Genesis 29:3
וְנֶאֶסְפוּ־שָׁמָּה כָל־הָעֲדָרִים וְגָלֲלוּ אֶת־הָאֶבֶן מֵעַל פִּי הַבְּאֵר וְהִשְׁקוּ אֶת־הַצֹּאן וְהֵשִׁיבוּ אֶת־הָאֶבֶן עַל־פִּי הַבְּאֵר לִמְקֹמָֽהּ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְנֶאֶסְפוּ־שָׁ֣מָּה כָל־הָעֲדָרִ֗ים וְגָלֲל֤וּ אֶת־הָאֶ֙בֶן֙ מֵעַל֙ פִּ֣י הַבְּאֵ֔ר וְהִשְׁק֖וּ אֶת־הַצֹּ֑אן וְהֵשִׁ֧יבוּ אֶת־הָאֶ֛בֶן עַל־פִּ֥י הַבְּאֵ֖ר לִמְקֹמָֽהּ׃
καὶ συνήγοντο ἐκεῖ πάντα τὰ ποίμνια, καὶ ἀπεκύλιον τὸν λίθον ἀπὸ τοῦ στόματος τοῦ φρέατος, καὶ ἐπότιζον τὰ πρόβατα, καὶ ἀπεκαθίστων τὸν λίθον ἐπὶ τὸ στόμα τοῦ φρέατος εἰς τὸν τόπον αὐτοῦ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Morisque erat ut cunctis ovibus congregatis devolverent lapidem, et refectis gregibus rursum super os putei ponerent.
Cuando se juntaban allí todos los rebaños, los pastores quitaban la piedra de la boca del pozo para dar de beber a las ovejas, y luego volvían a poner la piedra en su lugar.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y juntábanse allí todos los rebaños; y revolvían la piedra de sobre la boca del pozo, y abrevaban las ovejas; y volvían la piedra sobre la boca del pozo á su lugar.
When all the flocks had been gathered there, the shepherds would roll away the stone from the mouth of the well and water the sheep. Then they would return the stone to its place over the mouth of the well.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Genesis 29:3 describes the customary procedure at the well: once all the flocks had gathered there, the stone covering the well's mouth was rolled away, the sheep were watered, and the stone was returned to its place. The verse uses four consecutive verbs describing this as a recurring practice rather than a single event.
Key words
- ne'esfu ("they were gathered", H0622) — niphal (passive) sequential perfect; the flocks are the grammatical subject of a passive action, not an agent performing it.
- galalu ("they rolled", H1556) — qal sequential perfect; simple active verb, subject unspecified in the Hebrew (no explicit "shepherds").
- hishku ("they watered", H8248) — hiphil (causative) sequential perfect; literally "they caused [the sheep] to drink."
- heshivu ("they put back", H7725) — hiphil (causative) sequential perfect; literally "they caused [the stone] to return" to its place.
- limqomah ("to its place", H4725 + H9024) — construct noun with feminine pronominal suffix "her/its," referring back to ha'even ("the stone"), a feminine noun.
What the text says
The verse chains four verbs together using the vav-consecutive (sequential) perfect construction: ne'esfu, galalu, hishku, heshivu. In Biblical Hebrew narrative, this chain typically marks sequential past events ("and then... and then..."), but in a context like this—describing a recurring practice at the well rather than a single dated occurrence—the same verb forms carry an iterative or habitual sense: "they would gather... they would roll... they would water... they would put back." The Hebrew grammar does not mark this habituality with a separate word; it is inferred from context and from the fact that Jacob is being told how things normally work at this well, immediately before the narrative resumes with a single, non-habitual event (his own rolling of the stone in v.10).
No explicit subject such as "shepherds" appears in the Hebrew for any of these four verbs; the third-person plural verb forms leave the agents implicit, understood from the surrounding conversation with the shepherds Jacob has just addressed.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the four Hebrew sequential perfects with Greek imperfect-tense verbs (συνήγοντο, ἀπεκύλιον, ἐπότιζον, ἀπεκαθίστων), a tense that in Greek naturally expresses ongoing or habitual past action, aligning with the iterative sense of the Hebrew construction.
The Vulgate adds an explanatory clause not present in the Hebrew text, "Morisque erat" ("and it was the custom"), making explicit the habitual nature that the Hebrew conveys only through verb form and context.
The BSB and SBLIBRE translations insert an explicit subject, "the shepherds," and use "would" (BSB) or descriptive imperfect tense (SBLIBRE: "quitaban," "volvían") to render this same habitual sense, where the Hebrew subject remains grammatically unstated.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.