Genesis 31:52

עֵד הַגַּל הַזֶּה וְעֵדָה הַמַּצֵּבָה אִם־אָנִי לֹֽא־אֶֽעֱבֹר אֵלֶיךָ אֶת־הַגַּל הַזֶּה וְאִם־אַתָּה לֹא־תַעֲבֹר אֵלַי אֶת־הַגַּל הַזֶּה וְאֶת־הַמַּצֵּבָה הַזֹּאת לְרָעָֽה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

עֵ֚ד הַגַּ֣ל הַזֶּ֔ה וְעֵדָ֖ה הַמַּצֵּבָ֑ה אִם־אָ֗נִי לֹֽא־אֶֽעֱבֹ֤ר אֵלֶ֙יךָ֙ אֶת־הַגַּ֣ל הַזֶּ֔ה וְאִם־אַ֠תָּה לֹא־תַעֲבֹ֨ר אֵלַ֜י אֶת־הַגַּ֥ל הַזֶּ֛ה וְאֶת־הַמַּצֵּבָ֥ה הַזֹּ֖את לְרָעָֽה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ἐάν τε γὰρ ἐγὼ μὴ διαβῶ πρὸς σέ, μηδὲ σὺ διαβῇς πρὸς μὲ τὸν βουνὸν τοῦ. ’τον καὶ τὴν στήλην ταύτην ἐπὶ κακίᾳ.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

testis erit: tumulus, inquam, iste et lapis sint in testimonium, si aut ego transiero illum pergens ad te, aut tu præterieris, malum mihi cogitans.

Spanish

Que este montón y este pilar nos sirvan de testigos de que yo no pasaré de aquí para hacerte daño, y de que tú tampoco pasarás de aquí para hacerme daño.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Testigo sea este majano, y testigo sea este título, que ni yo pasaré contra ti este majano, ni tú pasarás contra mí este majano ni este título, para mal.

English

This mound is a witness, and this pillar is a witness, that I will not go past this mound to harm you, and you will not go past this mound and pillar to harm me.

What the text says

Summary

Jacob declares that the stone heap and the standing pillar serve as witnesses to a mutual boundary agreement with Laban: neither party will cross this marker against the other with hostile intent. The verse uses a double "witness" formula and a reciprocal oath structure.

Key words

  • 'ed ("witness", H5707) — masculine noun, agreeing grammatically with the masculine gal ("heap", H1530G).
  • 'edah ("witness", H5713A) — feminine noun, agreeing with the feminine matstsevah ("pillar", H4676); the same concept "witness" appears in two grammatical genders to match each physical object.
  • 'e'evor / ta'avor ("I will pass beyond" / "you will pass beyond", both H5674A) — qal imperfect forms of the same verb, first in 1st person then in 2nd person masculine, creating a mirrored oath.
  • 'im ("if", H0518I) — the conditional particle introducing each half of the oath, structuring the sentence as two parallel negative conditions.
  • ra'ah ("harm", H7451C) — feminine noun governed by the preposition le ("for", H9005), stating the purpose the crossing must not serve.

What the text says

The sentence opens with two short nominal clauses lacking an explicit verb "to be": 'ed haGal hazzeh ("[a] witness [is] this heap") and ve'edah hammatsevah ("and [a] witness [is] the pillar"). Hebrew marks agreement between "witness" and its subject by gender: the masculine 'ed pairs with the masculine gal, and the feminine 'edah pairs with the feminine matstsevah. This grammatical pairing is not reproducible in English or Spanish translations, which use "witness" once or twice without gender distinction.

The oath itself is built as two symmetrical conditional clauses, each introduced by 'im ("if") and negated by lo' ("not", H3808), with the same verb 'avor ("to pass beyond") inflected first for "I" ('e'evor) and then for "you" (ta'avor). This mirrors the reciprocal nature of the agreement: neither party permitted to cross toward the other. Both clauses end with the object marker 'et preceding "this heap," and the second clause adds "and this pillar," before the final purpose phrase le-ra'ah ("for harm"), which qualifies the forbidden act of crossing as one done with hostile intent rather than crossing as such.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew presents two distinct witness-nouns ('ed, masculine; 'edah, feminine) tied to gender-matched objects. The Vulgate renders this with a single statement, "testis erit... sint in testimonium," collapsing the double gendered formula into one witness concept for both objects. The provided LXX fragment omits the initial witness clause altogether and begins directly with the conditional oath (ἐάν τε γὰρ...), differing structurally from the Hebrew's opening nominal declarations.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.