Deuteronomy 4:18

תַּבְנִית כָּל־רֹמֵשׂ בָּאֲדָמָה תַּבְנִית כָּל־דָּגָה אֲשֶׁר־בַּמַּיִם מִתַּחַת לָאָֽרֶץ׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

תַּבְנִ֕ית כָּל־רֹמֵ֖שׂ בָּאֲדָמָ֑ה תַּבְנִ֛ית כָּל־דָּגָ֥ה אֲשֶׁר־בַּמַּ֖יִם מִתַּ֥חַת לָאָֽרֶץ׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ὁμοίωμα παντὸς ἑρπετοῦ ὃ ἕρπει ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, ὁμοίωμα παντὸς ἰχθύος, ἅ ἐστιν ἐν τοῖς ὕδασιν ὑποκάτω τῆς γῆς·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

atque reptilium, quæ moventur in terra, sive piscium qui sub terra morantur in aquis:

Spanish

la semejanza de cualquier cosa que se arrastre por el suelo, la semejanza de cualquier pez que esté en el agua bajo la tierra;

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Figura de ningún animal que vaya arrastrando por la tierra, figura de pez alguno que haya en el agua debajo de la tierra:

English

or of any creature that crawls on the ground or fish that is in the waters below.

What the text says

Summary

The verse continues a list of prohibited images, specifying that no likeness should be made of any creeping creature on the ground, nor of any fish that lives in the waters beneath the earth. It uses the same construct noun twice to introduce two categories of animals: land-crawlers and water-dwellers.

Key words

  • tavNit ("a likeness of", H8403) — feminine singular construct noun, repeated twice, each time governing the following noun ("likeness of X"); it structures the verse as a list of forbidden representations.
  • romes ("creeping [thing]", H7430) — Qal participle, masculine singular, meaning "the one that creeps"; participles in Hebrew function as verbal nouns, so this word denotes the category of creature by its characteristic action rather than by a fixed noun.
  • ba'adamah ("on the ground", H0127G with H9003) — noun with prefixed preposition and article, marking the location where the creeping creature moves.
  • dagah ("fish", H1710) — feminine singular noun, second object of tavNit, introducing the aquatic category.
  • 'asher ("which", H0834A) — relative particle introducing a clause that further defines dagah, specifying its habitat as "in the waters under the earth."

What the text says

The verse is built on two parallel construct phrases, both headed by tavNit ("likeness of"), each followed by kol ("any", H3605) plus a noun denoting a class of creature. The first phrase, tavNit kol-romes ba'adamah, uses a participle (romes) rather than a simple noun to describe the creeping animal — grammatically this frames the creature by its ongoing action ("the one that creeps") rather than as a fixed species name. The prepositional phrase ba'adamah ("on the ground") locates this creeping activity.

The second phrase, tavNit kol-dagah, shifts to fish, introduced by the same construct pattern. Here, a relative clause introduced by 'asher ("which") expands the description: "which is in the waters under the earth" ('asher bammayim mittachat la'aretz). The compound preposition mi-tachat ("from under") plus la'aretz ("to/for the earth") produces the sense "beneath the earth," describing the location of the waters where the fish live. The doubled use of tavNit creates a rhythmic, list-like structure characteristic of legal enumeration, cataloguing categories of living things without naming individual species.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders romes ("the one creeping", H7430) with a relative clause, ὃ ἕρπει ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς ("which creeps upon the earth"), making explicit in Greek what the Hebrew participle implies through its verbal form alone. The Vulgate similarly expands to reptilium, quæ moventur in terra ("of creeping things, which move on the earth"), adding the verb moventur not present as a separate word in the Hebrew clause. Both the LXX and Vulgate also render mittachat la'aretz as "under the earth" (ὑποκάτω τῆς γῆς; sub terra), treating the phrase as modifying "earth" directly, while the Hebrew syntax places the waters as the immediate location ("in the waters, from under, to the earth").

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.