Exodus 14:28
וַיָּשֻׁבוּ הַמַּיִם וַיְכַסּוּ אֶת־הָרֶכֶב וְאֶת־הַפָּרָשִׁים לְכֹל חֵיל פַּרְעֹה הַבָּאִים אַחֲרֵיהֶם בַּיָּם לֹֽא־נִשְׁאַר בָּהֶם עַד־אֶחָֽד׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיָּשֻׁ֣בוּ הַמַּ֗יִם וַיְכַסּ֤וּ אֶת־הָרֶ֙כֶב֙ וְאֶת־הַפָּ֣רָשִׁ֔ים לְכֹל֙ חֵ֣יל פַּרְעֹ֔ה הַבָּאִ֥ים אַחֲרֵיהֶ֖ם בַּיָּ֑ם לֹֽא־נִשְׁאַ֥ר בָּהֶ֖ם עַד־אֶחָֽד׃
καὶ ἐπαναστραφὲν τὸ ὕδωρ ἐκάλυψεν τὰ ἅρματα καὶ τοὺς ἀναβάτας καὶ πᾶσαν τὴν δύναμιν Φαραώ, τοὺς εἰσπεπορευμένους ὀπίσω αὐτῶν εἰς τὴν θάλασσαν· καὶ οὐ κατελείφθη ἐξ αὐτῶν οὐδὲ εἷς.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Reversæque sunt aquæ, et operuerunt currus et equites cuncti exercitus Pharaonis, qui sequentes ingressi fuerant mare: nec unus quidem superfuit ex eis.
Las aguas regresaron y cubrieron los carros, la caballería y a todo el ejército del faraón que había entrado al mar para perseguir a los israelitas. ¡No quedó ni uno solo de ellos con vida!
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y volvieron las aguas, y cubrieron los carros y la caballería, y todo el ejército de Faraón que había entrado tras ellos en la mar; no quedó de ellos ni uno.
The waters flowed back and covered the chariots and horsemen — the entire army of Pharaoh that had chased the Israelites into the sea. Not one of them survived.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The waters return to their place and cover the chariots, horsemen, and the entire army of Pharaoh that had entered the sea after the Israelites. The text closes with the emphatic statement that not a single one of them survived.
Key words
- va-yaShuvu ("and they returned", H7725G) — qal narrative verb, marks the sequential action of the waters going back to their former position.
- va-ykhaSu ("and they covered", H3680) — piel narrative verb; the piel stem intensifies the action, suggesting a thorough or complete covering rather than a partial one.
- ha-baIm ("the ones who had gone", H0935G) — qal participle, masculine plural, describing the army as those "in the state of having entered" after the Israelites; the participle frames the army's action as an ongoing or characterizing description rather than a single completed event.
- nish'Ar ("it remained/was left", H7604) — niphal perfect; the niphal (passive/reflexive) stem indicates that no remnant "was left," expressed impersonally.
- 'ad-'eChad ("up to one", H5704 + H0259) — a construction using "up to" plus the numeral "one," producing the idiomatic sense "not even a single one."
What the text says
The verse is built on two paired narrative (vav-consecutive) clauses: va-yaShuvu ha-Mayim ("and the waters returned") and va-ykhaSu... et-ha-Rekhev ve-et-ha-Parashim ("and they covered... the chariot[s] and the horsemen"). Both objects — Rekhev ("chariot", H7393G) and Parashim ("horsemen", H6571B) — are marked with the direct object particle 'et (H0853), which is untranslated but signals that these nouns are the grammatical objects of the covering action. The phrase le-khol cheil Par'oh ("to all the army of Pharaoh") uses a construct chain (khol... cheil..., "all of... army of...") to specify that the chariots and horsemen belong to, or constitute, "the whole army of Pharaoh."
The relative-like participle ha-baIm 'achareihem ba-Yam ("the ones who had gone after them into the sea") modifies this army, describing it not with a finite past-tense verb but with a participial form that in Hebrew often carries a durative or characterizing nuance — "those who were entering/had entered."
The final clause, lo-nish'ar bahem 'ad-'echad, uses the niphal perfect nish'ar ("it remained") negated by lo ("not"), followed by the idiom 'ad-'echad ("up to one"). This construction expresses totality of loss impersonally: literally "there was not left among them, up to one," i.e., no remainder existed even down to a single individual.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the Hebrew's two-part construct phrase ("chariot... horsemen... all the army of Pharaoh") with a parallel list (ἅρματα, ἀναβάτας, πᾶσαν τὴν δύναμιν), matching the Hebrew structure closely. Where the Hebrew participle ha-baIm ("the ones who had gone") is a participial description, the LXX uses a perfect participle (τοὺς εἰσπεπορευμένους), and the Vulgate uses a relative clause with pluperfect ("qui... ingressi fuerant"), both converting the Hebrew's participial construction into more explicitly tensed forms. The BSB and SBLIBRE additionally insert "the Israelites" as the object of pursuit, a clarification not explicit in the Hebrew text, which only has the third-person suffix 'achareihem ("after them", H0310A + H9038).
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.