Exodus 16:15

וַיִּרְאוּ בְנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיֹּאמְרוּ אִישׁ אֶל־אָחִיו מָן הוּא כִּי לֹא יָדְעוּ מַה־הוּא וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה אֲלֵהֶם הוּא הַלֶּחֶם אֲשֶׁר נָתַן יְהוָה לָכֶם לְאָכְלָֽה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיִּרְא֣וּ בְנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל וַיֹּ֨אמְר֜וּ אִ֤ישׁ אֶל־אָחִיו֙ מָ֣ן ה֔וּא כִּ֛י לֹ֥א יָדְע֖וּ מַה־ה֑וּא וַיֹּ֤אמֶר מֹשֶׁה֙ אֲלֵהֶ֔ם ה֣וּא הַלֶּ֔חֶם אֲשֶׁ֨ר נָתַ֧ן יְהוָ֛ה לָכֶ֖ם לְאָכְלָֽה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ἰδόντες δὲ αὐτὸ οἱ υἱοὶ Ἰσραὴλ εἶπαν ἕτερος τῷ ἑτέρῳ Τί ἐστιν τοῦτο; οὐ γὰρ ᾔδε’ ἴσαν τί ἦν. εἶπεν δὲ Μωυσῆς αὐτοῖς οὗτος ὁ ἄρτος ὃν ἕδωκεν κύριος ὑμῖν Φαγεῖν.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Quod cum vidissent filii Israël, dixerunt ad invicem: Manhu? quod significat: Quid est hoc? ignorabant enim quid esset. Quibus ait Moyses: Iste est panis quem Dominus dedit vobis ad vescendum.

Spanish

Al verlo, los israelitas se preguntaban unos a otros: “¿Y esto qué es?” Porque no sabían lo que era. Moisés les explicó: “Es el pan que Yehová les ha dado para comer.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y viéndolo los hijos de Israel, se dijeron unos á otros: ¿ Qué es esto? porque no sabían qué era. Entonces Moisés les dijo: Es el pan que Jehová os da para comer.

English

When the Israelites saw it, they asked one another, “ What is it?” For they did not know what it was. So Moses told them, “ It is the bread that the LORD has given you to eat.

What the text says

Summary

The Israelites see the substance on the ground and ask each other "man hu" — "what is it?" — because they do not recognize it. Moses answers that it is the bread that Yehovah has given them to eat.

Key words

  • man ("what?", H4478B) — an interrogative pronoun; this is the specific word later echoed in the name "manna," distinct from the more common interrogative mah used later in the same episode (v.16).
  • hu ("it/he", H1931) — a personal pronoun functioning as a copula ("it is"), used twice in the verse: once in the question (man hu) and once in Moses' answer (hu ha-lechem, "it [is] the bread").
  • 'ish... 'achiv ("each... his brother", H0376I/H0251I) — a reciprocal idiom, "a man to his brother," expressing "one to another."
  • yade'u ("they knew", H3045) — qal perfect, a completed state of not-knowing that explains the reason for the question introduced by ki ("for/because", H3588A).
  • nathan ("he has given", H5414G) — qal perfect describing Yehovah's completed act of giving, modifying ha-lechem ("the bread") through the relative particle 'asher ("which", H0834A).

What the text says

The verse opens with two narrative-chain verbs (va-yir'u, "and they saw"; va-yo'meru, "and they said"), marking sequential action: seeing leads immediately to speech. The question itself, man hu, uses the pronoun hu as a linking copula rather than a full verb "to be," a common feature in Hebrew nominal/pronominal clauses. The reason clause ki lo yade'u mah hu ("for they did not know what it was") repeats the question structure but with the alternate interrogative mah instead of man, showing that the two forms are used as synonyms within the passage, though man is the less frequent choice here.

Moses' reply mirrors the question's grammar: hu ha-lechem places the pronoun hu before the noun with the definite article, structurally paralleling the earlier question and answering it directly — "it is the bread." The bread is further specified by a relative clause, 'asher nathan Yehovah lakhem le-'okhlah ("which Yehovah has given you for food"), where the final phrase le-'okhlah uses a preposition plus a feminine noun ("food") to indicate purpose.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew interrogative man hu is rendered by the LXX simply as "τί ἐστιν τοῦτο" ("what is this"), translating the sense without preserving the sound of man. The Vulgate instead transliterates the phrase as "Manhu" and then glosses it in Latin ("quod significat: Quid est hoc," "which means: what is this"), explicitly marking it as a foreign expression requiring translation — a treatment the Hebrew text and the LXX do not show in the same way.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.