Exodus 16:13
וַיְהִי בָעֶרֶב וַתַּעַל הַשְּׂלָו וַתְּכַס אֶת־הַֽמַּחֲנֶה וּבַבֹּקֶר הָֽיְתָה שִׁכְבַת הַטַּל סָבִיב לַֽמַּחֲנֶֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיְהִ֣י בָעֶ֔רֶב וַתַּ֣עַל הַשְּׂלָ֔ו וַתְּכַ֖ס אֶת־הַֽמַּחֲנֶ֑ה וּבַבֹּ֗קֶר הָֽיְתָה֙ שִׁכְבַ֣ת הַטַּ֔ל סָבִ֖יב לַֽמַּחֲנֶֽה׃
ἐγένετο δὲ ἑσπέρα, κα ὀρτυγομήτρα ὀρτυγομήτρα καὶ ἐκάλυψεν τὴν παρεμβολήν· τὸ πρωὶ ἐγένετο καταπαυομένης τῆς δρόσου κύκλῳ τῆς παρεμβολῆς·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Factum est ergo vespere, et ascendens coturnix, cooperuit castra: mane quoque ros jacuit per circuitum castrorum.
Esa misma tarde llegaron muchísimas codornices que cubrieron todo el campamento, y a la mañana siguiente había una capa de rocío alrededor de las carpas.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y venida la tarde subieron codornices que cubrieron el real; y á la mañana descendió rocío en derredor del real.
That evening quail came and covered the camp, and in the morning there was a layer of dew around the camp.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes two time-markers, evening and morning, each introducing a natural event: quail rising to cover the camp at evening, and a layer of dew appearing around the camp at morning. The sentence is built as two parallel temporal clauses connected by narrative sequence.
Key words
- vayehi ("it was", H1961) — qal narrative form of "to be," opens the first temporal clause ("and it was in the evening..."), a standard formula introducing a new narrative moment.
- ta'al ("it came up", H5927G) — qal narrative (wayyiqtol) form, feminine, agreeing with selav ("quail"); continues the narrative chain begun by vayehi.
- tekhas ("it covered", H3680) — piel narrative form, an intensive stem, feminine, describing the quail's action of covering the camp completely.
- shikhvat ("layer of", H7902) — feminine singular construct noun, meaning it must be followed by another noun ("layer of X"); here linked to tal ("dew", H2919), forming "layer of dew."
- hayetah ("it was", H1961) — qal perfect (not narrative wayyiqtol) form of "to be," feminine, agreeing with shikhvat; marks a shift in verbal form from the preceding narrative chain.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence divides into two halves joined by the conjunction u ("and", H9002) before va-boqer ("in the morning"). The first half uses the standard narrative chain: vayehi ("it was") + va-'erev ("in the evening") introduces the scene, followed by two wayyiqtol verbs, ta'al ("it came up") and tekhas ("it covered"), both feminine to agree with ha-selav ("the quail", H7958), a feminine singular noun despite referring to what may be a collective bird population. The direct object marker 'et (H0853) before ha-machaneh ("the camp", H4264) marks the camp as the object being covered.
The second half shifts verbal form: instead of continuing the wayyiqtol narrative chain, the text uses hayetah ("it was"), a qal perfect. This grammatical shift — from narrative wayyiqtol to perfect — sets apart the morning event syntactically from the evening event, even though both are rendered "it was" in English. The construct phrase shikhvat ha-tal ("layer of the dew") functions as the subject of hayetah, meaning literally "a layer of the dew was, surrounding, to the camp." The word saviv ("around", H5439G) and the preposition-plus-article la-machaneh ("to the camp", H9005+H4264) together locate the dew-layer spatially around the camp, paralleling 'et-ha-machaneh in the first clause.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders ha-selav with ortygomētra (a term for a type of quail/quail-mother), while the Vulgate uses coturnix ("quail"), both compatible with the Hebrew selav ("quail", H7958). The Vulgate's ros jacuit ("dew lay") interprets the Hebrew construct shikhvat ha-tal ("layer of the dew") as a verbal action ("lay") rather than preserving the noun-based "layer" construction found in the Hebrew and in the LXX's katapauomenēs tēs drosou ("the dew settling/resting").
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.