Exodus 1:22
וַיְצַו פַּרְעֹה לְכָל־עַמּוֹ לֵאמֹר כָּל־הַבֵּן הַיִּלּוֹד הַיְאֹרָה תַּשְׁלִיכֻהוּ וְכָל־הַבַּת תְּחַיּֽוּן׃ ס
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיְצַ֣ו פַּרְעֹ֔ה לְכָל־עַמּ֖וֹ לֵאמֹ֑ר כָּל־הַבֵּ֣ן הַיִּלּ֗וֹד הַיְאֹ֙רָה֙ תַּשְׁלִיכֻ֔הוּ וְכָל־הַבַּ֖ת תְּחַיּֽוּן׃ ס
Συνέταξεν δὲ Φαραὼ παντὶ τῷ λαῷ αὐτοῦ λέγων Πᾶν’ ἄρσεν ὃ ἐὰν τεχθῇ τοῖς Ἑβραίοις εἰς τὸν ποταμὸν ῥίψατε, καὶ πᾶν θῆλυ, ζωογονεῖτε αὐτό.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Præcepit ergo Pharao omni populo suo, dicens: Quidquid masculini sexus natum fuerit, in flumen projicite: quidquid feminini, reservate.
Entonces el faraón le ordenó a todo su pueblo: “Echarán al río a todo niño hebreo que nazca, pero a toda niña la dejarán vivir.”
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Entonces Faraón mandó á todo su pueblo, diciendo: Echad en el río todo hijo que naciere, y á toda hija reservad la vida.
Then Pharaoh commanded all his people: “ Every son born to the Hebrews you must throw into the Nile, but every daughter you may allow to live.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
Pharaoh issues a command to his entire people: every son born is to be thrown into the Nile, while every daughter is to be kept alive. The verse reports the content of a royal decree through indirect/quoted speech introduced by le'mor ("saying", H0559).
Key words
- yeTzav ("he commanded", H6680) — piel narrative verb; the intensive stem marks this as a formal, forceful royal order, not a casual request.
- hayyillod ("born", H3209) — masculine singular adjective with definite article, modifying ha-Ben ("the son", H1121A); it specifies "the son who is born," i.e., every male infant at birth.
- tashlikhuhu ("you will throw him", H7993) — hiphil (causative) imperfect, second person plural, with object suffix "him"; the causative stem conveys forced casting/throwing, and the imperfect gives it command force ("you shall throw").
- techayyun ("you will let live", H2421) — piel imperfect plural with paragogic nun (H9013); the piel stem is intensive ("cause to live, keep alive" rather than simple "live"), and the paragogic nun adds emphasis to the final verb of the decree.
- ha-ye'orah ("the River", H2975G) + directional he (H9011) — the directional suffix marks motion "toward/into" the river, specifying the destination of the throwing.
What the text says
The verse is built as a main clause (vayeTzav Par'oh le-khol-ammo le'mor, "and Pharaoh commanded all his people, saying") followed by the quoted decree itself, structured as two parallel clauses. Each clause opens with kol ("every/all", H3605) in construct form — kol-ha-Ben ha-yillod ("every son that is born") and ve-khol-ha-Bat ("and every daughter") — creating a balanced antithetical structure: sons versus daughters, destruction versus preservation. The verbs governing each half are both second-person plural imperfects addressed to "all his people" (le-khol-ammo), meaning the command falls on the general population, not a specialized group. The hiphil stem of tashlikhuhu frames the throwing as a caused action upon the infant (the object suffix -hu, "him," H9033), while the piel of techayyun frames survival as something actively caused or maintained, not merely allowed to happen — both stems intensify the contrast between destroying and actively sustaining life. The paragogic nun on the final verb is a stylistic emphasis marker, common in Biblical Hebrew imperfects, adding weight to the concluding instruction.
Differences between versions
The Hebrew text and the Vulgate address the decree to "all his people" without specifying whose infants are targeted. The Septuagint inserts τοῖς Ἑβραίοις ("to the Hebrews"), a phrase not present in the Hebrew wording given, explicitly limiting the scope of the decree to Hebrew infants. The BSB and SBLIBRE translations follow the LXX's addition ("born to the Hebrews" / "niño hebreo"), while the RV1909 and the Vulgate's Latin phrasing stay closer to the unspecified Hebrew formulation, referring simply to "todo hijo" / "quidquid masculini sexus."
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.