Exodus 3:11

וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה אֶל־הָאֱלֹהִים מִי אָנֹכִי כִּי אֵלֵךְ אֶל־פַּרְעֹה וְכִי אוֹצִיא אֶת־בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל מִמִּצְרָֽיִם׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיֹּ֤אמֶר מֹשֶׁה֙ אֶל־הָ֣אֱלֹהִ֔ים מִ֣י אָנֹ֔כִי כִּ֥י אֵלֵ֖ךְ אֶל־פַּרְעֹ֑ה וְכִ֥י אוֹצִ֛יא אֶת־בְּנֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל מִמִּצְרָֽיִם׃

Greek (Septuagint)

Καὶ εἶπεν Μωυσῆς πρὸς τὸν θεόν τίς εἰμι ἐγὼ ὅτι πορεύσομαι πρὸς Φαραὼ βασιλέα Αἰγύπτου, καὶ ὅτι ἐξάξω τοὺς υἱοὺς Ἰσραὴλ ἐκ τῆς γῆς Αἰγύπτου;

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Dixitque Moyses ad Deum: Quis sum ego ut vadam ad Pharaonem, et educam filios Israël de Ægypto?

Spanish

Pero Moisés le dijo a Dios: “¿Y quién soy yo para presentarme ante el faraón y sacar de Egipto a los hijos de Israel?”

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Entonces Moisés respondió á Dios: ¿ Quién soy yo, para que vaya á Faraón, y saque de Egipto á los hijos de Israel?

English

But Moses asked God, “ Who am I, that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt?”

What the text says

Summary

Moses responds to God with a question about his own qualification: he asks "who am I" that he should go to Pharaoh and bring the people of Israel out of Egypt. The verse presents a rhetorical objection framed through two parallel purpose clauses.

Key words

  • mi ("who?", H4310) — interrogative pronoun opening the rhetorical question; paired with 'anokhi, it questions identity/worthiness rather than mere fact.
  • 'anokhi ("I", H0595) — independent personal pronoun; its use alongside a finite verb form (implied "to be") emphasizes the subject, giving weight to "who am I" as opposed to a plain statement.
  • ki ("that/if", H3588A) — subordinating particle appearing twice (lines 9 and 14), introducing two parallel clauses that specify what Moses feels unqualified for: going to Pharaoh, and bringing out the people.
  • 'elekh ("I will go", H1980G) — qal imperfect, first person; imperfect aspect marks this as a future/contemplated action tied to the ki clause.
  • 'otsi ("I will bring out", H3318H) — hiphil (causative) imperfect, first person; the causative stem indicates Moses himself would be the causal agent of the Israelites' exit, intensifying the scope of the task he questions.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence divides into two parts: the question itself, mi 'anokhi ("who am I"), and two subordinate clauses introduced by ki ("that" or "if") that explain what the question concerns. The first ki-clause uses 'elekh ("I will go"), a qal imperfect describing simple future motion toward Pharaoh. The second ki-clause uses 'otsi ("I will bring out"), a hiphil (causative) imperfect, marking a stronger, causative action: not just going, but actively causing the people of Israel, bene Yisra'el ("the people of Israel", H1121G construct + H3478), to leave Egypt. The repetition of ki creates a parallel structure, listing two tasks (confronting Pharaoh; extracting the people) under a single rhetorical question about identity or capability.

The construct phrase bene Yisra'el ("sons/people of Israel") functions as the object of 'otsi, marked by the untranslated direct object particle 'et (H0853). The preposition mi- attached to Mitzrayim ("from Egypt") indicates the point of departure for this causative action.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders par'oh ("Pharaoh", H6547J) as "Φαραὼ βασιλέα Αἰγύπτου" ("Pharaoh, king of Egypt"), adding a title not present in the Hebrew text, which contains only the name par'oh. The Vulgate follows the Hebrew more closely, using "Pharaonem" without the added title.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.