Exodus 32:4
וַיִּקַּח מִיָּדָם וַיָּצַר אֹתוֹ בַּחֶרֶט וַֽיַּעֲשֵׂהוּ עֵגֶל מַסֵּכָה וַיֹּאמְרוּ אֵלֶּה אֱלֹהֶיךָ יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר הֶעֱלוּךָ מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָֽיִם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיִּקַּ֣ח מִיָּדָ֗ם וַיָּ֤צַר אֹתוֹ֙ בַּחֶ֔רֶט וַֽיַּעֲשֵׂ֖הוּ עֵ֣גֶל מַסֵּכָ֑ה וַיֹּ֣אמְר֔וּ אֵ֤לֶּה אֱלֹהֶ֙יךָ֙ יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל אֲשֶׁ֥ר הֶעֱל֖וּךָ מֵאֶ֥רֶץ מִצְרָֽיִם׃
καὶ ἐδέξατο ἐκ τῶν χειρῶν αὐτῶν καὶ ἔπλασεν αὐτὰ ἐν τῇ γραφίδι, καὶ ἐποίησεν αὐτὰ μόσχον χωνευτὸν καὶ εἶπεν οὗτοι οἱ θεοί σου, Ἰσραήλ, οἵτινες ἀνεβίβασάν σε ἐκ γῆς Αἰγύπτου.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Quas cum ille accepisset, formavit opere fusorio, et fecit ex eis vitulum conflatilem: dixeruntque: Hi sunt dii tui Israël, qui te eduxerunt de terra Ægypti.
Él recibió el oro, lo trabajó con un cincel y fundió un becerro de metal. Al verlo, el pueblo gritó: “¡Israel, estos son tus dioses que te sacaron de Egipto!”.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
El cual los tomó de las manos de ellos, y formólo con buril, é hizo de ello un becerro de fundición. Entonces dijeron: Israel, estos son tus dioses, que te sacaron de la tierra de Egipto.
He took the gold from their hands, and with an engraving tool he fashioned it into a molten calf. And they said, “ These, O Israel, are your gods, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt!”
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse narrates Aaron receiving gold from the people, shaping it with a tool, and casting it into the form of a calf. The people then declare this object to be the "gods" that brought them out of Egypt.
Key words
- yiqqach ("he took", H3947H) — qal narrative verb, continuing the story sequence with "and then he took."
- yatsar ("he fashioned", H6696C) — qal narrative verb describing the shaping action; the root relates to forming or molding.
- chereth ("tool/engraving instrument", H2747) — masculine singular noun, object of the preposition ba ("with the"), naming the implement used.
- egel ("calf of", H5695) — masculine singular noun in construct state, meaning it is grammatically bound to the following word massekhah.
- massekhah ("molten metal/casting", H4541A) — feminine singular noun, completing the construct phrase "calf of molten-metal," i.e., a calf made by casting.
- eloheikha ("your gods", H0430J) — masculine plural noun in construct form with the suffix kha ("your"), used in the people's declaration.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence chain uses five consecutive narrative verbs joined by the va- prefix (H9001): yiqqach ("he took"), yatsar ("he fashioned"), ya'aseihu ("he made it"), and yo'meru ("they said"). This chain structure presents the actions as a rapid, sequential narrative: taking, shaping, making, and speaking follow one another without interruption.
The phrase egel massekhah (H5695 + H4541A) is a construct pair, literally "calf of casting/molten-metal," indicating the calf's material composition rather than describing it with a separate adjective. The object markers oto (H0853 + H9033, "it," referring to the gold) and hu (H9033, "it," referring to the calf) track the referent across the verbs of shaping and making.
In the people's declaration, eleh ("these", H0428) is a demonstrative particle pointing to the object just made, followed by the construct phrase eloheikha Yisrael ("gods of you, Israel"), where eloheikha (H0430J) is plural in form with a second-person singular suffix. The relative clause introduced by asher ("who/that", H0834A) modifies this phrase, using the hiphil perfect he'elukha ("they brought you up", H5927H) — a causative form indicating an action already completed, describing what these "gods" reportedly did.
Differences between versions
The Hebrew text does not explicitly name "gold" as the object taken; it only says mi-yadam ("from their hand", H3027I + H9028). The LXX and Vulgate likewise omit an explicit noun for gold at this point, matching the Hebrew's implicit reference. However, some translations (BSB, SBLIBRE) insert "gold" explicitly, clarifying the referent from context (established earlier in the chapter) though it is not a word present in this specific verse's Hebrew or Greek/Latin text.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.