Exodus 14:21
וַיֵּט מֹשֶׁה אֶת־יָדוֹ עַל־הַיָּם וַיּוֹלֶךְ יְהוָה׀ אֶת־הַיָּם בְּרוּחַ קָדִים עַזָּה כָּל־הַלַּיְלָה וַיָּשֶׂם אֶת־הַיָּם לֶחָרָבָה וַיִּבָּקְעוּ הַמָּֽיִם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיֵּ֨ט מֹשֶׁ֣ה אֶת־יָדוֹ֮ עַל־הַיָּם֒ וַיּ֣וֹלֶךְ יְהוָ֣ה׀ אֶת־הַ֠יָּם בְּר֨וּחַ קָדִ֤ים עַזָּה֙ כָּל־הַלַּ֔יְלָה וַיָּ֥שֶׂם אֶת־הַיָּ֖ם לֶחָרָבָ֑ה וַיִּבָּקְע֖וּ הַמָּֽיִם׃
ἐξέτεινεν δὲ Μωυσῆς τὴν χεῖρα ἐπὶ τὴν θάλασσαν· καὶ ὑπήγαγεν κύριος τὴν θάλασσαν ἐν ἀνέμῳ νότῳ βιαίῳ ὅλην τὴν νύκτα, καὶ ἐποίησεν τὴν θάλασσαν ξηράν, καὶ ἐσχίσθη τὸ ὕδωρ.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Cumque extendisset Moyses manum super mare, abstulit illud Dominus flante vento vehementi et urente tota nocte, et vertit in siccum: divisaque est aqua.
Moisés extendió su mano sobre el mar, y Yehová mandó un fuerte viento del este que sopló toda la noche y partió el mar en dos. Las aguas se dividieron y el fondo del mar quedó seco.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y extendió Moisés su mano sobre la mar, é hizo Jehová que la mar se retirase por recio viento oriental toda aquella noche; y tornó la mar en seco, y las aguas quedaron divididas.
Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea, and all that night the LORD drove back the sea with a strong east wind that turned it into dry land. So the waters were divided,
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse describes Moses stretching his hand over the sea, followed by Yehovah causing the sea to move back through a strong east wind blowing all night, turning the seabed dry and splitting the waters.
Key words
- yado ("his hand", H3027) — noun in construct form with pronominal suffix "his," specifying the body part Moses extends.
- yolekh ("he drove", H1980) — hiphil (causative) stem: not simply "the sea went," but "Yehovah caused [the sea] to go," marking Yehovah as the direct causal agent of the sea's movement.
- ruach ("wind", H7307) — feminine singular noun in construct form, linked to qadim ("east wind", H6921) to form the phrase "wind of the east."
- azzah ("strong", H5794) — feminine singular adjective agreeing with ruach, intensifying the wind's force.
- yibbaqe'u ("they were divided", H1234) — niphal (passive/reflexive) verb, plural, referring to ha-mayim ("the waters"); the grammatical subject undergoes the division without a stated agent in this clause.
What the text says
The verse is built as a chain of narrative clauses linked by the vav consecutive (va-), each introducing a new sequential action: Moses stretches out his hand (va-yet), Yehovah drives the sea (va-yolekh), he makes the sea into dry ground (va-yasem), and the waters are divided (va-yibbaqe'u). This chain structure presents the events as a tightly sequenced series rather than simultaneous occurrences.
The verb yolekh is in the hiphil stem, derived from the root meaning "to go" (H1980), which in this causative form means "to cause to go" — the text specifies Yehovah as the one actively causing the sea's movement, rather than describing the sea acting on its own. The wind is described with a construct phrase, ruach qadim ("wind of the east"), modified by the adjective azzah ("strong"), and its duration is marked by kol ha-laylah ("all the night"). The final verb, yibbaqe'u, is niphal — a passive/reflexive form — describing the waters as undergoing splitting; the clause itself does not name an agent for this specific action, in contrast to the two preceding verbs where Yehovah is the explicit subject.
Differences between versions
The Hebrew specifies qadim ("east wind", H6921), while the LXX renders this as νότῳ ("south wind"). The Vulgate does not specify a direction, instead describing the wind as "vehementi et urente" ("vehement and burning"). For the adjective azzah ("strong", H5794), the LXX uses βιαίῳ ("violent/forceful"). The Hebrew hiphil yolekh ("caused to go/drove") is rendered in the LXX as ὑπήγαγεν ("led away/withdrew") and in the Vulgate as "abstulit" ("took away, removed"), each framing Yehovah's action on the sea somewhat differently.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.