Genesis 18:8

וַיִּקַּח חֶמְאָה וְחָלָב וּבֶן־הַבָּקָר אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה וַיִּתֵּן לִפְנֵיהֶם וְהֽוּא־עֹמֵד עֲלֵיהֶם תַּחַת הָעֵץ וַיֹּאכֵֽלוּ׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיִּקַּ֨ח חֶמְאָ֜ה וְחָלָ֗ב וּבֶן־הַבָּקָר֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר עָשָׂ֔ה וַיִּתֵּ֖ן לִפְנֵיהֶ֑ם וְהֽוּא־עֹמֵ֧ד עֲלֵיהֶ֛ם תַּ֥חַת הָעֵ֖ץ וַיֹּאכֵֽלוּ׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ἑλαβεν δὲ βούτυρον καὶ γάλα καὶ τὸ μοσχάριον ὃ ἐποίησεν, κα παρέθηκεν αὐτοῖς, καὶ ἐφάγοσαν· αὐτὸς δὲ παρειστήκει αὐτοῖς ὑπὸ τὸ δένδρον.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Tulit quoque butyrum et lac, et vitulum quem coxerat, et posuit coram eis: ipse vero stabat juxta eos sub arbore.

Spanish

También tomó cuajada, leche y el ternero recién preparado, y se lo sirvió. Mientras ellos comían, él se quedó de pie junto a ellos debajo del árbol.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Tomó también manteca y leche, y el becerro que había aderezado, y púsolo delante de ellos; y él estaba junto á ellos debajo del árbol; y comieron.

English

Then Abraham brought curds and milk and the calf that had been prepared, and he set them before the men and stood by them under the tree as they ate. Sarah Laughs at the Promise

What the text says

Summary

Genesis 18:8 describes the host bringing curds, milk, and a prepared calf to his guests, setting the food before them, and remaining standing near them under a tree while they ate. The verse combines a chain of narrative actions with one clause that breaks the narrative flow to describe a simultaneous state.

Key words

  • yiqqach ("he brought/took", H3947G) — qal narrative form, the first in a chain of sequential past actions marked by the narrative vav.
  • ben-habbaqar ("the young one of the herd", H1121H + H1241) — a construct phrase, literally "son of the herd," functioning as the term for a calf.
  • asah ("he had prepared", H6213H) — qal perfect inside a relative clause introduced by asher ("which", H0834A); the perfect indicates an action completed before the main narrative moment.
  • hu omed ("he [was] standing", H1931 + H5975G) — personal pronoun followed by a qal participle; this construction, introduced by a non-narrative vav, shifts from sequential action to a description of ongoing state.
  • vayyokhelu ("they ate", H0398) — final qal narrative verb, third-person plural, closing the sequence of actions begun with yiqqach.

What the text says

The verse is built on a backbone of narrative-vav verbs — yiqqach ("he brought"), yitten ("he set"), and vayyokhelu ("they ate") — each marking a discrete step in the sequence of hospitality actions performed by the subject (unnamed by pronoun here, referring back to Abraham from context). Embedded in this chain is the relative clause asher asah ("which he had prepared"), using a perfect verb to indicate that the preparation of the calf occurred prior to the moment of serving, rather than being part of the ongoing sequence.

The clause vehu omed aleihem tachat ha'etz ("and he was standing by them under the tree") breaks from the narrative-vav pattern. Instead of another sequential verb, the Hebrew uses a conjunction plus pronoun plus participle (hu omed), a construction that in Biblical Hebrew typically signals a circumstantial or background description — the standing is presented as a state accompanying the meal, not as another step in the action sequence. This grammatical shift is not visible in translations that render all verbs uniformly as past-tense actions.

Differences between versions

The LXX and Vulgate render ben-habbaqar ("young one of the herd") as a single term — μοσχάριον and vitulum, both meaning "calf" — collapsing the Hebrew construct phrase into one word. The LXX also reorders the final clauses: it places ἐφάγοσαν ("they ate") before αὐτὸς δὲ παρειστήκει ("but he stood"), whereas the Hebrew places the standing-participle clause (vehu omed) before the final verb vayyokhelu ("they ate"). The Vulgate follows the Hebrew order, placing stabat ("he was standing") after the serving and before mention of eating, though the Vulcate/Clementine text given here does not explicitly state "they ate" as a separate clause.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.