Exodus 17:7

וַיִּקְרָא שֵׁם הַמָּקוֹם מַסָּה וּמְרִיבָה עַל־רִיב׀ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְעַל נַסֹּתָם אֶת־יְהוָה לֵאמֹר הֲיֵשׁ יְהוָה בְּקִרְבֵּנוּ אִם־אָֽיִן׃ פ

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיִּקְרָא֙ שֵׁ֣ם הַמָּק֔וֹם מַסָּ֖ה וּמְרִיבָ֑ה עַל־רִ֣יב׀ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל וְעַ֨ל נַסֹּתָ֤ם אֶת־יְהוָה֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר הֲיֵ֧שׁ יְהוָ֛ה בְּקִרְבֵּ֖נוּ אִם־אָֽיִן׃ פ

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ἐπωνόμασεν τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ τόπου ἐκείνου Πειρασμός, καὶ Λοιδόρησις, διὰ τὴν λοιδορίαν τῶν υἱῶν Ἰσραὴλ καὶ διὰ τὸ πειράζειν κύριον λέγοντας Εἰ ἔστιν ἔστιν ἐν ἡμῖν ἢ οὔ ;

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

et vocavit nomen loci illius, Tentatio, propter jurgium filiorum Israël, et quia tentaverunt Dominum, dicentes: Estne Dominus in nobis, an non?

Spanish

Y Moisés llamó a aquel lugar Masah, y también Meribá, por el pleito de los israelitas, y porque pusieron a prueba a Yehová al decir: “¿Está Yehová entre nosotros, o no?”

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y llamó el nombre de aquel lugar Massah y Meribah, por la rencilla de los hijos de Israel, y porque tentaron á Jehová, diciendo: ¿Está, pues, Jehová entre nosotros, ó no?

English

He named the place Massah and Meribah because the Israelites quarreled, and because they tested the LORD, saying, “ Is the LORD among us or not?” The Defeat of the Amalekites

What the text says

Summary

The verse narrates how the place received two names, Massah ("testing", H4532) and Meribah ("quarrel", H4809), explaining this naming by two causes: the quarrel of the people of Israel and their testing of Yehovah. The verse closes by quoting the people's question, "Is Yehovah in our midst, or not?"

Key words

  • va-yikra ("and he called", H7121) — qal narrative form; the vav-consecutive marks this as the next event in the story sequence, following what happened at Massah/Meribah.
  • riv ("quarrel of", H7379) — masculine singular construct; grammatically linked to bene Yisra'el ("sons of Israel", H1121), forming "the quarrel of the sons of Israel."
  • nassotam ("their testing", H5254) — piel infinitive with 3mp suffix; the piel stem intensifies the verbal idea (testing/trying), and the suffix "-am" ("they/their") identifies Israel as the one who tests, with et-Yehovah (H0853 + H3068) marking Yehovah as the direct object of that testing.
  • yesh ("is there", H3426) — an existential particle asserting presence; combined with the interrogative ha (H9008) it forms the question "is there...?"
  • ayin ("not/there is not", H0369) — an existential particle of negation, functioning as the counterpart to yesh, closing the alternative "or is there not."

What the text says

The verse is structured around a double naming formula: va-yikra shem ha-maqom ("and he called the name of the place") followed by two proper nouns joined by u- ("and", H9002): Massah and Meribah. This is followed by two parallel causal clauses, each introduced by the preposition 'al ("on/because", H5921): the first cause is 'al-riv bene Yisra'el ("because of the quarrel of the sons of Israel"), the second is ve-'al nassotam et-Yehovah ("and because of their testing Yehovah"). The construct chains (riv bene Yisra'el, shem ha-maqom) link nouns directly without an intervening preposition, a standard feature of Hebrew possessive/relational phrasing.

The closing question is introduced by le'mor ("saying", H0559, qal infinitive), a common formula preceding direct speech. The question itself uses the paired particles yesh ("there is", H3426) and ayin ("there is not", H0369) joined by 'im ("or", H0518) — a fixed idiomatic construction in Biblical Hebrew for posing an either/or existential question, here concerning Yehovah's presence be-qirbenu ("in our midst", H7130 + suffix "our").

Differences between versions

The LXX renders the two place names as Peirasmos ("testing") and Loidorēsis ("reviling/reproach"), translating the Hebrew proper names Massah and Meribah by their meanings rather than transliterating them. The Vulgate gives only one name, Tentatio ("testing"), omitting a separate rendering corresponding to Meribah. The LXX also renders the closing question with a doubled verb, "Εἰ ἔστιν ἔστιν ἐν ἡμῖν," differing from the single yesh construction in the Hebrew.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.