Genesis 32:2

וַיֹּאמֶר יַעֲקֹב כַּאֲשֶׁר רָאָם מַחֲנֵה אֱלֹהִים זֶה וַיִּקְרָא שֵֽׁם־הַמָּקוֹם הַהוּא מַֽחֲנָֽיִם׃ פ

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיֹּ֤אמֶר יַעֲקֹב֙ כַּאֲשֶׁ֣ר רָאָ֔ם מַחֲנֵ֥ה אֱלֹהִ֖ים זֶ֑ה וַיִּקְרָ֛א שֵֽׁם־הַמָּק֥וֹם הַה֖וּא מַֽחֲנָֽיִם׃ פ

Greek (Septuagint)

εἶπεν δὲ Ἰακώβ, ἡνίκα ἴδεν αὐτούς, Παρεμβολὴ θεοῦ αὕτη· καὶ ἐκάλεσεν τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ τόπου ἐκείνου Παπεμβολαί.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Quos cum vidisset, ait: Castra Dei sunt hæc: et appellavit nomen loci illius Mahanaim, id est, Castra.

Spanish

Al verlos, Jacob exclamó: “¡Este es el campamento de Dios!” Por eso llamó a aquel lugar Mahanaim.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y dijo Jacob cuando los vió: El campo de Dios es este: y llamó el nombre de aquel lugar Mahanaim.

English

When Jacob saw them, he said, “ This is the camp of God.” So he named that place Mahanaim.

What the text says

Summary

Jacob, upon seeing something (referred to by the pronominal suffix "them"), declares that the place is machaneh Elohim ("camp of God/gods"), and consequently names that location Machanayim. The verse records both his exclamation and his act of naming.

Key words

  • ka'asher ("when/just as", H0834D) — a relative/comparative particle that introduces the temporal clause "when he saw them," linking Jacob's speech directly to the act of seeing.
  • ra'am ("he saw them", H7200G + H9038) — qal perfect verb "he saw" with the third-person masculine plural pronominal suffix "them" attached, indicating a completed action whose object (the "them") is only referenced by the suffix, not named explicitly in this verse.
  • machaneh ("camp of", H4264) — a feminine singular noun in the construct state, meaning it must be followed by another noun to complete its meaning ("camp of X"), here followed by Elohim.
  • Elohim ("God", H0430G) — a masculine plural noun; in construct chains like this it commonly denotes the divine being (grammatically plural, semantically singular in many biblical contexts), completing the phrase "camp of God."
  • Machanayim ("Mahanaim", H4266) — a proper name built on the same root as machaneh ("camp"), but with a dual-type ending (-ayim), so the place-name itself echoes the word Jacob just used, suggesting a wordplay between "camp" (singular, used in his exclamation) and the place name's dual form.

What the text says

The verse is built as two linked narrative clauses joined by the narrative va- prefix (H9001), the standard Hebrew device for chaining sequential past events ("and then... and then..."). The first clause reports speech: va-yomer Ya'aqov ("and Jacob said"), followed by a subordinate clause introduced by ka'asher ("when/just as") plus ra'am ("he saw them"), which supplies the circumstance triggering the statement — though the identity of "them" is not restated in this verse itself, only carried by the suffix -m on ra'am.

Jacob's declared content is a short nominal sentence: machaneh Elohim zeh — literally "camp of God, this [is]." The construct pairing machaneh + Elohim has no verb "to be" in Hebrew (as is normal for equational sentences), and the demonstrative zeh ("this") functions as the subject, placed at the end for emphasis. The second clause repeats the va-narrative pattern with va-yiqra' ("and he called"), followed by shem ha-maqom ha-hu' ("the name of that place") and the name itself, Machanayim. The name shares its root (מחנה, "camp") with the word Jacob used in his exclamation, so the naming clause reflects back on the content of his speech, though the dual-like ending of Machanayim is not explained within this verse.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders Elohim as θεοῦ ("of God," singular genitive), matching the Vulgate's Dei ("of God"), both narrowing the grammatically plural Hebrew Elohim to a singular referent in translation. The Vulgate adds an explanatory gloss, id est, Castra ("that is, Camp[s]"), making explicit the wordplay between Machanayim and machaneh that the Hebrew text only shows through shared root letters, without commentary.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.