Genesis 12:8
וַיַּעְתֵּק מִשָּׁם הָהָרָה מִקֶּדֶם לְבֵֽית־אֵל וַיֵּט אָהְָלוֹ בֵּֽית־אֵל מִיָּם וְהָעַי מִקֶּדֶם וַיִּֽבֶן־שָׁם מִזְבֵּחַ לַֽיהוָה וַיִּקְרָא בְּשֵׁם יְהוָֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיַּעְתֵּ֨ק מִשָּׁ֜ם הָהָ֗רָה מִקֶּ֛דֶם לְבֵֽית־אֵ֖ל וַיֵּ֣ט אָהְָל֑וֹ בֵּֽית־אֵ֤ל מִיָּם֙ וְהָעַ֣י מִקֶּ֔דֶם וַיִּֽבֶן־שָׁ֤ם מִזְבֵּ֙חַ֙ לַֽיהוָ֔ה וַיִּקְרָ֖א בְּשֵׁ֥ם יְהוָֽה׃
καὶ ἀπέστη ἐκεῖθεν εἰς τὸ ὄρος κατ’ ἀνατολὰς Βαιθήλ, ἔστησεν ἐκεῖ τὴν σκηνὴν αὐτοῦ ἐν Βαιθὴλ κατὰ θάλασσαν καὶ κατ’ ἀνατολάς· καὶ ᾠκοδόμησεν ἐκεῖ θυσιαστήριον τῷ κυρίῳ καὶ ἐπεκαλέσατο ἐπὶ τῷ ὀνόματι κυρίου.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Et inde transgrediens ad montem, qui erat contra orientem Bethel, tetendit ibi tabernaculum suum, ab occidente habens Bethel, et ab oriente Hai: ædificavit quoque ibi altare Domino, et invocavit nomen ejus.
De allí pasó a la región montañosa que está al oriente de Betel, donde plantó su tienda, entre Betel al occidente y Ay al oriente. También allí construyó un altar a Yehová e invocó su nombre.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y pasóse de allí á un monte al oriente de Bethel, y tendió su tienda, teniendo á Bethel al occidente y Hai al oriente: y edificó allí altar á Jehová, é invocó el nombre de Jehová.
From there Abram moved on to the hill country east of Bethel and pitched his tent, with Bethel to the west and Ai to the east. There he built an altar to the LORD, and he called on the name of the LORD.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse narrates Abram's movement from his previous location to the hill country east of Beth-el, where he pitches his tent between Beth-el and Ai, builds an altar to Yehovah, and calls on Yehovah's name. The text uses a chain of narrative verb forms to present these as sequential actions.
Key words
- va-yaʿteq ("he moved on", H6275) — hiphil (causative) narrative form; the causative stem suggests Abram actively relocates himself/his camp, not merely "goes."
- ha-Hara ("the hill country", H2022) with directional -h (H9011) — the article plus directional suffix indicates motion "toward the hill country" rather than static location.
- mi-Qedem ("from the east", H6924) — appears twice (lines 9 and 25), used as a directional/positional marker relative to Beth-el and later to Ai, meaning "on the east side."
- ohŏl-o ("his tent", H0168 construct + H9023 suffix) — construct form with pronominal suffix, "tent of-him," a fixed idiom for pitching one's dwelling.
- va-yiqra' be-shem YHWH ("he called on the name of Yehovah", H7121 + H8034 construct) — shem is in construct ("name of"), and the verb takes the preposition be ("on/in"), a set expression distinct from simply "naming" something.
What the text says
The verse is built entirely on the narrative vav (va-, H9001) chain: va-yaʿteq ("and he moved on"), va-yet ("and he pitched", H5186), va-yiven ("and he built", H1129), va-yiqra' ("and he called", H7121). Each verb is qal except the first, which is hiphil, marking a shift in verbal intensity for the act of relocating. This chain structure presents four consecutive, sequential actions without subordinate clauses, typical of Biblical Hebrew narrative prose.
The spatial description embedded in the middle of the verse — Beth-el mi-yam ("from the west/sea", H3220) and Ai mi-Qedem ("from the east", H6924) — is a nominal, non-verbal clause inserted into the narrative chain, describing the tent's position relative to two fixed points rather than continuing the action sequence. The double use of Qedem ("east") — once for the hill country's location relative to Beth-el, once for Ai's location relative to the tent — links two different geographic relationships with the same directional term.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders mi-yam ("from the west", H3220, literally "from the sea") as κατὰ θάλασσαν ("toward the sea"), preserving the "sea" imagery that in Hebrew idiom conventionally denotes "west" (the Mediterranean lying west of the land). The Vulgate uses ab occidente ("from the west"), interpreting the directional sense rather than the literal "sea" wording. All three traditions agree on the sequence of events and place names.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.