Exodus 18:10
וַיֹּאמֶר יִתְרוֹ בָּרוּךְ יְהוָה אֲשֶׁר הִצִּיל אֶתְכֶם מִיַּד מִצְרַיִם וּמִיַּד פַּרְעֹה אֲשֶׁר הִצִּיל אֶת־הָעָם מִתַּחַת יַד־מִצְרָֽיִם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיֹּאמֶר֮ יִתְרוֹ֒ בָּר֣וּךְ יְהוָ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֨ר הִצִּ֥יל אֶתְכֶ֛ם מִיַּ֥ד מִצְרַ֖יִם וּמִיַּ֣ד פַּרְעֹ֑ה אֲשֶׁ֤ר הִצִּיל֙ אֶת־הָעָ֔ם מִתַּ֖חַת יַד־מִצְרָֽיִם׃
καὶ εἶπεν Ιοθόρ Εὐλογητὸς Κύριος, ὅτι ἐξείλατο αὐτοὺς ἐκ χειρὸς Αἰγυπτίων καὶ ἐκ χειρὸς Φαραώ·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Et ait: Benedictus Dominus, qui liberavit vos de manu Ægyptiorum, et de manu Pharaonis; qui eruit populum suum de manu Ægypti.
Y exclamó Jetro: “¡Alabado sea Yehová, que los rescató a ustedes del poder de los egipcios y del faraón! ¡Él liberó al pueblo del control de Egipto!
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y Jethro dijo: Bendito sea Jehová, que os libró de mano de los Egipcios, y de la mano de Faraón, y que libró al pueblo de la mano de los Egipcios.
Jethro declared, “ Blessed be the LORD, who has delivered you from the hand of the Egyptians and of Pharaoh, and who has delivered the people from the hand of the Egyptians.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Jethro pronounces a blessing over Yehovah, praising him for delivering Moses and the Israelites from the power of Egypt and Pharaoh. The verse repeats the theme of deliverance twice, using two parallel relative clauses built on the same verb, shifting from addressing "you" (Moses and family) to speaking of "the people" as a whole.
Key words
- baruch ("[be] blessed", H1288) — qal passive participle, masculine singular; a fixed liturgical form used to open blessing formulas, here predicated of Yehovah.
- 'asher ("who", H0834A) — relative particle used twice, introducing two parallel clauses that both elaborate on Yehovah's action of deliverance.
- hitsil ("he has delivered", H5337) — hiphil (causative) perfect, repeated in both clauses; the hiphil stem marks Yehovah as the causal agent who "caused deliverance," and the perfect aspect frames the action as completed.
- yad ("hand of", H3027W) — construct noun appearing three times (verses 11, 15, 24), an idiom for power or control, always governed by a preposition (min, "from," or mi-tachat, "from under").
- ha-'am ("the people", H5971A + H9009) — definite noun marking a shift from the second-person plural suffix -khem ("you," H9036) in the first clause to a third-person collective reference in the second.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence opens with the narrative va-yomer ("and he said," H0559) introducing Jethro's direct speech. The blessing formula barukh Yehovah stands independently, followed by two relative clauses both governed by 'asher... hitsil ("who delivered"). The first clause uses the object suffix -khem ("you," second-person plural) and the double phrase mi-yad mitsrayim / u-mi-yad par'oh ("from the hand of Egypt" and "from the hand of Pharaoh"), naming Egypt and Pharaoh as separate agents of oppression. The second clause repeats the verb hitsil but changes the object to et-ha'am ("the people") and uses a different construction, mi-tachat yad-mitsrayim ("from under the hand of Egypt"), which intensifies the image of subjugation compared to the plain mi-yad used earlier. The repetition of the hiphil perfect hitsil across both clauses creates a parallel structure that reinforces the completeness of the deliverance while varying the addressee (from "you" to "the people").
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the passage as a single clause (hoti exeilato autous ek cheiros Aigyption kai ek cheiros Pharao), using the third-person plural pronoun autous ("them") where the Hebrew text has the second-person suffix -khem ("you") in the first clause; the LXX text as given does not present a separate second hoti clause corresponding to the Hebrew's second 'asher... hitsil clause about "the people." The Vulgate preserves the Hebrew's two-clause structure, rendering the first object as "vos" ("you," matching -khem) and the second as "populum suum" ("his people," matching ha'am), keeping the shift in address visible in Latin as it is in Hebrew.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.