verse.
- va-yetzer ("and it was distress", H3334) — qal narrative verb, grammatically impersonal ("it distressed"), not "he felt distress" directly.
- lo ("to him", H9033 pronominal suffix attached to H9005) — dative construction receiving the action of yetzer, showing the distress as happening to Jacob rather than being an inner state he generates.
- va-yachatz ("and he divided", H2673) — qal narrative verb, third and final link in the chain, the concrete action resulting from the prior two states.
- li-shnei machanot ("into two of camps", H8147 construct + H4264) — construct numeral governing a plural feminine noun, specifying the division into exactly two groups.
What the text says
The verse is built on three consecutive vav-consecutive (narrative) verbs — va-yiyra', va-yetzer, va-yachatz — each introduced by the narrative vav (H9001), which chains events in sequence: fear happened, then distress happened, then Jacob acted by dividing. The second verb, yetzer (H3334), is not built with Jacob as active subject feeling something; grammatically it is impersonal, and Jacob appears only as the indirect object via the preposition-plus-suffix lo ("to him"). This differs from constructions where a person is the grammatical subject of an emotion-verb; here the emotion is presented as an event that occurs to Jacob.
The object of division lists four groups, each marked with the object marker 'et (H0853) — ha-'am ("the people"), ha-tzon ("the flock"), ha-baqar ("the herd") — except the final item, ha-gemalim ("the camels"), which is joined only by the conjunction ve- (H9002) without a repeated 'et. This shift in marking sets the camels apart syntactically from the first three items, though all four remain objects of the same verb va-yachatz.
Differences between versions
The LXX (Swete) renders the division clause as covering only τὸν λαὸν ("the people"), τοὺς βόας ("the oxen"), and τὰ πρόβατα ("the sheep") — camels are absent from this clause in the Greek text, though the Hebrew includes ha-gemalim ("the camels", H1581) among the divided groups. The Vulgate (Clementine), by contrast, includes "camelos" ("camels") alongside "greges," "oves," and "boves," matching the fourfold Hebrew list. The BSB compresses the Hebrew's three sequential verbs (yiyra', yetzer, yachatz) into a single English clause ("In great fear and distress, Jacob divided..."), representing the first two narrative actions as a prepositional phrase rather than as separate sequential events.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.