Genesis 12:1
וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל־אַבְרָם לֶךְ־לְךָ מֵאַרְצְךָ וּמִמּֽוֹלַדְתְּךָ וּמִבֵּית אָבִיךָ אֶל־הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר אַרְאֶֽךָּ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיֹּ֤אמֶר יְהוָה֙ אֶל־אַבְרָ֔ם לֶךְ־לְךָ֛ מֵאַרְצְךָ֥ וּמִמּֽוֹלַדְתְּךָ֖ וּמִבֵּ֣ית אָבִ֑יךָ אֶל־הָאָ֖רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֥ר אַרְאֶֽךָּ׃
Καὶ εἶπεν κύριος τῷ Ἁβρἀμ Ἔξελθε ἐκ τῆς γῆς σου καὶ συγγενείας σου καὶ ἐκ τοῦ οἴκου τοῦ πατρός σου, εἰς τὴν γῆν ἢν ἄν δείξω.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Dixit autem Dominus ad Abram: Egredere de terra tua, et de cognatione tua, et de domo patris tui, et veni in terram quam monstrabo tibi.
Yehová le dijo a Abram: “Vete de tu tierra, de tu parentela y de la casa de tu padre a la tierra que yo te mostraré.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
EMPERO Jehová había dicho á Abram: Vete de tu tierra y de tu parentela, y de la casa de tu padre, á la tierra que te mostraré;
Then the LORD said to Abram, “Leave your country, your kindred, and your father’s household, and go to the land I will show you.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse opens the divine call narrative: Yehovah speaks to Abram, commanding him to leave his land, his kindred, and his father's household, and to go toward a land that Yehovah will show him. The sentence is built as a single command followed by a three-part list of what is being left behind, and a purpose clause naming the destination.
Key words
- va-yo'mer ("and he said", H0559) — qal narrative form; the vav consecutive links this speech act as the next event in the story sequence, not a general or past-perfect statement.
- lekh-lekha ("go", H1980G + H9031) — qal imperative "go" followed by the preposition "for" plus the pronominal suffix "you," literally "go for yourself." The suffix marks the second-person addressee explicitly, adding a reflexive/personal-involvement nuance to the bare imperative.
- mo.ladtekha ("your kindred", H4138) — feminine singular noun in construct, the second of three items (land, kindred, father's house) that the addressee is told to leave.
- beit 'avikha ("household of your father", H1004M + H0001G) — construct chain, "house of your father," the third and most specific circle of origin named.
- ar'ekha ("I will show you", H7200G) — hiphil (causative) imperfect, first person: "I will cause [you] to see." The imperfect aspect marks an action not yet completed, pointing to the future revealing of the land's identity, which remains unnamed here.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence structure moves from a general command (lekh-lekha, "go") to three narrowing points of origin — me'artzekha ("from your land", H0776G), u-mimmoladtekha ("and from your kindred", H4138), and u-mibbeit 'avikha ("and from the house of your father", H1004M + H0001G) — each introduced by the preposition min ("from"), each in construct form binding it to the pronominal suffix "your." This produces a rhetorical narrowing: land, then clan, then immediate paternal household, each smaller in scope than the last.
The destination clause, 'el-ha'aretz 'asher ar'ekha ("to the land which I will show you"), withholds the name of the land entirely; the relative clause 'asher ("which", H0834A) plus the hiphil imperfect verb keeps the location undisclosed, dependent on a future disclosure act by the subject Yehovah. The imperative lekh-lekha itself carries a suffixed pronoun not required by ordinary Hebrew imperative syntax, a feature the word list marks as producing the sense "go for yourself" rather than a plain "go."
Differences between versions
The LXX renders lekh-lekha as Ἔξελθε ("go out"), a single imperative verb without any equivalent to the "for yourself" suffix present in the Hebrew. The Vulgate similarly uses Egredere ("go out/depart"), also omitting a reflexive marker. Both the LXX and Vulgate express the destination clause with a future/subjunctive sense ("δείξω", "monstrabo" — "I will show"), matching the Hebrew hiphil imperfect ar'ekha. The RV1909 translation renders the opening verb as "había dicho" (pluperfect, "had said"), differing in tense from the BSB ("said") and SBLIBRE ("dijo"), which follow the narrative vav construction more directly as a simple past.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.