Exodus 38:27

וַיְהִי מְאַת כִּכַּר הַכֶּסֶף לָצֶקֶת אֵת אַדְנֵי הַקֹּדֶשׁ וְאֵת אַדְנֵי הַפָּרֹכֶת מְאַת אֲדָנִים לִמְאַת הַכִּכָּר כִּכָּר לָאָֽדֶן׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיְהִ֗י מְאַת֙ כִּכַּ֣ר הַכֶּ֔סֶף לָצֶ֗קֶת אֵ֚ת אַדְנֵ֣י הַקֹּ֔דֶשׁ וְאֵ֖ת אַדְנֵ֣י הַפָּרֹ֑כֶת מְאַ֧ת אֲדָנִ֛ים לִמְאַ֥ת הַכִּכָּ֖ר כִּכָּ֥ר לָאָֽדֶן׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ἐποίησεν τὸν λουτῆρα, ἵνα νίπτωνται ἐξ αὐτοῦ Μωσῆς καὶ Ἀαρὼν καὶ οἱ υἱοὶ αὐτοῦ τὰς χεῖρας αὐτῶν καὶ τοὺς πόδας, εἰσπορευομένων αὐτῶν εἰς τὴν σκηνὴν τοῦ μορτυρίου· ἢ ὅταν προσπορεύωνται πρὸς τὸ θυσιαστήριον λειτουργεῖν, ἐνίπτοντο ἐξ αὐτοῦ, καθάπερ συνέταξεν Κύριος τῷ Μωυσῇ.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Centum bases factæ sunt de talentis centum, singulis talentis per bases singulas supputatis.

Spanish

De esa plata, se usaron unos tres mil cuatrocientos kilos para fundir las cien bases del santuario y del velo, de manera que cada base pesaba treinta y cuatro kilos.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Hubo además cien talentos de plata para hacer de fundición las basas del santuario y las basas del velo: en cien basas cien talentos, á talento por basa.

English

The hundred talents of silver were used to cast the bases of the sanctuary and the bases of the veil —100 bases from the 100 talents, one talent per base.

What the text says

Summary

The verse records that one hundred talents of silver were used to cast the bases (sockets) for the sanctuary structure and for the curtain, specifying a ratio of one talent of silver per base. It closes the account of silver used in the Tabernacle construction with a precise distributive calculation.

Key words

  • me'at ("[the] one hundred", H3967) — feminine singular construct number, chaining to kikar to form "hundred of talent," i.e., "a hundred talents."
  • kikar ("talent[s] of", H3603) — construct form, the unit of weight; repeated later in absolute form to mark the distributive ratio.
  • latzeqet ("to cast", H3332) — qal infinitive construct with prefixed la, expressing purpose: "in order to cast."
  • 'admei / 'adanim ("bases of / bases", H0134) — appears four times in different grammatical states (construct plural, absolute plural, absolute singular), tracking the objects being counted and then distributed.
  • parokhet ("curtain", H6532) — feminine singular absolute, naming the second location receiving cast bases.

What the text says

The verse opens with the narrative formula va-yehi ("and it was", H1961/H9001), introducing a quantity: me'at kikar ha-kesef, "the hundred talent(s) of the silver" — a construct chain where me'at governs kikar, which in turn governs ha-kesef. This quantity becomes the subject of the infinitive latzeqet ("to cast"), governing two objects marked by the untranslated direct-object particle 'et (H0853): 'admei ha-qodesh ("bases of the holy place") and 'admei ha-parokhet ("bases of the curtain").

The second half of the verse restates the same material using a distributive construction: me'at 'adanim limə'at ha-kikar, kikar la-'aden — literally "a hundred bases for the hundred talent(s), a talent for the base." Here the preposition la (H9005) attached to both me'at and 'aden signals distribution ("for each," "per"), producing the ratio of one talent per base without any arithmetic operator — the grammar itself carries the calculation.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew, Vulgate ("Centum bases factae sunt de talentis centum, singulis talentis per bases singulas supputatis"), and English translations align closely on content: a hundred bases from a hundred talents, one talent each. The Septuagint text supplied for this reference (Exodus 38:27 LXX numbering) instead describes the bronze laver and its use by Moses, Aaron, and his sons for washing hands and feet before entering the tent of meeting — content that does not correspond to the silver-bases material found in the Hebrew verse. This reflects a difference in verse alignment/content between the Greek and Hebrew textual traditions at this point in Exodus 38, rather than a translation choice within the same verse.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.