Exodus 16:7
וּבֹקֶר וּרְאִיתֶם אֶת־כְּבוֹד יְהוָה בְּשָׁמְעוֹ אֶת־תְּלֻנֹּתֵיכֶם עַל־יְהוָה וְנַחְנוּ מָה כִּי תַלִּינוּ עָלֵֽינוּ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וּבֹ֗קֶר וּרְאִיתֶם֙ אֶת־כְּב֣וֹד יְהוָ֔ה בְּשָׁמְע֥וֹ אֶת־תְּלֻנֹּתֵיכֶ֖ם עַל־יְהוָ֑ה וְנַ֣חְנוּ מָ֔ה כִּ֥י תַלִּ֖ינוּ עָלֵֽינוּ׃
καὶ πρωὶ ὄψεσθε τὴν δόξαν κυρίου ἐν τῷ εἰσακοῦσαι τὸν γογγυσμὸν ὑμῶν ἐπὶ τῷ θεῷ· ἡμεῖς δὲ τί ἐσμεν ὅτι διαγογγύζετε καθ’ ἡμῶν ;
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
et mane videbitis gloriam Domini: audivit enim murmur vestrum contra Dominum: nos vero quid sumus, quia mussitastis contra nos?
Y mañana en la mañana verán la gloria de Yehová, porque él ya escuchó cómo se andan quejando de él. Al fin y al cabo, ¿quiénes somos nosotros para que se anden quejando de nosotros?”
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y á la mañana veréis la gloria de Jehová; porque él ha oído vuestras murmuraciones contra Jehová; que nosotros, ¿ qué somos, para que vosotros murmuréis contra nosotros?
and in the morning you will see the LORD ’s glory, because He has heard your grumbling against Him. For who are we that you should grumble against us?”
✦ What the text says
Summary
Exodus 16:7 records Moses announcing that in the morning the Israelites will see the glory of YHWH (H3068G), because he has heard their complaints directed against him. The verse closes with a rhetorical question distinguishing Moses and Aaron ("we") from YHWH, asking why the people's grumbling is directed at "us."
Key words
- kevod ("glory of", H3519) — masculine singular noun in construct state, linked to Yehovah (H3068G): "glory of YHWH."
- be-shom'o (sha.me + suffix, H8085G) — qal infinitive construct with prefixed preposition be ("in/because") and 3rd person suffix "his," forming a temporal/causal clause: "in his hearing" / "because he heard."
- telunnotekhem ("your grumblings", H8519) — feminine plural noun in construct state with 2nd person plural suffix, naming the grumblings as belonging to "you (pl.)."
- nachnu mah ("we, what", H5168 + H4100) — independent personal pronoun "we" followed by the interrogative "what," forming a self-contained rhetorical question, "and we — what [are we]?"
- tallinu ("you will cause to grumble", H3885B) — hiphil imperfect, 2nd person masculine plural: the causative stem marks the subject as producing or directing the grumbling action, distinct from a simple qal "to grumble."
What the text says
The sentence opens with u-voqer ("and morning", H1242) followed by the sequential perfect re'item ("you will see", H7200G), a narrative construction that continues the temporal sequence begun in the surrounding verses: "and [in the] morning, and you will see the glory of YHWH." The clause of cause is built with the infinitive construct be-shom'o: "because of his hearing," i.e., "because he has heard," governing the direct object et-telunnotekhem ("your grumblings", H8519) with the preposition 'al ("on/against", H5921A) marking the target, Yehovah.
The second half shifts to a rhetorical construction: ve-nachnu mah ("and we, what") places the independent pronoun "we" before the interrogative "what," emphasizing the identity of the speakers (Moses and Aaron) in contrast to YHWH. The subordinating particle ki (H3588A, "that/if") introduces the result clause with tallinu, a hiphil imperfect of the root behind "to grumble." Because hiphil is a causative stem, the form denotes the people's action of causing grumbling to be directed 'aleinu ("against us", H5921A + suffix), rather than simply "grumbling."
Differences between versions
The Hebrew hiphil tallinu ("you cause to grumble," causative stem) is rendered in the LXX as διαγογγύζετε (a plain verb "you grumble/murmur," not causative in form) and in the Vulgate as mussitastis ("you have murmured"), also a simple, non-causative verb. The English versions (BSB, RV1909) likewise translate with a simple "grumble/murmur," not preserving the causative nuance visible in the Hebrew stem.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.