Genesis 28:15
וְהִנֵּה אָנֹכִי עִמָּךְ וּשְׁמַרְתִּיךָ בְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר־תֵּלֵךְ וַהֲשִׁבֹתִיךָ אֶל־הָאֲדָמָה הַזֹּאת כִּי לֹא אֶֽעֱזָבְךָ עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם־עָשִׂיתִי אֵת אֲשֶׁר־דִּבַּרְתִּי לָֽךְ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְהִנֵּ֨ה אָנֹכִ֜י עִמָּ֗ךְ וּשְׁמַרְתִּ֙יךָ֙ בְּכֹ֣ל אֲשֶׁר־תֵּלֵ֔ךְ וַהֲשִׁ֣בֹתִ֔יךָ אֶל־הָאֲדָמָ֖ה הַזֹּ֑את כִּ֚י לֹ֣א אֶֽעֱזָבְךָ֔ עַ֚ד אֲשֶׁ֣ר אִם־עָשִׂ֔יתִי אֵ֥ת אֲשֶׁר־דִּבַּ֖רְתִּי לָֽךְ׃
καὶ ἰδοὺ ἐγὼ μετὰ σοῦ, διαφυλάσσων σε ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ πόσῃ οὗ ἐὰν πορευθῇς· καὶ ἀποστρέψω σε εἰς τὴν γῆν ταύτην, ὅτι οὐ μή σε ἕως τοῦ ποιῆσαί με πάντα ὅσα ἐλάλησά σοι.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Et ero custos tuus quocumque perrexeris, et reducam te in terram hanc: nec dimittam nisi complevero universa quæ dixi.
Yo estoy contigo; te protegeré por dondequiera que vayas y te traeré de vuelta a esta tierra. No te abandonaré hasta cumplir con todo lo que te he prometido”.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y he aquí, yo soy contigo, y te guardaré por donde quiera que fueres, y te volveré á esta tierra; porque no te dejaré hasta tanto que haya hecho lo que te he dicho.
Look, I am with you, and I will watch over you wherever you go, and I will bring you back to this land. For I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
This verse records a divine promise of ongoing presence, protection, and eventual return to the land, framed as an assurance that will not fail until it is fully carried out. The speaker uses first-person perfect verbs to present future actions as guaranteed accomplishments, and closes with a formula binding the promise to what has already been spoken.
Key words
- hinneh ("here!", H2009) — presentative interjection introducing the divine declaration, drawing attention to the immediacy of the statement that follows.
- 'anokhi ("I", H0595) — emphatic independent pronoun; not required by the verb form, so its presence highlights the subject's identity.
- shamarti ("I will protect", H8104H) — qal sequential perfect; grammatically a "completed" form used to continue a future narrative sequence begun by the preceding clause.
- hashivoti ("I will bring back", H7725G) — hiphil (causative) sequential perfect; the causative stem marks the subject as actively causing the return, not merely accompanying it.
- dibarti ("I have spoken", H1696I) — piel perfect, a true completed action, anchoring the promise to prior speech already uttered.
What the text says
The sentence opens with hinneh followed by the independent pronoun 'anokhi, a construction that foregrounds the speaker before the predicate "with you" ('immakh) is given. This is not a simple existential statement but an emphatic self-presentation. The following verbs — shamarti and hashivoti — are grammatically perfect in form yet function as sequential (future-continuing) perfects, a common device in Biblical Hebrew narrative and prophetic/promissory speech where a chain of "vav + perfect" verbs extends a future action already set up by the initial nominal clause.
The negative clause lo' 'e'ezavekha ("I will not abandon you") is qualified by the compound construction 'ad 'asher 'im — literally "until that if" — a doubled subordinating idiom that in Biblical Hebrew intensifies the "until" clause, tying the cessation of divine presence strictly to the completion of what was promised. The closing clause repeats 'asher ("that/which") governing dibarti ("I have spoken"), a true perfect referring to speech already given, so the promise's fulfillment is explicitly measured against prior words, not open-ended.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the "wherever you go" clause with the added noun ὁδῷ ("way/road"), producing "in every way where you may go," an explicit path-image not present as a separate lexical item in the Hebrew kol 'asher telekh ("all where you go"). The Vulgate compresses the initial two Hebrew clauses (hinneh 'anokhi 'immakh and shamarti) into a single predicate, "ero custos tuus" ("I will be your guardian"), rendering as a noun-based promise rather than preserving the separate presentative hinneh clause found in the Hebrew.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.