Genesis 19:10
וַיִּשְׁלְחוּ הָֽאֲנָשִׁים אֶת־יָדָם וַיָּבִיאוּ אֶת־לוֹט אֲלֵיהֶם הַבָּיְתָה וְאֶת־הַדֶּלֶת סָגָֽרוּ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיִּשְׁלְח֤וּ הָֽאֲנָשִׁים֙ אֶת־יָדָ֔ם וַיָּבִ֧יאוּ אֶת־ל֛וֹט אֲלֵיהֶ֖ם הַבָּ֑יְתָה וְאֶת־הַדֶּ֖לֶת סָגָֽרוּ׃
ἐκτείναντες δὲ οἱ ἄνδρες τὰς χεῖρας εἰσεσπάσαντο τὸν Λὼτ πρὸς ἑαυτοὺς εἰς τὸν οἶκον, καὶ τὴν θύραν τοῦ οἴκου ἀπέκλεισαν·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Et ecce miserunt manum viri, et introduxerunt ad se Lot, clauseruntque ostium:
Pero los hombres que estaban adentro extendieron los brazos, metieron a Lot en la casa y cerraron la puerta.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Entonces los varones alargaron la mano, y metieron á Lot en casa con ellos, y cerraron las puertas.
But the men inside reached out, pulled Lot into the house with them, and shut the door.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Genesis 19:10 narrates how "the men" inside the house reach out, pull Lot in with them, and close the door behind him. The verse uses three sequential verbs in the Hebrew narrative chain to depict rapid, decisive action.
Key words
- va-yishlechu ("and they stretched out", H7971) — qal narrative form; the vav-consecutive links this action as the first event in the sequence, "and then they stretched out."
- yadam ("their hand", H3027) — singular noun with plural suffix "their"; Hebrew idiom uses the singular yad even for multiple people acting together, unlike English "hands."
- va-yavi'u ("and they brought/caused to enter", H0935) — hiphil (causative) narrative form; the causative stem indicates the men caused Lot to come in, i.e., "pulled him in," rather than Lot entering on his own.
- ha-baytah ("toward the house", H1004 + directional he) — the suffix -ah (H9011) marks direction "toward the house," reinforcing motion inward.
- sagaru ("they closed", H5462) — qal perfect (completed action), contrasting with the preceding narrative-chain verbs; it marks the final, completed state after the sequence of actions.
What the text says
The verse is built on a chain of three actions connected by the narrative vav construction (va-yishlechu, va-yavi'u), typical of Biblical Hebrew storytelling, where each verb form signals "and then this happened" in sequence. The subject throughout is ha-anashim ("the men", H0582), left unspecified in this verse itself as to their nature — simply "the men" with the definite article, referring back to characters already introduced in the narrative.
The use of the hiphil stem in va-yavi'u ("they caused to come/brought") is significant: it is not a simple "they entered" (qal) but a causative action — the men caused Lot to enter, implying they acted upon him rather than he acting himself. This aligns with the physical action described in the prior clause, where yadam ("their hand") is stretched out (va-yishlechu) — the singular yad covering the collective "hand" of multiple men, a common Hebrew idiom not requiring a plural form to indicate multiple hands.
The final clause shifts grammatical aspect: sagaru ("they closed") is a qal perfect, not another narrative-chain form, marking this as the concluding, completed action — the door is shut, ending the sequence of movement with a static result.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the sequence with participles and finite verbs (ἐκτείναντες... εἰσεσπάσαντο... ἀπέκλεισαν, "having stretched out... they drew in... they shut"), using εἰσεσπάσαντο ("drew in," a strong "pulling" verb) for the Hebrew hiphil va-yavi'u, which may emphasize forceful drawing-in more explicitly than the Hebrew's general causative "brought." The LXX also adds τοῦ οἴκου ("of the house") after θύραν ("door"), specifying "the door of the house," where the Hebrew simply has ha-delet ("the door", H1817) without further qualification. The Vulgate's introduxerunt ("they led in") corresponds to the causative sense of va-yavi'u but lacks the physical "pulling" nuance found in the LXX's εἰσεσπάσαντο.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.