Exodus 21:25
כְּוִיָּה תַּחַת כְּוִיָּה פֶּצַע תַּחַת פָּצַע חַבּוּרָה תַּחַת חַבּוּרָֽה׃ ס
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
כְּוִיָּה֙ תַּ֣חַת כְּוִיָּ֔ה פֶּ֖צַע תַּ֣חַת פָּ֑צַע חַבּוּרָ֕ה תַּ֖חַת חַבּוּרָֽה׃ ס
κατάκαυμα ἀντὶ κατακαύματος, τραῦμα ἀντὶ τραύματος, μώλωπα ἀντὶ μώλωπος.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
adustionem pro adustione, vulnus pro vulnere, livorem pro livore.
quemadura por quemadura, herida por herida, golpe por golpe.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Quemadura por quemadura, herida por herida, golpe por golpe.
burn for burn, wound for wound, and stripe for stripe.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse presents three paired terms for physical injuries, each linked by the preposition tachat ("in place of", H8478H), establishing a pattern of equivalence between an inflicted injury and its corresponding penalty. The three pairs move from burning, to open wound, to bruise/welt.
Key words
- kevi-Yah ("burning", H3555) — feminine singular noun, appearing twice to form the first pair; denotes injury by fire or heat.
- Ta.chat ("in place of", H8478H) — masculine singular noun in construct form, functioning as a preposition meaning "instead of" or "corresponding to"; repeated three times to structure each pair.
- Pe.tza' ("bruise", H6482) — masculine singular noun, appearing twice for the second pair; denotes a wound with broken skin.
- cha.bu.Rah ("wound", H2250) — feminine singular noun, appearing twice for the third pair; denotes a welt or mark left by a blow.
What the text says
The Hebrew syntax consists of three short nominal phrases, each following the identical pattern: [noun] tachat [same noun]. There is no verb in the verse itself; it continues the legal formula begun in the preceding verses of the chapter, where such reciprocal injury clauses are listed. The construct form of tachat here does not govern a following noun in the usual construct-genitive sense but functions grammatically as a preposition meaning "in place of," linking two occurrences of the same term to express strict correspondence between the injury inflicted and the penalty prescribed.
The three terms — keviyah ("burning", H3555), petza' ("bruise", H6482), and chaburah ("wound", H2250) — represent three distinct categories of physical harm, ordered without an explicit connecting conjunction between the pairs, giving the verse a terse, list-like rhythm characteristic of legal enumeration. Each noun is repeated exactly, so the grammatical structure itself enacts the principle of equivalence: the second occurrence of each noun mirrors the first, separated only by tachat.
Differences between versions
The Septuagint renders the three Hebrew nouns with katakauma ("burn"), trauma ("wound"), and molops ("welt/bruise"), each followed by anti ("instead of"), closely mirroring the Hebrew's repetitive tachat-structure. The Vulgate similarly uses adustionem... pro adustione, vulnus... pro vulnere, livorem... pro livore, preserving the same threefold repetition. Both versions maintain the same three-part correspondence found in the Hebrew, differing mainly in the specific semantic range of terms chosen for petza' (H6482) and chaburah (H2250), which the Greek and Latin distribute somewhat differently between "wound" and "bruise/welt" categories compared to the Hebrew's own distinctions between an open wound and a welt from blunt trauma.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.