Exodus 38:15

וְלַכָּתֵף הַשֵּׁנִית מִזֶּה וּמִזֶּה לְשַׁעַר הֶֽחָצֵר קְלָעִים חֲמֵשׁ עֶשְׂרֵה אַמָּה עַמֻּדֵיהֶם שְׁלֹשָׁה וְאַדְנֵיהֶם שְׁלֹשָֽׁה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְלַכָּתֵ֣ף הַשֵּׁנִ֗ית מִזֶּ֤ה וּמִזֶּה֙ לְשַׁ֣עַר הֶֽחָצֵ֔ר קְלָעִ֕ים חֲמֵ֥שׁ עֶשְׂרֵ֖ה אַמָּ֑ה עַמֻּדֵיהֶ֣ם שְׁלֹשָׁ֔ה וְאַדְנֵיהֶ֖ם שְׁלֹשָֽׁה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ἐκ τῶν καλαμίσκων αὐτῆς οἱ βλαστοὶ ἐξέχοντες, τρεῖς ἐκ τούτου καὶ τρεὶς ἐκ τούτου, ἐξισούμενοι ἀλλήλοις·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

et in parte altera (quia inter utraque introitum tabernaculi fecit) quindecim æque cubitorum erant tentoria, columnæque tres, et bases totidem.

Spanish

Al otro lado también había cortinas a lo largo de casi siete metros, colgadas de tres postes sobre tres bases.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Al otro lado, de la una parte y de la otra de la puerta del atrio, cortinas de á quince codos, sus tres columnas, y sus tres basas.

English

And the curtains on the other side were also fifteen cubits long, with three posts and three bases as well.

What the text says

Summary

The verse describes the second side of the entrance to the courtyard (chatzer, H2691A), specifying that hanging curtains (qela'im, H7050B) of fifteen cubits stood "on this side and that side" of the gate, supported by three pillars and three bases, mirroring the structure described for the first side in the preceding verse.

Key words

  • ka.Tef ("side", H3802) — feminine singular noun with the definite article and the ordinal she.Nit ("second", H8145), marking this as the counterpart to a first side already described.
  • Zeh ("this", H2088) — demonstrative particle repeated in the pair mi.Zeh...u.mi.Zeh ("from this...and from this"), an idiomatic construction meaning "on one side and on the other."
  • sha.'ar ("gate of", H8179G) — construct form linking directly to he.cha.Tzer ("the courtyard", H2691A), forming the phrase "gate of the courtyard."
  • 'a.mu.dei ("pillars of", H5982G) — construct plural noun followed by the suffix Hem ("their", H9028), yielding "their pillars," referring back to the curtains just mentioned.
  • cha.Mesh 'es.Reh ("fifteen", H2568 + H6240) — a construct numeral pair, literally "five-teen," modifying 'a.Mah ("cubit", H0520A).

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence opens with a prepositional phrase, ve.la.ka.Tef ha.she.Nit ("and for the second side"), establishing that this verse continues a description begun elsewhere for the first side of the gate structure. The phrase mi.Zeh u.mi.Zeh ("from this and from this") is a fixed idiom indicating two flanking positions relative to le.sha.'ar he.cha.Tzer ("to the gate of the courtyard"), a construct chain tying the curtains' placement directly to the entrance structure.

The numerical measurement cha.Mesh 'es.Reh 'a.Mah ("fifteen cubit[s]") follows the noun qela'im ("curtains", H7050B) without an intervening verb, a common feature of Hebrew measurement clauses where the number stands appositionally to specify length. The two closing clauses — 'a.mu.dei Hem she.lo.Shah ("their pillars, three") and ve.'ad.nei Hem she.lo.Shah ("and their bases, three") — use the construct-plus-suffix pattern (noun-construct + Hem) to indicate possession, meaning "the pillars belonging to them" and "the bases belonging to them," referring back to the curtains and their supporting structure.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew text describes the courtyard gate's second side, its curtains, pillars, and bases. The LXX (Swete) text provided for this reference instead describes lampstand branches (kalamiskoi) with three shoots extending symmetrically — content unrelated to the courtyard gate, reflecting the LXX's differing arrangement of tabernacle material in Exodus. The Vulgate inserts an explanatory clause, "quia inter utraque introitum tabernaculi fecit" ("because between the two he made the entrance of the tabernacle"), which is not present as a separate clause in the Hebrew but reflects the same underlying spatial arrangement implied by mi.Zeh u.mi.Zeh.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.