Deuteronomy 9:25
וָֽאֶתְנַפַּל לִפְנֵי יְהוָה אֵת אַרְבָּעִים הַיּוֹם וְאֶת־אַרְבָּעִים הַלַּיְלָה אֲשֶׁר הִתְנַפָּלְתִּי כִּֽי־אָמַר יְהוָה לְהַשְׁמִיד אֶתְכֶֽם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וָֽאֶתְנַפַּ֞ל לִפְנֵ֣י יְהוָ֗ה אֵ֣ת אַרְבָּעִ֥ים הַיּ֛וֹם וְאֶת־אַרְבָּעִ֥ים הַלַּ֖יְלָה אֲשֶׁ֣ר הִתְנַפָּ֑לְתִּי כִּֽי־אָמַ֥ר יְהוָ֖ה לְהַשְׁמִ֥יד אֶתְכֶֽם׃
καὶ ἐδεήθην ἐναντίοι Κυρίου τεσσεράκοντα ἡμέρας καὶ τεσσεράκοντα νύκτας ὅσας ἐδεήθην, εἶπεν γὰρ κύριος ἐξολεθρεῦσαι ὑμᾶς·
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Et jacui coram Domino quadraginta diebus ac noctibus, quibus eum suppliciter deprecabar, ne deleret vos ut fuerat comminatus:
Por eso me postré ante Yehová los cuarenta días y las cuarenta noches que estuve postrado, porque Yehová había dicho que los destruiría.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Postréme, pues, delante de Jehová cuarenta días y cuarenta noches que estuve postrado; porque Jehová dijo que os había de destruir.
So I fell down before the LORD for forty days and forty nights, because the LORD had said He would destroy you.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse recounts that the speaker prostrated himself before Yehovah for forty days and forty nights, explaining that this act of prostration occurred because Yehovah had said he would destroy the people. The verse uses two forms of the same verb to frame the duration of the act and its cause.
Key words
- 'et.na.Pal ("I prostrated myself", H5307G) — hithpael narrative form, marking the main sequential action of the story ("and I fell down/prostrated myself").
- hit.na.Pal.ti ("I prostrated myself", H5307G) — same root in hithpael perfect, but here describing the completed state of the action already introduced, used in a relative clause ("which I had prostrated").
- 'a.Sher ("which", H0834A) — relative particle connecting the forty days/nights to the verb of prostration, specifying the duration referred to.
- ki- ("for", H3588A) — subordinating particle introducing the reason clause, linking the prostration to Yehovah's prior statement.
- hash.Mid ("destroy", H8045) — hiphil infinitive (causative), expressing the intended action Yehovah had declared ("to destroy").
What the text says
The verse opens with the narrative vav construction va. + 'et.na.Pal, continuing the sequence of the account and introducing the main verb: the speaker "fell down" or "prostrated himself" before Yah.weh ("Yehovah", H3068G). The object phrase built from 'et (untranslated object marker) plus 'ar.ba.'Im ("forty", H0705) and Yom ("day", H3117G) specifies the duration, repeated with ve. ("and") for the parallel phrase concerning Lay.lah ("night", H3915). This numeral phrase is then modified by the relative clause introduced by 'a.Sher ("which", H0834A), which uses the same verbal root again — this time as hit.na.Pal.ti, a perfect hithpael form in the first person, denoting the completed nature of the extended prostration already mentioned.
The second half of the verse shifts to explanation via ki- ("for", H3588A), introducing a causal or subordinate clause. This clause states that Yah.weh ("Yehovah", H3068G) "had said" ('a.Mar, qal perfect) with intent expressed through the hiphil infinitive hash.Mid ("destroy", H8045), governing the object suffix Khem ("you", H9036, masculine plural). The grammatical structure ties the extended physical action of prostration directly to a stated prior declaration by Yehovah, using verb repetition (the same root in two conjugated forms) to emphasize the continuity and completeness of the act described.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the Hebrew 'et.na.Pal / hit.na.Pal.ti ("prostrated myself") with ἐδεήθην ("I begged/pleaded"), shifting the semantic emphasis from physical prostration to verbal supplication, and repeats this verb where the Hebrew repeats its own root. The Vulgate renders the first verb as jacui ("I lay down") and adds suppliciter deprecabar ("I begged with entreaty") for the relative clause, combining physical posture with verbal pleading, which is not explicit in the Hebrew wording of either verb form.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.