Genesis 13:16

וְשַׂמְתִּי אֶֽת־זַרְעֲךָ כַּעֲפַר הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר׀ אִם־יוּכַל אִישׁ לִמְנוֹת אֶת־עֲפַר הָאָרֶץ גַּֽם־זַרְעֲךָ יִמָּנֶֽה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְשַׂמְתִּ֥י אֶֽת־זַרְעֲךָ֖ כַּעֲפַ֣ר הָאָ֑רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֣ר׀ אִם־יוּכַ֣ל אִ֗ישׁ לִמְנוֹת֙ אֶת־עֲפַ֣ר הָאָ֔רֶץ גַּֽם־זַרְעֲךָ֖ יִמָּנֶֽה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ποιήσω τὸ σπέρμα σου ὡς τὴν ἄμμον τῆς γῆς· εἰ δύναταί τις ἐξαριθμῆσαι τὴν ἄμμον τῆς γῆς, καὶ τὸ σπέρμα σου ἀριθμηθήσεται.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Faciamque semen tuum sicut pulverem terræ: si quis potest hominum numerare pulverem terræ, semen quoque tuum numerare poterit.

Spanish

Haré que tu descendencia sea como el polvo de la tierra; ¡si alguien puede contar el polvo de la tierra, también podrá contar a tus descendientes!

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y haré tu simiente como el polvo de la tierra: que si alguno podrá contar el polvo de la tierra, también tu simiente será contada.

English

I will make your offspring like the dust of the earth, so that if one could count the dust of the earth, then your offspring could be counted.

What the text says

Summary

The verse reports a statement in which the speaker promises to make the addressee's offspring as numerous as the dust of the earth, using a comparison of countability: just as no one could count the earth's dust grains, so the offspring could not be counted.

Key words

  • sam.Ti ("I will make", H7760A) — qal sequential perfect, first person; continues a preceding narrative sequence with the sense "and I will set/make."
  • zar.'a.kha ("your offspring", H2233H + H9021) — masculine singular noun in construct form with second-person suffix, appearing twice, framing both halves of the comparison.
  • 'a.Far ("dust of", H6083) — masculine singular construct noun, also repeated twice, anchoring the image of innumerability.
  • yu.Khal ("he will be able", H3201) — qal imperfect, sets up the hypothetical condition ("if anyone is able to...").
  • yi.ma.Neh ("it will be numbered", H4487) — niphal (passive) imperfect, matching the active infinitive m.nOt ("count", H4487) from the same root, producing a word-play between the ability to count and the offspring being counted.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence opens with the narrative vav on sam.Ti, marking continuation from a prior clause, followed by the object marker 'et before zar.'a.kha ("your offspring"), the direct object of "I will make/set." The comparison particle ka ("like", H9004) introduces 'a.Far ha'Aretz ("the dust of the earth"), a construct chain with the definite article attached to "earth" rather than "dust," a common construct-state pattern in Hebrew.

The second half of the verse is built as a conditional clause introduced by 'a.Sher... 'im ("which... if"), a combination functioning as "if" or "in the case that." The condition itself uses yu.Khal ("he will be able," imperfect) governing the infinitive li-m.nOt ("to count"), with 'ish ("anyone," H0376I) as the hypothetical subject. This clause repeats 'et 'a.Far ha'Aretz ("the dust of the earth") verbatim from the first half, creating a structural mirroring.

The conclusion uses gam ("also," H1571) to introduce the second occurrence of zar.'a.kha ("your offspring") as the subject of yi.ma.Neh, a niphal (passive) imperfect from the same root as m.nOt. The shift from qal infinitive (active "to count") to niphal imperfect (passive "will be numbered") creates a grammatical echo linking the impossibility of counting the dust to the impossibility of numbering the offspring.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders 'a.Far ("dust", H6083) as ἄμμον ("sand") rather than a dust-equivalent, differing from the Hebrew image; the Vulgate follows the Hebrew more closely with pulverem ("dust"). The Vulgate also adds hominum ("of men") after quis ("anyone"), specifying the hypothetical counter as a human being, a detail not explicit in the Hebrew 'ish ("anyone/a man", H0376I) alone, though 'ish itself can carry that sense.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.