Deuteronomy 8:18
וְזָֽכַרְתָּ אֶת־יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ כִּי הוּא הַנֹּתֵן לְךָ כֹּחַ לַעֲשׂוֹת חָיִל לְמַעַן הָקִים אֶת־בְּרִיתוֹ אֲשֶׁר־נִשְׁבַּע לַאֲבֹתֶיךָ כַּיּוֹם הַזֶּֽה׃ פ
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְזָֽכַרְתָּ֙ אֶת־יְהוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֶ֔יךָ כִּ֣י ה֗וּא הַנֹּתֵ֥ן לְךָ֛ כֹּ֖חַ לַעֲשׂ֣וֹת חָ֑יִל לְמַ֨עַן הָקִ֧ים אֶת־בְּרִית֛וֹ אֲשֶׁר־נִשְׁבַּ֥ע לַאֲבֹתֶ֖יךָ כַּיּ֥וֹם הַזֶּֽה׃ פ
καὶ μνησθήσῃ Κυρίου τοῦ θεοῦ σου, ὅτι αὐτός σοι δίδωσι τὴν ἰσχὺν τοῦ ποιῆσαι δύναμιν, καὶ ἵνα στήσῃ τὴν διαθήκην ἣν ὤμοσεν κύριος τοῖς πατράσιν σου ὡς σήμερον.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
sed recorderis Domini Dei tui, quod ipse vires tibi præbuerit, ut impleret pactum suum, super quo juravit patribus tuis, sicut præsens indicat dies.
Pero te acordarás de Yehová, tu Dios, porque es él quien te da el poder para conseguir riquezas, para que confirme su pacto que juró a tus padres, como es hoy.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Antes acuérdate de Jehová tu Dios: porque él te da el poder para hacer las riquezas, á fin de confirmar su pacto que juró á tus padres, como en este día.
But remember that it is the LORD your God who gives you the power to gain wealth, in order to confirm His covenant that He swore to your fathers even to this day.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse instructs remembering Yehovah as the one who continually gives the ability to produce wealth, with the stated purpose that this provision serves to fulfill the covenant sworn to the ancestors. The clause structure links memory of God to a specific causal explanation (why one should remember) and then to that explanation's own underlying purpose.
Key words
- za.khar.Ta ("you will remember", H2142) — qal perfect used as sequential/consecutive perfect, continuing a chain of instructions rather than marking a single past event.
- ha.no.Ten ("the one giving", H5414) — qal participle with definite article, functioning as a substantive predicate; describes an ongoing, characteristic action rather than a one-time event.
- la.'a.Sot chayil ("to do/acquire wealth", H6213 + H2428) — infinitive construct + noun; the infinitive marks purpose or result of the "strength" (koach) just mentioned.
- ha.Kim ("to cause to stand/establish", H6965) — hiphil infinitive construct, causative form; expresses bringing something into effect, here the covenant.
- nish.Ba' ("he swore", H7650) — niphal perfect; the niphal stem for this root carries an inherently reflexive/passive-toned sense conventionally rendered as an oath-taking action, referring back to the antecedent act tied to berit ("covenant", H1285).
What the text says
The sentence opens with the narrative ve (H9001) attached to za.khar.Ta, signaling continuation within a sequence of commands. The direct object marker 'et (H0853, twice, items 3 and 19) marks Yehovah 'Eloheikha and later berito as grammatical objects without adding independent meaning of its own.
The causal particle ki (H3588A, item 7) introduces the reason for remembering: hu ha-noten — "he [is] the one giving." Because noten is a participle rather than a finite past-tense verb, the Hebrew presents this as a standing characteristic of the subject, not a completed past act — the giving is ongoing.
The purpose clause begins with lema'an (H4616), followed by the hiphil infinitive ha.Kim — "to establish/cause to stand" — governing the object berito ("his covenant"). The relative clause asher nishba' la-avoteikha ("which he swore to your fathers") specifies which covenant, using the niphal perfect nishba' without repeating the subject explicitly; the referent (Yehovah) is understood from the preceding clause.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the purpose clause with explicit repetition of the subject: ἣν ὤμοσεν κύριος τοῖς πατράσιν σου ("which the Lord swore to your fathers"), naming κύριος directly, where the Hebrew relative clause leaves the subject of nishba' unstated grammatically. The Vulgate uses impleret ("that he might fulfill") for the hiphil ha.Kim, a translation choice distinct from "establish" or "cause to stand," and phrases the oath clause as super quo juravit ("concerning which he swore") rather than as a direct relative clause on berit.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.