Exodus 9:25
וַיַּךְ הַבָּרָד בְּכָל־אֶרֶץ מִצְרַיִם אֵת כָּל־אֲשֶׁר בַּשָּׂדֶה מֵאָדָם וְעַד־בְּהֵמָה וְאֵת כָּל־עֵשֶׂב הַשָּׂדֶה הִכָּה הַבָּרָד וְאֶת־כָּל־עֵץ הַשָּׂדֶה שִׁבֵּֽר׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיַּ֨ךְ הַבָּרָ֜ד בְּכָל־אֶ֣רֶץ מִצְרַ֗יִם אֵ֚ת כָּל־אֲשֶׁ֣ר בַּשָּׂדֶ֔ה מֵאָדָ֖ם וְעַד־בְּהֵמָ֑ה וְאֵ֨ת כָּל־עֵ֤שֶׂב הַשָּׂדֶה֙ הִכָּ֣ה הַבָּרָ֔ד וְאֶת־כָּל־עֵ֥ץ הַשָּׂדֶ֖ה שִׁבֵּֽר׃
ἐπάταξεν δὲ ἡ χάλαζα ἐν πάση γῇ Αἰγύπτου ἀπὸ ἀνθρώπου ἕως κτήνους, καὶ πᾶσαν βοτάνην τὴν ἐν τῷ πεδίῳ ἐπάταξεν ἡ χάλαζα, καὶ πάντα τὰ ξύλα τὰ ἐν τοῖς πεδίοις συνέτριψεν ἡ χάλαζα·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Et percussit grando in omni terra Ægypti cuncta quæ fuerunt in agris, ab homine usque ad jumentum: cunctamque herbam agri percussit grando, et omne lignum regionis confregit.
En todo Egipto, el granizo destruyó todo lo que estaba a la intemperie, tanto personas como animales. El granizo también hizo pedazos todas las plantas y destrozó todos los árboles del campo.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y aquel granizo hirió en toda la tierra de Egipto todo lo que estaba en el campo, así hombres como bestias; asimismo hirió el granizo toda la hierba del campo, y desgajó todos los árboles del país.
Throughout the land of Egypt, the hail struck down everything in the field, both man and beast; it beat down every plant of the field and stripped every tree.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes the hail striking everything in the open fields throughout the land of Egypt — humans, livestock, vegetation, and trees — using three different verbs to describe the destructive action against different categories of objects.
Key words
- va-yakh ("and it struck", H5221) — hiphil narrative form, marking the main sequential action opening the verse; causative sense, "caused to strike."
- ha-barad ("the hail", H1259) — definite noun, the subject performing all three strikes described in the verse.
- hikkah ("it struck", H5221) — same root as yakh, now in perfect form, repeated to introduce the second object (vegetation) after the intervening clause.
- shibber ("it shattered", H7665) — piel (intensive) perfect, a different, more forceful verb than yakh/hikkah, used specifically for the trees.
- kol ("all/every", H3605) — construct noun repeated four times, structuring the verse into distinct categories of what was struck.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence is built in three movements, each governed by a form of the same core action but distributed across two verb roots. The first movement uses va-yakh ("and it struck", H5221) with ha-barad ("the hail", H1259) as subject, covering "all that was in the field" (kol-'asher ba-sadeh, H3605/H0834A/H7704G), specified further as ranging me-'adam ve-'ad-behemah ("from humankind and unto livestock", H0120G/H0929) — a construction using "from...unto" to indicate an inclusive range from one extreme to the other.
The second movement repeats the same verb root as hikkah ("it struck", H5221), now in perfect aspect rather than narrative vav-form, applied to kol-'esev ha-sadeh ("all the vegetation of the field", H6212/H7704G). This repetition of the nkh root (as yakh and hikkah) creates a structural echo, restating the hail's action before moving to the final and most severe consequence.
The third movement shifts to a different verb, shibber ("it shattered", H7665), in the piel (intensive) stem, applied to kol-'etz ha-sadeh ("every tree of the field", H6086H/H7704G). The piel form intensifies the action beyond simple striking — it denotes breaking or smashing, distinguishing the fate of the trees from that of the vegetation and living beings, which were merely "struck."
Differences between versions
The LXX uses a single verb, ἐπάταξεν ("struck"), for both the hail's action on humans/livestock and on vegetation, then switches to συνέτριψεν ("shattered together") for the trees — paralleling the Hebrew's shift from nkh to shbr. The Vulgate similarly uses percussit ("struck") twice and confregit ("broke completely") once, preserving the same two-verb distinction found in the Hebrew.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.