Exodus 28:13

וְעָשִׂיתָ מִשְׁבְּצֹת זָהָֽב׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְעָשִׂ֥יתָ מִשְׁבְּצֹ֖ת זָהָֽב׃

Greek (Septuagint)

Καὶ ποιήσεις ἀσπιδίσκας ἐκ χρυσίου καθαροῦ

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Facies et uncinos ex auro,

Spanish

Harás los engastes de oro,

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Harás pues, engastes de oro,

English

Fashion gold filigree settings

What the text says

Summary

The verse instructs the maker to fashion mishbetzot ("settings", H4865) of zahav ("gold", H2091). It is a short technical clause continuing a construction sequence, specifying the material and type of metalwork to be produced.

Key words

  • ve'asita ("and you will make", H6213) — qal verb in the sequential perfect (weqatal) form; this construction continues a chain of previous instructions, marking the verse as one step in an ongoing list of construction directives rather than an isolated command.
  • mishbetzot ("filigree settings of", H4865) — feminine plural noun in the construct state, meaning it is grammatically bound to the following noun; construct state signals "settings of [something]," requiring the next word to complete its meaning.
  • zahav ("gold", H2091) — masculine singular noun, functioning as the genitive complement of the construct chain; it identifies the material of the settings without any additional qualifier (no adjective like "pure" or "fine" appears in the Hebrew).

What the text says

The Hebrew clause is minimal: a sequential verb followed by a two-word construct chain. The verb ve'asita uses the second-person masculine singular sequential perfect, a form typical of instructional or legal Hebrew that links this action to a preceding sequence of commands — the addressee is told to continue the work already underway. The construct phrase mishbetzot zahav is compact: mishbetzot is plural and in construct state, meaning it cannot stand alone grammatically; it depends on zahav to specify what the settings are made of. The Hebrew does not qualify the gold with any adjective — it is simply "gold," not "pure gold" or "fine gold."

Differences between versions

The Septuagint renders mishbetzot as aspidiskas ("little shields" or "bosses"), a different image from the "settings" or "filigree work" implied by the Hebrew construct noun. The LXX also adds the qualifier katharou ("pure"), giving "gold of pure [quality]," where the Hebrew text has only zahav ("gold") without any such modifier. The Vulgate uses uncinos ("hooks" or "clasps"), which diverges further from both the Hebrew and the Greek, suggesting a fastening device rather than a decorative setting. Modern translations such as the BSB and Spanish versions ("engastes de oro" / "filigree settings") follow the Hebrew construct sense of settings or mountings, closer to the source text's mishbetzot than either the LXX's "shields" or the Vulgate's "hooks."

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.