Deuteronomy 3:27
עֲלֵה׀ רֹאשׁ הַפִּסְגָּה וְשָׂא עֵינֶיךָ יָמָּה וְצָפֹנָה וְתֵימָנָה וּמִזְרָחָה וּרְאֵה בְעֵינֶיךָ כִּי־לֹא תַעֲבֹר אֶת־הַיַּרְדֵּן הַזֶּֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
עֲלֵ֣ה׀ רֹ֣אשׁ הַפִּסְגָּ֗ה וְשָׂ֥א עֵינֶ֛יךָ יָ֧מָּה וְצָפֹ֛נָה וְתֵימָ֥נָה וּמִזְרָ֖חָה וּרְאֵ֣ה בְעֵינֶ֑יךָ כִּי־לֹ֥א תַעֲבֹ֖ר אֶת־הַיַּרְדֵּ֥ן הַזֶּֽה׃
ἀνάβηθι ἐπὶ κορυφῇ Λελαξευμένου, καὶ ἀναβλέψας τοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς κατὰ θἁλασσαν καὶ βορρᾶν καὶ λίβα κα ἀνατολάς, καὶ ἴδε τοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς σου. ὅτι οὐ διαβήσῃ τὸν Ἰορδάνην τοῦτον.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Ascende cacumen Phasgæ, et oculos tuos circumfer ad occidentem, et ad aquilonem, austrumque et orientem, et aspice; nec enim transibis Jordanem istum.
Sube a la cima del Pisga y levanta tus ojos hacia el oeste, el norte, el sur y el este, y mira con tus ojos, porque no pasarás este Jordán.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Sube á la cumbre del Pisga, y alza tus ojos al occidente, y al aquilón, y al mediodía, y al oriente, y ve por tus ojos: porque no pasarás este Jordán.
Go to the top of Pisgah and look to the west and north and south and east. See the land with your own eyes, for you will not cross this Jordan.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Yehovah instructs Moses to climb to the top of Mount Pisgah and look in all four directions with his own eyes, because he will not cross the Jordan River. The verse is structured as a series of four imperatives followed by a causal clause explaining the restriction.
Key words
- 'a.Leh ("go up", H5927G) — qal imperative, a direct command establishing the physical action opening the verse.
- pis.Gah ("Pisgah", H6449) — proper noun naming the mountain, preceded by the definite article ha (H9009) and the construct noun rosh ("top of", H7218I).
- 'ei.Nei.kha ("your eyes", H5869A + H9021) — dual construct noun with pronominal suffix, appearing twice (vv. 7-8 and 23-24), framing the seeing action.
- ta.'a.Vor ("you will pass over", H5674A) — qal imperfect, expressing the negated future action that explains why Moses must look rather than cross.
- ki- ("that/if", H3588A) — subordinating particle introducing the causal clause that gives the reason for the command to look.
What the text says
The verse opens with three consecutive imperatives — 'a.Leh ("go up", H5927G), Sa' ("lift up", H5375M), and re.'Eh ("see", H7200G) — all second-person masculine singular qal forms addressed to Moses. This chain of commands structures the verse around a single subject performing successive actions: ascending, lifting the eyes, and seeing. The four directional terms — Ya.ma ("west", H3220H), tza.Fo.na ("north", H6828G), tei.Ma.na ("south", H8486), and miz.Ra.cha ("east", H4217H) — each carry the directional he suffix (H9011), a grammatical feature marking motion or orientation "toward" a place, here indicating the direction of gaze rather than physical movement.
The repetition of 'ei.Nei.kha ("your eyes", H5869A + H9021) in both the "lift up" and "see" clauses creates a structural echo: the eyes are lifted first, then used to see with emphasis (be'einekha, "with your own eyes"), reinforced by the preposition be (H9003). The final clause is introduced by ki (H3588A), a particle that can function causally ("because") or conditionally ("if"), followed by the negation lo' (H3808) and the imperfect verb ta.'a.Vor ("you will pass over", H5674A). The direct object marker 'et (H0853) precedes hai.yar.Den ("the Jordan", H3383), marking it as the grammatical object of the crossing that will not occur.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders pis.Gah (H6449), a proper place name in the Hebrew, as Λελαξευμένου ("of the hewn/quarried [rock]"), treating it as a descriptive term rather than transliterating it as a proper noun. The Vulgate instead transliterates it as "Phasgæ," aligning more closely with the Hebrew proper name. The LXX also translates Sa' ("lift up") with ἀναβλέψας ("having looked up"), shifting the imperative into a participial form, whereas the Hebrew maintains a direct imperative parallel to the surrounding commands.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.