Genesis 24:16

וְהַֽנַּעֲרָ טֹבַת מַרְאֶה מְאֹד בְּתוּלָה וְאִישׁ לֹא יְדָעָהּ וַתֵּרֶד הָעַיְנָה וַתְּמַלֵּא כַדָּהּ וַתָּֽעַל׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְהַֽנַּעֲרָ֗ טֹבַ֤ת מַרְאֶה֙ מְאֹ֔ד בְּתוּלָ֕ה וְאִ֖ישׁ לֹ֣א יְדָעָ֑הּ וַתֵּ֣רֶד הָעַ֔יְנָה וַתְּמַלֵּ֥א כַדָּ֖הּ וַתָּֽעַל׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ἠ δὲ παρθένος ἦν καλὴ τῇ ὄψει σφόδρα. παρθένος ἦν, ἀνὴρ οὐκ ἔγνω αὐτήν. καταβᾶσα δὲ ἐπὶ τὴν πηγὴν ἔπλησεν τὴν ὑδρίαν αὐτῆς, καὶ ἀνέβη.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

puella decora nimis, virgoque pulcherrima, et incognita viro: descenderat autem ad fontem, et impleverat hydriam, ac revertebatur.

Spanish

La joven era muy hermosa; era virgen, ningún hombre la había tocado. Bajó hasta el manantial, llenó su cántaro y volvió a subir.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y la moza era de muy hermoso aspecto, virgen, á la que varón no había conocido; la cual descendió á la fuente, y llenó su cántaro, y se volvía.

English

Now the girl was very beautiful, a virgin who had not had relations with any man. She went down to the spring, filled her jar, and came up again.

What the text says

Summary

The verse describes the young woman (Rebekah, introduced in the preceding verses) through a series of physical and moral qualifications, then narrates her actions: she goes down to the spring, fills her jar, and comes back up.

Key words

  • na'arah ("young woman", H5291) — feminine singular noun, the subject of the whole description.
  • tovat ("good of", H2896A) — feminine singular adjective in construct form, linking directly to mar'eh, producing the sense "good of appearance."
  • mar'eh ("appearance", H4758) — masculine singular noun, the quality specified by the construct adjective.
  • betulah ("virgin", H1330) — feminine singular noun, a second, separate qualification added after "very good of appearance."
  • yeda'ah ("he had known her", H3045 + H9034) — qal perfect verb with pronominal suffix, negated by lo' ("not", H3808), indicating a completed state of non-relation.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence opens with a nominal, non-verbal description before switching to narrative verbs. The construct phrase tovat mar'eh ("good of appearance") uses the adjective tovat (H2896A) in construct state directly governing the noun mar'eh (H4758), a common Hebrew way to attribute a quality without a linking verb — literally "good of appearance," rendered idiomatically as "of good/beautiful appearance." This is intensified by me'od ("exceedingly", H3966). Separately, the noun betulah (H1330) reasserts virginity, followed by the negated statement ve'ish lo' yeda'ah — "and a man had not known her" — using the qal perfect of yada' (H3045) with the third-person feminine singular suffix -ah (H9034) attached directly to the verb, meaning "known her." This construction pairs two distinct terms, na'arah and betulah, with the negated yada' clause, producing a layered description rather than a single term for virginity.

The narrative then shifts to a chain of three consecutive qal/piel verbs joined by the narrative vav (H9001): tered ("she went down", H3381), temalle' ("she filled", H4390, piel), and ta'al ("she came up", H5927G). This vav-consecutive chain marks sequential action, each verb attached to the next event without additional connectors, a typical feature of Biblical Hebrew narrative style. The directional suffix -ah on ha'aynah ("towards the spring", H5869M + H9011) indicates movement toward the spring, a nuance not always rendered explicitly in translation.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders the Hebrew's twofold description (na'arah... betulah) with two separate uses of παρθένος ("virgin"), stating "she was a virgin" twice, where the Hebrew uses two different words, na'arah (H5291, "young woman") and betulah (H1330, "virgin"). The Vulgate similarly uses "virgo" and "puella" as two terms, paralleling the Hebrew's two-term structure differently. The Vulgate adds "autem" and past-perfect verb forms ("descenderat," "impleverat," "revertebatur"), presenting the actions as background narration rather than the sequential vav-consecutive chain seen in the Hebrew.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.