Exodus 17:7
וַיִּקְרָא שֵׁם הַמָּקוֹם מַסָּה וּמְרִיבָה עַל־רִיב׀ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְעַל נַסֹּתָם אֶת־יְהוָה לֵאמֹר הֲיֵשׁ יְהוָה בְּקִרְבֵּנוּ אִם־אָֽיִן׃ פ
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיִּקְרָא֙ שֵׁ֣ם הַמָּק֔וֹם מַסָּ֖ה וּמְרִיבָ֑ה עַל־רִ֣יב׀ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל וְעַ֨ל נַסֹּתָ֤ם אֶת־יְהוָה֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר הֲיֵ֧שׁ יְהוָ֛ה בְּקִרְבֵּ֖נוּ אִם־אָֽיִן׃ פ
καὶ ἐπωνόμασεν τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ τόπου ἐκείνου Πειρασμός, καὶ Λοιδόρησις, διὰ τὴν λοιδορίαν τῶν υἱῶν Ἰσραὴλ καὶ διὰ τὸ πειράζειν κύριον λέγοντας Εἰ ἔστιν ἔστιν ἐν ἡμῖν ἢ οὔ ;
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
et vocavit nomen loci illius, Tentatio, propter jurgium filiorum Israël, et quia tentaverunt Dominum, dicentes: Estne Dominus in nobis, an non?
Y Moisés llamó a aquel lugar Masah, y también Meribá, por el pleito de los israelitas, y porque pusieron a prueba a Yehová al decir: “¿Está Yehová entre nosotros, o no?”
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y llamó el nombre de aquel lugar Massah y Meribah, por la rencilla de los hijos de Israel, y porque tentaron á Jehová, diciendo: ¿Está, pues, Jehová entre nosotros, ó no?
He named the place Massah and Meribah because the Israelites quarreled, and because they tested the LORD, saying, “ Is the LORD among us or not?” The Defeat of the Amalekites
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse narrates how the place received two names, Massah ("testing", H4532) and Meribah ("quarrel", H4809), explaining this naming by two causes: the quarrel of the people of Israel and their testing of Yehovah. The verse closes by quoting the people's question, "Is Yehovah in our midst, or not?"
Key words
- va-yikra ("and he called", H7121) — qal narrative form; the vav-consecutive marks this as the next event in the story sequence, following what happened at Massah/Meribah.
- riv ("quarrel of", H7379) — masculine singular construct; grammatically linked to bene Yisra'el ("sons of Israel", H1121), forming "the quarrel of the sons of Israel."
- nassotam ("their testing", H5254) — piel infinitive with 3mp suffix; the piel stem intensifies the verbal idea (testing/trying), and the suffix "-am" ("they/their") identifies Israel as the one who tests, with et-Yehovah (H0853 + H3068) marking Yehovah as the direct object of that testing.
- yesh ("is there", H3426) — an existential particle asserting presence; combined with the interrogative ha (H9008) it forms the question "is there...?"
- ayin ("not/there is not", H0369) — an existential particle of negation, functioning as the counterpart to yesh, closing the alternative "or is there not."
What the text says
The verse is structured around a double naming formula: va-yikra shem ha-maqom ("and he called the name of the place") followed by two proper nouns joined by u- ("and", H9002): Massah and Meribah. This is followed by two parallel causal clauses, each introduced by the preposition 'al ("on/because", H5921): the first cause is 'al-riv bene Yisra'el ("because of the quarrel of the sons of Israel"), the second is ve-'al nassotam et-Yehovah ("and because of their testing Yehovah"). The construct chains (riv bene Yisra'el, shem ha-maqom) link nouns directly without an intervening preposition, a standard feature of Hebrew possessive/relational phrasing.
The closing question is introduced by le'mor ("saying", H0559, qal infinitive), a common formula preceding direct speech. The question itself uses the paired particles yesh ("there is", H3426) and ayin ("there is not", H0369) joined by 'im ("or", H0518) — a fixed idiomatic construction in Biblical Hebrew for posing an either/or existential question, here concerning Yehovah's presence be-qirbenu ("in our midst", H7130 + suffix "our").
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the two place names as Peirasmos ("testing") and Loidorēsis ("reviling/reproach"), translating the Hebrew proper names Massah and Meribah by their meanings rather than transliterating them. The Vulgate gives only one name, Tentatio ("testing"), omitting a separate rendering corresponding to Meribah. The LXX also renders the closing question with a doubled verb, "Εἰ ἔστιν ἔστιν ἐν ἡμῖν," differing from the single yesh construction in the Hebrew.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.