Exodus 5:7
לֹא תֹאסִפוּן לָתֵת תֶּבֶן לָעָם לִלְבֹּן הַלְּבֵנִים כִּתְמוֹל שִׁלְשֹׁם הֵם יֵֽלְכוּ וְקֹשְׁשׁוּ לָהֶם תֶּֽבֶן׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
לֹ֣א תֹאסִפ֞וּן לָתֵ֨ת תֶּ֧בֶן לָעָ֛ם לִלְבֹּ֥ן הַלְּבֵנִ֖ים כִּתְמ֣וֹל שִׁלְשֹׁ֑ם הֵ֚ם יֵֽלְכ֔וּ וְקֹשְׁשׁ֥וּ לָהֶ֖ם תֶּֽבֶן׃
Οὐκέτι προστεθήσεται διδόναι ἄχυρον τῷ λῆ εἰς τὴν πλινθουργίαν καθάπερ ἐχθὲς καὶ τρίτην ἡμέραν· αὐτοὶ πορευέσθωσαν καὶ συναγαγέτωσαν ἑαυτοῖς ἄχυρα.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Nequaquam ultra dabitis paleas populo ad conficiendos lateres, sicut prius: sed ipsi vadant, et colligant stipulas.
“Ya no le darán al pueblo paja para hacer ladrillos, como hacían antes. ¡Que vayan ellos mismos a juntar la paja!
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
De aquí adelante no daréis paja al pueblo para hacer ladrillo, como ayer y antes de ayer; vayan ellos y recojan por sí mismos la paja:
“ You shall no longer supply the people with straw for making bricks. They must go and gather their own straw.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Exodus 5:7 records Pharaoh's command halting the supply of straw to the Israelite slaves. The people are now required to go out themselves and collect the straw needed to make bricks, a task previously supported by the state.
Key words
- to.si.Fu ("you will repeat/continue", H3254) — Hiphil (causative) imperfect, 2nd person masculine plural, with a paragogic nun (H9013) attached for emphasis. The causative stem turns "add" into "cause to continue," and combined with lo' ("not", H3808) it forms the prohibition "you shall no longer continue."
- lin.Bon ("to make bricks", H3835B) — Qal infinitive, expressing purpose: the straw is given for the purpose of brick-making.
- hem ("they", H1992) — independent personal pronoun placed before the verb yelkhu, creating emphasis on the subject: it is precisely they (the people), not the officials, who must go.
- ko.she.Shu ("they may gather", H7197A) — Piel (intensive) form with prefixed vav, continuing the imperfect sequence begun with yelkhu; the intensive stem suggests effortful or repeated gathering activity, not a single simple act.
- la.Hem ("for themselves", H9038) — preposition + 3rd person masculine plural suffix, reinforcing that the gathering benefits no one but the workers themselves.
What the text says
The verse opens with a negated causative verb, lo' to.si.Fun, built on the root meaning "to add" (H3254G) in the Hiphil stem. This produces the sense "you shall not continue to do X," where X is expressed through the following infinitive la.Tet ("to give", H5414G). The infinitive construction la.Tet Te.ven la.'Am ("to give straw to the people") specifies the object of the discontinued action: providing straw. The next infinitive, lin.Bon ha.leve.Nim ("to make the bricks"), expresses the purpose for which the straw was formerly supplied, linked by the preposition li (H9005).
The comparative phrase ki.t.Mol shil.Shom ("as yesterday, the day before", H8543, H8032) sets up a contrast between prior practice and the new order. The second half of the verse pivots with the emphatic pronoun hem ("they") preceding the imperfect verb ye.le.Khu ("let them go", H1980G), stressing that the burden shifts to the workers themselves. The following clause ve.ko.she.Shu la.Hem Te.ven uses a Piel form of qashash (H7197A), an intensive stem that can imply sustained or effortful collecting, followed by la.Hem ("for themselves") — doubly marking that the people must now supply their own material with their own labor.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders to.si.Fu with Οὐκέτι προστεθήσεται ("it shall no longer be added"), using a passive construction rather than the active Hebrew causative addressed to "you" (plural). The Vulgate's dabitis ("you shall give") keeps the active second-person form closer to the Hebrew structure. The Hebrew phrase ki.t.Mol shil.Shom ("as yesterday, the day before yesterday") is rendered in the LXX literally as καθάπερ ἐχθὲς καὶ τρίτην ἡμέραν, while the Vulgate simplifies this idiom to sicut prius ("as before"), losing the specific temporal idiom.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.