Genesis 14:19
וַֽיְבָרְכֵהוּ וַיֹּאמַר בָּרוּךְ אַבְרָם לְאֵל עֶלְיוֹן קֹנֵה שָׁמַיִם וָאָֽרֶץ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַֽיְבָרְכֵ֖הוּ וַיֹּאמַ֑ר בָּר֤וּךְ אַבְרָם֙ לְאֵ֣ל עֶלְי֔וֹן קֹנֵ֖ה שָׁמַ֥יִם וָאָֽרֶץ׃
καὶ ηὐλόγησεν τὸν Ἀβρὰμ καὶ εἶπεν Εὐλογημένος Ἀβρὰμ τῷ θεῷ τῷ ὑψίστῳ, ὃς ἔκτισεν τὸν οὐρανὸν καὶ τὴν γῆν·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
benedixit ei, et ait: Benedictus Abram Deo excelso, qui creavit cælum et terram:
bendijo a Abram con estas palabras: “¡Que te bendiga el Dios Altísimo, creador del cielo y de la tierra!
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y bendíjole, y dijo: Bendito sea Abram del Dios alto, poseedor de los cielos y de la tierra;
and he blessed Abram and said: “ Blessed be Abram by God Most High, Creator of heaven and earth,
✦ What the text says
Summary
This verse records Melchizedek's blessing of Abram, pronounced in direct speech. It identifies the deity invoked as El Elyon ("God Most High", H0410J/H5945H), described as the one who possesses or creates heaven and earth.
Key words
- va-y'varekhehu ("and he blessed him", H1288) — piel verb with narrative vav and pronominal suffix "him"; the piel stem intensifies the action of blessing, and the narrative form situates it as a discrete event following the prior clause.
- barukh ("blessed", H1288) — qal passive participle, masculine singular; unlike the finite verb in word 2, this is a participial adjective describing Abram's state as one who is blessed, not an ongoing action.
- El Elyon ("God Most High", H0410J + H5945H) — noun plus adjective, both masculine singular; Elyon modifies El to specify a particular epithet for the deity.
- qoneh ("creator/possessor of", H7069) — qal participle, masculine singular, in construct state; construct form binds it grammatically to shamayim ("heaven", H8064), producing "one who creates/possesses heaven."
- shamayim va-aretz ("heaven and earth", H8064 + H0776G) — noun pair joined by conjunction va (H9002); shamayim is plural in form, aretz is feminine singular, together forming a merism for the totality of creation.
What the text says
The verse opens with two narrative verbs in sequence — va-y'varekhehu ("and he blessed him", H1288) and va-yomar ("and he said", H0559) — both qal/piel forms with the narrative vav that Hebrew uses to advance a storyline action by action. The first verb reports the act of blessing; the second introduces the content of that blessing as direct speech.
The blessing itself begins with barukh ("blessed", H1288), a passive participle rather than a finite verb, which functions here as a predicate adjective applied to Abram ("Abram", H0087): Abram is described as being in a blessed state, without a finite tense component. The agent or source of this blessed state is marked by the preposition le ("by", H9005) attached to El Elyon ("God Most High", H0410J + H5945H), a compound divine title combining a general noun for deity with an adjective of superiority.
The final phrase, qoneh shamayim va-aretz ("creator of heaven and earth", H7069 + H8064 + H0776G), uses a participle in construct state to link the divine epithet directly to a description of that deity's relationship to the cosmos. The construct chain qoneh shamayim ("creator of heaven") is extended by the conjunction va ("and", H9002) to include aretz ("earth", H0776G), forming a fixed two-part expression covering the totality of created space.
Differences between versions
The Hebrew participle qoneh (H7069) can denote either "creator" or "possessor/owner." The LXX renders this with ὃς ἔκτισεν ("who created"), a finite relative clause rather than a participle, and the Vulgate similarly uses qui creavit ("who created"), also a finite verb. Both Greek and Latin versions thus resolve the participle toward the "creator" sense and restructure it as a relative clause rather than a construct-state noun phrase as in the Hebrew. The Spanish RV1909 reflects the alternative sense with "poseedor" ("possessor"), while BSB and SBLIBRE follow the "creator" reading.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.