Exodus 2:7

וַתֹּאמֶר אֲחֹתוֹ אֶל־בַּת־פַּרְעֹה הַאֵלֵךְ וְקָרָאתִי לָךְ אִשָּׁה מֵינֶקֶת מִן הָעִבְרִיֹּת וְתֵינִק לָךְ אֶת־הַיָּֽלֶד׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַתֹּ֣אמֶר אֲחֹתוֹ֮ אֶל־בַּת־פַּרְעֹה֒ הַאֵלֵ֗ךְ וְקָרָ֤אתִי לָךְ֙ אִשָּׁ֣ה מֵינֶ֔קֶת מִ֖ן הָעִבְרִיֹּ֑ת וְתֵינִ֥ק לָ֖ךְ אֶת־הַיָּֽלֶד׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ εἶπεν ἡ ἀδελφὴ αὐτοῦ τῇ θυγατρὶ Φαραώ Θέλεις καλέσω σοι γυναῖκα τροφεύουσαν ἐκ τῶν Ἐβραίων, καὶ θηλάσει σοι τὸ παιδίον ;

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Cui soror pueri: Vis, inquit, ut vadam, et vocem tibi mulierem hebræam, quæ nutrire possit infantulum?

Spanish

Entonces la hermana del niño le dijo a la hija del faraón: “¿Quiere que vaya a llamar a una nodriza hebrea para que le amamante al niño?”

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Entonces su hermana dijo á la hija de Faraón: ¿ Iré á llamarte un ama de las Hebreas, para que te críe este niño?

English

Then his sister said to Pharaoh ’s daughter, “ Shall I go and call one of the Hebrew women to nurse the child for you?”

What the text says

Summary

The sister of the child addresses Pharaoh's daughter, proposing to fetch a nursing woman from among the Hebrew women so that she may nurse the child for her. The utterance is framed as a question introduced by the interrogative particle, followed by a proposal expressed in two further verbal forms.

Key words

  • 'achot ("sister", H0269) — feminine singular construct, "sister of him," referring back to the child; the suffix supplies "his" without a separate word for the child's name.
  • ha-'elekh (H9008 + H1980G) — the interrogative particle ha prefixed to the imperfect 'elekh ("will I go"), turning a plain future verb into a yes/no question: "Shall I go?"
  • qarati ("will I call", H7121G) — a sequential (vav-consecutive) perfect that continues the force of the preceding imperfect question, so the two verbs together form one continuous query: "shall I go and call."
  • meineqet ("suckling-nurse", H3243I) — a qal participial noun describing the woman by her function, "one who nurses."
  • teiniq ("she may suckle", H3243H) — from the same root as meineqet but in the hiphil (causative) stem with a vav, expressing purpose or result: "so that she may cause [the child] to nurse," i.e., "nurse him."

What the text says

The sentence opens with the narrative vav on va-tomer ("and she said", H0559), attaching this speech directly to the ongoing story. The core of the sister's question is built from two verbs sharing one interrogative: ha-'elekh ("shall I go") and ve-qarati ("and shall I call"), the second being a vav-consecutive perfect that rides on the interrogative force of the first verb rather than starting a new independent statement. This construction allows a single question mark in Hebrew to govern two actions ("go" and "call") as one proposed course of action.

The object of the calling is 'ishah meineqet min ha-'ivriyyot — literally "a woman, a nursing one, from the Hebrew [women]" — where meineqet functions appositionally, describing the 'ishah ("woman", H0802G) by her nursing role, and min ha-'ivriyyot specifies the group she is drawn from using the gentilic plural 'ivriyyot ("Hebrew [women]", H5680).

The final clause, ve-teiniq lakh et-ha-yaled, shifts to the hiphil form teiniq, expressing the causative sense "so she may nurse/cause to nurse," with lakh ("for you", H9032) indicating the benefit accrues to Pharaoh's daughter, and 'et-ha-yaled marking "the child" (H3206) as the definite direct object via the untranslated marker 'et (H0853).

Differences between versions

The Vulgate specifies "soror pueri" ("sister of the child"), spelling out the referent of the Hebrew pronominal suffix on 'achotO ("his sister"), where the Hebrew leaves the antecedent implicit through the suffix alone. The LXX renders the interrogative construction with Theleis ("do you want") plus a subjunctive kaleso ("shall I call"), restructuring the two Hebrew verbs ('elekh, "go," and qarati, "call") into a single request framed around the addressee's will, rather than preserving the "go and call" sequence of the Hebrew.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.