Genesis 3:7
וַתִּפָּקַחְנָה עֵינֵי שְׁנֵיהֶם וַיֵּדְעוּ כִּי עֵֽירֻמִּם הֵם וַֽיִּתְפְּרוּ עֲלֵה תְאֵנָה וַיַּעֲשׂוּ לָהֶם חֲגֹרֹֽת׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַתִּפָּקַ֙חְנָה֙ עֵינֵ֣י שְׁנֵיהֶ֔ם וַיֵּ֣דְע֔וּ כִּ֥י עֵֽירֻמִּ֖ם הֵ֑ם וַֽיִּתְפְּרוּ֙ עֲלֵ֣ה תְאֵנָ֔ה וַיַּעֲשׂ֥וּ לָהֶ֖ם חֲגֹרֹֽת׃
καὶ διηνοίχθησαν οἱ ὀφθαλμοὶ τῶν δύο, καὶ ἔγνωσαν ὅτι γυμνοὶ ήσαν· καὶ ἔρραψαν φύλλα συκῆς καὶ ἐποίησαν ἑαυτοῖς περιζώματα.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Et aperti sunt oculi amborum; cumque cognovissent se esse nudos, consuerunt folia ficus, et fecerunt sibi perizomata.
En ese momento se les abrirán los ojos y se dieron cuenta de que estaban desnudos. Entonces cosieron hojas de higuera para cubrirse.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y fueron abiertos los ojos de entrambos, y conocieron que estaban desnudos: entonces cosieron hojas de higuera, y se hicieron delantales.
And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; so they sewed together fig leaves and made coverings for themselves. God Arraigns Adam and Eve
✦ What the text says
Summary
Genesis 3:7 narrates four sequential actions joined by narrative vav forms: the eyes of both persons are opened, they perceive their nakedness, and they respond by sewing fig leaves and making coverings for themselves.
Key words
- tippaqachnah ("they were opened", H6491) — niphal (passive/reflexive) verb, third person feminine plural, agreeing with 'einei ("eyes"). The niphal stem indicates the eyes undergo the action rather than performing it.
- va-yede'u ("and they knew", H3045) — qal narrative verb, third person masculine plural, continuing the narrative chain after the vav.
- 'eirummim ("naked", H5903) — masculine plural adjective, predicate describing the subject hem ("they", H1992) in the clause introduced by ki ("that", H3588A).
- va-yitpheru ("and they sewed together", H8609) — qal narrative verb, third masculine plural, marking the next event in sequence.
- chagorot ("loin coverings", H2290B) — feminine plural noun, the object produced by va-ya'asu ("and they made", H6213H), governed by the preposition la-hem ("for themselves", H9005+H9038).
What the text says
The verse is built as a chain of four narrative (wayyiqtol) verb forms, each introduced by the vav marked H9001, which in Biblical Hebrew narrative sequence signals successive events: "and-opened," "and-knew," "and-sewed," "and-made." This chaining structure produces a rapid sequence without explicit connectors like "then" or "so" in the underlying grammar — those words appear only in translations that render the narrative flow into target-language conjunctions.
The first verb, tippaqachnah (H6491), is in the niphal stem, marking the eyes as the grammatical subject undergoing the opening rather than an agent opening them. The dual/plural agreement pattern is worth noting: 'einei (H5869A) is dual construct ("eyes of"), followed by shenei-hem (H8147+H9028), also dual construct, meaning "the two of them" — the phrase literally reads "the eyes of the two of them."
The subordinate clause introduced by ki (H3588A) contains no verb "to be" in Hebrew; the predicate 'eirummim ("naked," H5903, masculine plural adjective) stands directly with the pronoun hem ("they," H1992), a standard nominal-clause construction. The final two verbs, va-yitpheru (H8609) and va-ya'asu (H6213H), share the same grammatical form (qal narrative, third masculine plural) and describe the manufacture of chagorot (H2290B) from 'aleh te'enah ("leafage of a fig tree," H5929 construct + H8384).
Differences between versions
The LXX renders chagorot (H2290B, "loin coverings") as περιζώματα, and the Vulgate as perizomata — both borrowing or transliterating the Greek term rather than using a native Latin/Greek word for "covering." The Vulgate restructures the syntax with cumque cognovissent ("and when they had recognized"), introducing a temporal subordination not marked by a distinct grammatical form in the Hebrew narrative chain, where va-yede'u (H3045) simply continues the sequence of wayyiqtol verbs.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.